颈动脉高度狭窄患者的微栓塞信号来源

J. L. Stork, K. Kimura, C. Levi, B. Chambers, A. Abbott, G. Donnan
{"title":"颈动脉高度狭窄患者的微栓塞信号来源","authors":"J. L. Stork, K. Kimura, C. Levi, B. Chambers, A. Abbott, G. Donnan","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000021002.17394.7F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— In patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses, the relationship between carotid plaque characteristics and transcranial Doppler (TCD)–detected microembolic signals (MES) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between macroscopically described plaque characteristics and MES in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Methods— Sequential patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy underwent preoperative 30-minute TCD monitoring of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery to detect MES. TCD signal analysis, by researchers who were blinded to patient information, was performed offline. Clinical variables of patients and macroscopic carotid plaque features seen at surgery were documented prospectively. Results— Of the 109 patients (74 male, 35 female; mean age, 68.8±8.7 years) enrolled, 71 had ipsilateral carotid territory symptoms. MES were detected in 27 of all patients (25%). Twenty-two of 71 symptomatic patients (31%) compared with 5 of 38 asymptomatic patients (13%) had MES (P =0.046). Also, symptomatic patients had more emboli (total MES counts) than asymptomatic patients (P =0.010). The presence or absence of MES was not associated with plaque characteristics. Conclusions— Our data do not confirm previous reports of an association between MES and macroscopic plaque characteristics. We hypothesize that smaller platelet aggregates and fibrin clots, which are not detected macroscopically, are the most likely sources of TCD-detected MES.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"160 1","pages":"2014-2018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source of Microembolic Signals in Patients With High-Grade Carotid Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Stork, K. Kimura, C. Levi, B. Chambers, A. Abbott, G. Donnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.STR.0000021002.17394.7F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose— In patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses, the relationship between carotid plaque characteristics and transcranial Doppler (TCD)–detected microembolic signals (MES) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between macroscopically described plaque characteristics and MES in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Methods— Sequential patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy underwent preoperative 30-minute TCD monitoring of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery to detect MES. TCD signal analysis, by researchers who were blinded to patient information, was performed offline. Clinical variables of patients and macroscopic carotid plaque features seen at surgery were documented prospectively. Results— Of the 109 patients (74 male, 35 female; mean age, 68.8±8.7 years) enrolled, 71 had ipsilateral carotid territory symptoms. MES were detected in 27 of all patients (25%). Twenty-two of 71 symptomatic patients (31%) compared with 5 of 38 asymptomatic patients (13%) had MES (P =0.046). Also, symptomatic patients had more emboli (total MES counts) than asymptomatic patients (P =0.010). The presence or absence of MES was not associated with plaque characteristics. Conclusions— Our data do not confirm previous reports of an association between MES and macroscopic plaque characteristics. We hypothesize that smaller platelet aggregates and fibrin clots, which are not detected macroscopically, are the most likely sources of TCD-detected MES.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"2014-2018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000021002.17394.7F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000021002.17394.7F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

背景与目的:在有症状和无症状的颈动脉狭窄患者中,颈动脉斑块特征与经颅多普勒(TCD)检测的微栓塞信号(MES)之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是研究宏观描述斑块特征与颈动脉内膜切除术患者MES之间的关系。方法:计划行颈动脉内膜切除术的连续患者术前30分钟对同侧大脑中动脉进行TCD监测以检测MES。TCD信号分析是由不了解患者信息的研究人员在线下进行的。前瞻性地记录了患者的临床变量和手术中观察到的宏观颈动脉斑块特征。结果:109例患者(男性74例,女性35例;平均年龄(68.8±8.7岁),71例有同侧颈动脉区域症状。27例(25%)患者检测到MES。71例有症状患者中有22例(31%)发生MES, 38例无症状患者中有5例(13%)发生MES (P =0.046)。有症状患者的栓塞(MES总计数)多于无症状患者(P =0.010)。MES的存在与否与斑块特征无关。结论:我们的数据不证实先前报道的MES与宏观斑块特征之间的关联。我们假设,较小的血小板聚集体和纤维蛋白凝块是最可能的来源,而不是宏观检测到的tcd检测到MES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Source of Microembolic Signals in Patients With High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
Background and Purpose— In patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses, the relationship between carotid plaque characteristics and transcranial Doppler (TCD)–detected microembolic signals (MES) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between macroscopically described plaque characteristics and MES in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Methods— Sequential patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy underwent preoperative 30-minute TCD monitoring of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery to detect MES. TCD signal analysis, by researchers who were blinded to patient information, was performed offline. Clinical variables of patients and macroscopic carotid plaque features seen at surgery were documented prospectively. Results— Of the 109 patients (74 male, 35 female; mean age, 68.8±8.7 years) enrolled, 71 had ipsilateral carotid territory symptoms. MES were detected in 27 of all patients (25%). Twenty-two of 71 symptomatic patients (31%) compared with 5 of 38 asymptomatic patients (13%) had MES (P =0.046). Also, symptomatic patients had more emboli (total MES counts) than asymptomatic patients (P =0.010). The presence or absence of MES was not associated with plaque characteristics. Conclusions— Our data do not confirm previous reports of an association between MES and macroscopic plaque characteristics. We hypothesize that smaller platelet aggregates and fibrin clots, which are not detected macroscopically, are the most likely sources of TCD-detected MES.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Artery Occlusion Is Associated With High-Volume Flow to the Brain and Increased Collateral Circulation Risk of Stroke Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Nested Case-Control Study Imaging-Based Decision Making in Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: Present Status Risk Factors for Falling in Home-Dwelling Older Women With Stroke: The Women’s Health and Aging Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1