Natasha Elmore, J. Burt, G. Abel, F. Maratos, J. Montague, John L Campbell, M. Roland
{"title":"调查会诊时间与患者经验之间的关系:一项初级保健的横断面研究","authors":"Natasha Elmore, J. Burt, G. Abel, F. Maratos, J. Montague, John L Campbell, M. Roland","doi":"10.3399/bjgp16X687733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Longer consultations in primary care have been linked with better quality of care and improved health-related outcomes. However, there is little evidence of any potential association between consultation length and patient experience. Aim To examine the relationship between consultation length and patient-reported communication, trust and confidence in the doctor, and overall satisfaction. Design and setting Analysis of 440 videorecorded consultations and associated patient experience questionnaires from 13 primary care practices in England. Method Patients attending a face-to-face consultation with participating GPs consented to having their consultations videoed and completed a questionnaire. Consultation length was calculated from the videorecording. Linear regression (adjusting for patient and doctor demographics) was used to investigate associations between patient experience (overall communication, trust and confidence, and overall satisfaction) and consultation length. Results There was no evidence that consultation length was associated with any of the three measures of patient experience (P >0.3 for all). Adjusted changes on a 0–100 scale per additional minute of consultation were: communication score 0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.20 to 0.25), trust and confidence in the doctor 0.07 (95% CI = −0.27 to 0.41), and satisfaction −0.14 (95% CI = −0.46 to 0.18). Conclusion The authors found no association between patient experience measures of communication and consultation length, and patients may sometimes report good experiences from very short consultations. However, longer consultations may be required to achieve clinical effectiveness and patient safety: aspects also important for achieving high quality of care. Future research should continue to study the benefits of longer consultations, particularly for patients with complex multiple conditions.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"e896 - e903"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Elmore, J. Burt, G. Abel, F. Maratos, J. Montague, John L Campbell, M. Roland\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp16X687733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Longer consultations in primary care have been linked with better quality of care and improved health-related outcomes. However, there is little evidence of any potential association between consultation length and patient experience. Aim To examine the relationship between consultation length and patient-reported communication, trust and confidence in the doctor, and overall satisfaction. Design and setting Analysis of 440 videorecorded consultations and associated patient experience questionnaires from 13 primary care practices in England. Method Patients attending a face-to-face consultation with participating GPs consented to having their consultations videoed and completed a questionnaire. Consultation length was calculated from the videorecording. Linear regression (adjusting for patient and doctor demographics) was used to investigate associations between patient experience (overall communication, trust and confidence, and overall satisfaction) and consultation length. Results There was no evidence that consultation length was associated with any of the three measures of patient experience (P >0.3 for all). Adjusted changes on a 0–100 scale per additional minute of consultation were: communication score 0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.20 to 0.25), trust and confidence in the doctor 0.07 (95% CI = −0.27 to 0.41), and satisfaction −0.14 (95% CI = −0.46 to 0.18). Conclusion The authors found no association between patient experience measures of communication and consultation length, and patients may sometimes report good experiences from very short consultations. However, longer consultations may be required to achieve clinical effectiveness and patient safety: aspects also important for achieving high quality of care. Future research should continue to study the benefits of longer consultations, particularly for patients with complex multiple conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e896 - e903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X687733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X687733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66
摘要
背景:较长的初级保健咨询与更好的护理质量和改善的健康相关结果有关。然而,几乎没有证据表明会诊时间和患者经验之间有任何潜在的联系。目的探讨会诊时间与患者报告沟通、对医生的信任和信心以及总体满意度之间的关系。设计与设置分析了英国13个初级保健实践的440个视频咨询记录和相关的患者体验问卷。方法与参与会诊的全科医生面对面会诊的患者同意进行会诊录像并填写问卷。会诊时间根据录像计算。使用线性回归(调整患者和医生的人口统计数据)来调查患者体验(总体沟通、信任和信心以及总体满意度)与咨询时间之间的关系。结果:没有证据表明会诊时间与患者体验的三种测量方法中的任何一种都相关(P >0.3)。在0-100量表上,每增加一分钟会诊的调整变化为:沟通得分0.02(95%置信区间[CI] = - 0.20至0.25),对医生的信任和信心0.07 (95% CI = - 0.27至0.41),满意度- 0.14 (95% CI = - 0.46至0.18)。结论:作者发现患者体验的沟通措施与会诊时间之间没有关联,患者有时可能会在很短的会诊中报告良好的体验。然而,为了达到临床效果和患者安全,可能需要更长时间的会诊,这些方面对于实现高质量的护理也很重要。未来的研究应该继续研究长时间咨询的好处,特别是对患有复杂多种疾病的患者。
Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care
Background Longer consultations in primary care have been linked with better quality of care and improved health-related outcomes. However, there is little evidence of any potential association between consultation length and patient experience. Aim To examine the relationship between consultation length and patient-reported communication, trust and confidence in the doctor, and overall satisfaction. Design and setting Analysis of 440 videorecorded consultations and associated patient experience questionnaires from 13 primary care practices in England. Method Patients attending a face-to-face consultation with participating GPs consented to having their consultations videoed and completed a questionnaire. Consultation length was calculated from the videorecording. Linear regression (adjusting for patient and doctor demographics) was used to investigate associations between patient experience (overall communication, trust and confidence, and overall satisfaction) and consultation length. Results There was no evidence that consultation length was associated with any of the three measures of patient experience (P >0.3 for all). Adjusted changes on a 0–100 scale per additional minute of consultation were: communication score 0.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.20 to 0.25), trust and confidence in the doctor 0.07 (95% CI = −0.27 to 0.41), and satisfaction −0.14 (95% CI = −0.46 to 0.18). Conclusion The authors found no association between patient experience measures of communication and consultation length, and patients may sometimes report good experiences from very short consultations. However, longer consultations may be required to achieve clinical effectiveness and patient safety: aspects also important for achieving high quality of care. Future research should continue to study the benefits of longer consultations, particularly for patients with complex multiple conditions.