2020年秘鲁利马部分学校教师远程工作期间压力与生活方式的相关性

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Cognition Technology & Work Pub Date : 2022-05-02 DOI:10.3233/WOR-211224
D. M. Quiñones-Laveriano, M. S. Cervera-Ocaña, Lucia Virginia Porro-Diaz, Karla Josselin Reynel, Jhony A. De La Cruz-Vargas
{"title":"2020年秘鲁利马部分学校教师远程工作期间压力与生活方式的相关性","authors":"D. M. Quiñones-Laveriano, M. S. Cervera-Ocaña, Lucia Virginia Porro-Diaz, Karla Josselin Reynel, Jhony A. De La Cruz-Vargas","doi":"10.3233/WOR-211224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nStress and unhealthy lifestyle are serious problems in public health and education, particularly due to their significant relevance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nTo determine the correlation between stress and lifestyle in teachers at some schools in Lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis observational, quantitative, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted in 217 school teachers from Lima. Lifestyle was measured using the FANTASTIC questionnaire; stress was measured using the Teaching Stress Scale (ED-6), comprised of the anxiety, depression, maladaptive beliefs, work pressure and poor coping dimensions. The Spearman correlation between numerical variables, and the difference of the FANTASTIC score according to the categorical variables, were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as necessary. Multivariable analysis was done with a multiple linear regression model to find raw and adjusted β (βa).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe median of the ED-6 scale was 81 (RI: 64-105). Sixty-four percent of the teachers had a good-excellent lifestyle; 27.2%, regular; and 8.49%, bad-dangerous. The FANTASTIC score had an inverse correlation with ED-6 (β a: -0.16, 95% ; CI: -0.20 to -0.12) adjusted for age and cohabitation with children. Likewise, teachers between 40 and 49 years old (β a: 2.89, 95% ; CI: 0.17 to 5.62) had a better lifestyle; and teachers who lived with children (βa: -5.48, 95% ; CI: -7.89 to -3.06), a worse lifestyle.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAs stress increased, the lifestyle quality worsened in teachers at some schools in Lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.","PeriodicalId":49090,"journal":{"name":"Cognition Technology & Work","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between stress and lifestyle in teachers at some schools in lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.\",\"authors\":\"D. M. Quiñones-Laveriano, M. S. Cervera-Ocaña, Lucia Virginia Porro-Diaz, Karla Josselin Reynel, Jhony A. De La Cruz-Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/WOR-211224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nStress and unhealthy lifestyle are serious problems in public health and education, particularly due to their significant relevance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVES\\nTo determine the correlation between stress and lifestyle in teachers at some schools in Lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis observational, quantitative, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted in 217 school teachers from Lima. Lifestyle was measured using the FANTASTIC questionnaire; stress was measured using the Teaching Stress Scale (ED-6), comprised of the anxiety, depression, maladaptive beliefs, work pressure and poor coping dimensions. The Spearman correlation between numerical variables, and the difference of the FANTASTIC score according to the categorical variables, were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as necessary. Multivariable analysis was done with a multiple linear regression model to find raw and adjusted β (βa).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe median of the ED-6 scale was 81 (RI: 64-105). Sixty-four percent of the teachers had a good-excellent lifestyle; 27.2%, regular; and 8.49%, bad-dangerous. The FANTASTIC score had an inverse correlation with ED-6 (β a: -0.16, 95% ; CI: -0.20 to -0.12) adjusted for age and cohabitation with children. Likewise, teachers between 40 and 49 years old (β a: 2.89, 95% ; CI: 0.17 to 5.62) had a better lifestyle; and teachers who lived with children (βa: -5.48, 95% ; CI: -7.89 to -3.06), a worse lifestyle.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nAs stress increased, the lifestyle quality worsened in teachers at some schools in Lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition Technology & Work\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition Technology & Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition Technology & Work","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

