用分级法和层次分析法评价沿海无承压含水层应力指数

N. Somaratne
{"title":"用分级法和层次分析法评价沿海无承压含水层应力指数","authors":"N. Somaratne","doi":"10.5539/ENRR.V9N1P35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small groundwater basins are highly vulnerable to over draft and susceptible to droughts as they are locally recharged. The sustainable development and management of groundwater basins therefore benefits from quantitative assessment of the basin status in terms of the current stress level. This paper introduces the Aquifer Stress Index (ASI) using a rating method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a widely used multi-criteria decision support technique. Six evaluation criteria were used to determine the ASI; water levels, water quality, groundwater pumping, saline water intrusion, recharge and land use threat. For each criterion, a rating score and weight are used to evaluate the stress level. Rating scores for criteria were assigned based on multiple datasets obtained from the field investigations. Weightings for criteria were determined by pairwise comparison of AHP process. Based on the ASI, five characteristic stress regimes of the aquifers are defined: no stress, low stress, moderate stress, high stress and extreme stress. The stress level indicates the extent of groundwater availability and current development impact on the aquifer integrity. The method was applied in detail to Uley South coastal aquifer, and results indicate that the overall stress level of the aquifer is moderate. This research indicates that declining water levels are the major cause of Uley South basin’s aquifer stress, due to ongoing extractions and reduced long-term recharge. Depending on the aquifer stress level, management plans can be developed for sustainable use of the aquifer to help ensure current and future water security.","PeriodicalId":11699,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Aquifer Stress Index (ASI) Using Rating Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process for a Coastal Unconfined Aquifer\",\"authors\":\"N. Somaratne\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/ENRR.V9N1P35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small groundwater basins are highly vulnerable to over draft and susceptible to droughts as they are locally recharged. The sustainable development and management of groundwater basins therefore benefits from quantitative assessment of the basin status in terms of the current stress level. This paper introduces the Aquifer Stress Index (ASI) using a rating method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a widely used multi-criteria decision support technique. Six evaluation criteria were used to determine the ASI; water levels, water quality, groundwater pumping, saline water intrusion, recharge and land use threat. For each criterion, a rating score and weight are used to evaluate the stress level. Rating scores for criteria were assigned based on multiple datasets obtained from the field investigations. Weightings for criteria were determined by pairwise comparison of AHP process. Based on the ASI, five characteristic stress regimes of the aquifers are defined: no stress, low stress, moderate stress, high stress and extreme stress. The stress level indicates the extent of groundwater availability and current development impact on the aquifer integrity. The method was applied in detail to Uley South coastal aquifer, and results indicate that the overall stress level of the aquifer is moderate. This research indicates that declining water levels are the major cause of Uley South basin’s aquifer stress, due to ongoing extractions and reduced long-term recharge. Depending on the aquifer stress level, management plans can be developed for sustainable use of the aquifer to help ensure current and future water security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Natural Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Natural Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/ENRR.V9N1P35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ENRR.V9N1P35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

小型地下水盆地由于在当地补给,极易受到过度取水和干旱的影响。因此,根据当前压力水平对流域状况进行定量评估有利于地下水流域的可持续发展和管理。本文采用一种评价方法和一种广泛应用的多准则决策支持技术——层次分析法对含水层应力指数进行了介绍。6个评价标准用于确定ASI;水位、水质、地下水抽取、盐水入侵、补给和土地利用威胁。对于每个标准,使用评级分数和权重来评估应力水平。根据从实地调查中获得的多个数据集分配标准评级分数。各指标的权重由层次分析法两两比较确定。在此基础上,定义了无应力、低应力、中等应力、高应力和极端应力5种含水层特征应力状态。应力水平表示地下水可利用程度和当前开发对含水层完整性的影响。将该方法详细应用于Uley南岸含水层,结果表明该含水层的整体应力水平为中等。该研究表明,由于持续的开采和长期补给的减少,水位下降是Uley South盆地含水层应力的主要原因。根据含水层压力水平,可以制定含水层可持续利用的管理计划,以帮助确保当前和未来的水安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Aquifer Stress Index (ASI) Using Rating Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process for a Coastal Unconfined Aquifer
Small groundwater basins are highly vulnerable to over draft and susceptible to droughts as they are locally recharged. The sustainable development and management of groundwater basins therefore benefits from quantitative assessment of the basin status in terms of the current stress level. This paper introduces the Aquifer Stress Index (ASI) using a rating method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a widely used multi-criteria decision support technique. Six evaluation criteria were used to determine the ASI; water levels, water quality, groundwater pumping, saline water intrusion, recharge and land use threat. For each criterion, a rating score and weight are used to evaluate the stress level. Rating scores for criteria were assigned based on multiple datasets obtained from the field investigations. Weightings for criteria were determined by pairwise comparison of AHP process. Based on the ASI, five characteristic stress regimes of the aquifers are defined: no stress, low stress, moderate stress, high stress and extreme stress. The stress level indicates the extent of groundwater availability and current development impact on the aquifer integrity. The method was applied in detail to Uley South coastal aquifer, and results indicate that the overall stress level of the aquifer is moderate. This research indicates that declining water levels are the major cause of Uley South basin’s aquifer stress, due to ongoing extractions and reduced long-term recharge. Depending on the aquifer stress level, management plans can be developed for sustainable use of the aquifer to help ensure current and future water security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrogen Supply Chains Downstream – A Systematic Analysis of The Western U.S. Tackling Environmental Problems: Are People and the Environment Antithetical? Spatiotemporal Dynamic of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Their Drivers in the Fincha' a-Neshe Sub-Basin, Southeastern Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia Influence of Different Land Management Systems on the Dynamics of Carbon Biodegradability and Nitrogen Mineralization in a Sudanian Savanah Grasslands Soil, Western Burkina Faso Perception and Resilience Strategies of Livestock Farmers and Agro-Pastoralists Affected by Climate Change: Case of the urban commune of Tera, Niger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1