确定施工团队主动争议管理的主导人格特征

Mabaruka Danja, Yusuf Joe Gandu, A. Muhammed
{"title":"确定施工团队主动争议管理的主导人格特征","authors":"Mabaruka Danja, Yusuf Joe Gandu, A. Muhammed","doi":"10.4236/OALIB.1107162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction dispute must be properly managed or else it will mar projects success by its negative impacts. The challenge in managing construction dispute aggravates by virtue of the diversity in the background of people who come together to deliver projects during procurement process. People could have distinct personality traits which come to bare in the course of interactions. While some traits in individuals enhance dispute management, others complicate and prolong the dispute management process. Of recent, it has been found that dispute increasingly takes longer time to resolve. One area that can bring improvement is a proactive approach in dispute management. The knowledge of the dominant traits among construction disputants will enhance proactive management. The purpose of this research therefore is to enhance proactive dispute management by determining the dominant personality traits in construction teams that could explain difficulty in dispute management. Seven personality traits were identified and a questionnaire administered through stratified random sampling process among clients, consultants and contractors teams. The research computed the mean values and used t distribution to test the level of significance of identified traits among—the client, consultants and contraction teams. The results of the analyses found that there are distinct traits among the teams. Clients are dominating during dispute, the consultants are obliging and integrating, while contractors avoid dispute situations. The clients and contractors’ traits are unhealthy to dispute management. However, all parties are found to have a common tendency to compromise during dispute situation. Knowledge of this will enable better planning as well as strategies developed for enhanced dispute management. In dispute management, strategy should focus on aspects that can cause a compromising stance among disputants while putting into cognizance the unique traits, characteristics or behavior of each team during dispute. Research should avail those aspects that add value to quick compromise among stakeholders during construction dispute.","PeriodicalId":19593,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Library Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the Dominant Personality Traits of Construction Teams for Proactive Dispute Management\",\"authors\":\"Mabaruka Danja, Yusuf Joe Gandu, A. Muhammed\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OALIB.1107162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Construction dispute must be properly managed or else it will mar projects success by its negative impacts. The challenge in managing construction dispute aggravates by virtue of the diversity in the background of people who come together to deliver projects during procurement process. People could have distinct personality traits which come to bare in the course of interactions. While some traits in individuals enhance dispute management, others complicate and prolong the dispute management process. Of recent, it has been found that dispute increasingly takes longer time to resolve. One area that can bring improvement is a proactive approach in dispute management. The knowledge of the dominant traits among construction disputants will enhance proactive management. The purpose of this research therefore is to enhance proactive dispute management by determining the dominant personality traits in construction teams that could explain difficulty in dispute management. Seven personality traits were identified and a questionnaire administered through stratified random sampling process among clients, consultants and contractors teams. The research computed the mean values and used t distribution to test the level of significance of identified traits among—the client, consultants and contraction teams. The results of the analyses found that there are distinct traits among the teams. Clients are dominating during dispute, the consultants are obliging and integrating, while contractors avoid dispute situations. The clients and contractors’ traits are unhealthy to dispute management. However, all parties are found to have a common tendency to compromise during dispute situation. Knowledge of this will enable better planning as well as strategies developed for enhanced dispute management. In dispute management, strategy should focus on aspects that can cause a compromising stance among disputants while putting into cognizance the unique traits, characteristics or behavior of each team during dispute. Research should avail those aspects that add value to quick compromise among stakeholders during construction dispute.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Library Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Library Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OALIB.1107162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OALIB.1107162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

施工纠纷必须妥善管理,否则会给工程建设带来负面影响。由于在采购过程中聚集在一起交付项目的人员背景的多样性,管理施工纠纷的挑战加剧了。人们可能有不同的性格特征,这些特征在互动过程中显露出来。虽然个人的某些特征会加强争议管理,但其他特征会使争议管理过程复杂化并延长。最近,人们发现争端越来越需要更长的时间来解决。可以带来改进的一个领域是在争议管理方面采取积极主动的方法。了解施工纠纷各方的主要特征将有助于加强主动管理。因此,本研究的目的是通过确定施工团队中可以解释争议管理困难的主导人格特征来增强前瞻性争议管理。通过分层随机抽样对客户、顾问和承包商团队进行问卷调查,确定了七种人格特征。该研究计算了平均值,并使用t分布来检验客户、顾问和承包团队之间识别特征的显著性水平。分析的结果发现,这些团队之间存在明显的特征。在纠纷中,客户处于主导地位,顾问处于顺从和整合状态,而承包商处于避免纠纷的状态。业主和承包商的特点不利于纠纷管理。然而,在纠纷情境中,各方当事人都有一个共同的妥协倾向。了解这一点将有助于更好地规划和制定战略,以加强争端管理。在争议管理中,策略应该关注可能导致争议方妥协立场的方面,同时考虑到争议中每个团队的独特特征、特征或行为。研究应利用在施工纠纷中对利益相关方的快速妥协有价值的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determining the Dominant Personality Traits of Construction Teams for Proactive Dispute Management
Construction dispute must be properly managed or else it will mar projects success by its negative impacts. The challenge in managing construction dispute aggravates by virtue of the diversity in the background of people who come together to deliver projects during procurement process. People could have distinct personality traits which come to bare in the course of interactions. While some traits in individuals enhance dispute management, others complicate and prolong the dispute management process. Of recent, it has been found that dispute increasingly takes longer time to resolve. One area that can bring improvement is a proactive approach in dispute management. The knowledge of the dominant traits among construction disputants will enhance proactive management. The purpose of this research therefore is to enhance proactive dispute management by determining the dominant personality traits in construction teams that could explain difficulty in dispute management. Seven personality traits were identified and a questionnaire administered through stratified random sampling process among clients, consultants and contractors teams. The research computed the mean values and used t distribution to test the level of significance of identified traits among—the client, consultants and contraction teams. The results of the analyses found that there are distinct traits among the teams. Clients are dominating during dispute, the consultants are obliging and integrating, while contractors avoid dispute situations. The clients and contractors’ traits are unhealthy to dispute management. However, all parties are found to have a common tendency to compromise during dispute situation. Knowledge of this will enable better planning as well as strategies developed for enhanced dispute management. In dispute management, strategy should focus on aspects that can cause a compromising stance among disputants while putting into cognizance the unique traits, characteristics or behavior of each team during dispute. Research should avail those aspects that add value to quick compromise among stakeholders during construction dispute.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of Mn, Fe, Ni in Copper Alloy by X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis Study on Evolution Characteristics and Driving Types of Zengtou Village in Li County, Aba Prefecture Soil Organic Matter and Nitrogen Content as Related to Coconut Nutrition in Guerrero, Mexico Generational Type and Employee Theft: A Case Study of Kopala Mine, Zambia China’s Official Development Assistance: An Implication of the Transport Infrastructure Development in Cambodia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1