压力和不健康的生活方式是公共卫生和教育中的严重问题,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下。目的了解2020年秘鲁利马部分学校教师远程办公期间压力与生活方式的相关性。方法对利马217名学校教师进行观察性、定量、分析性、横断面研究。生活方式采用FANTASTIC问卷进行测量;压力采用教学压力量表(ED-6)进行测量,包括焦虑、抑郁、适应不良信念、工作压力和应对不良四个维度。数值变量之间的Spearman相关性和分类变量之间的FANTASTIC分数差异,根据需要使用Mann-Whitney U检验或Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。采用多元线性回归模型进行多变量分析,寻找原始和调整后的β (βa)。结果ED-6评分中位数为81 (RI: 64-105)。64%的教师拥有良好的生活方式;27.2%,常规;8.49%的人认为非常危险。FANTASTIC评分与ED-6呈负相关(β a: -0.16, 95%;CI: -0.20至-0.12),调整了年龄和是否与孩子同居的因素。同样,40 - 49岁的教师(β a: 2.89, 95%;CI: 0.17 - 5.62)有更好的生活方式;与孩子一起生活的教师(βa: -5.48, 95%;CI: -7.89至-3.06),生活方式更差。结论2020年秘鲁利马市部分学校教师远程办公期间生活方式质量随着压力的增加而恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation between stress and lifestyle in teachers at some schools in lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.
BACKGROUND Stress and unhealthy lifestyle are serious problems in public health and education, particularly due to their significant relevance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES To determine the correlation between stress and lifestyle in teachers at some schools in Lima, Peru, during telework in 2020. METHODS This observational, quantitative, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted in 217 school teachers from Lima. Lifestyle was measured using the FANTASTIC questionnaire; stress was measured using the Teaching Stress Scale (ED-6), comprised of the anxiety, depression, maladaptive beliefs, work pressure and poor coping dimensions. The Spearman correlation between numerical variables, and the difference of the FANTASTIC score according to the categorical variables, were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as necessary. Multivariable analysis was done with a multiple linear regression model to find raw and adjusted β (βa). RESULTS The median of the ED-6 scale was 81 (RI: 64-105). Sixty-four percent of the teachers had a good-excellent lifestyle; 27.2%, regular; and 8.49%, bad-dangerous. The FANTASTIC score had an inverse correlation with ED-6 (β a: -0.16, 95% ; CI: -0.20 to -0.12) adjusted for age and cohabitation with children. Likewise, teachers between 40 and 49 years old (β a: 2.89, 95% ; CI: 0.17 to 5.62) had a better lifestyle; and teachers who lived with children (βa: -5.48, 95% ; CI: -7.89 to -3.06), a worse lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS As stress increased, the lifestyle quality worsened in teachers at some schools in Lima, Peru, during telework in 2020.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition Technology & Work
Cognition Technology & Work ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognition, Technology & Work focuses on the practical issues of human interaction with technology within the context of work and, in particular, how human cognition affects, and is affected by, work and working conditions. The aim is to publish research that normally resides on the borderline between people, technology, and organisations. Including how people use information technology, how experience and expertise develop through work, and how incidents and accidents are due to the interaction between individual, technical and organisational factors. The target is thus the study of people at work from a cognitive systems engineering and socio-technical systems perspective. The most relevant working contexts of interest to CTW are those where the impact of modern technologies on people at work is particularly important for the users involved as well as for the effects on the environment and plants. Modern society has come to depend on the safe and efficient functioning of a multitude of technological systems as diverse as industrial production, transportation, communication, supply of energy, information and materials, health and finance.
期刊最新文献
The effect of moderate broadband noise on cognitive performance: a systematic review Should prohibition signs always be designed as bar-over-pictogram in traffic and non-traffic contexts? Sustainable employability, technology acceptance and task performance in workers collaborating with cobots: a pilot study The dual impact of technological tools on health and technostress among older workers: an integrative literature review Influence of whole-body vibration on the cognitive ability of reasoning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1