{"title":"情况变得更糟:居民对葡萄牙“特别搬迁计划”的回应,正如其他社区所表达的那样","authors":"Emily Knudson-Vilaseca","doi":"10.1386/ijis_00089_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the larger discussion about the persistent and worldwide problem of access to adequate housing, I examine in this article the effects of government-led rehousing efforts in Lisbon, Portugal, through the lens of filmic representations of those effects. Specifically, I look at how residents of both the self-built neighbourhoods (demolished or soon-to-be) and public housing responded to the Projeto Especial de Realojamento through an analysis of two films, the documentary Outros Bairros and the fictional short film Nada Fazi , which represent a sort of ‘before and after’ of those government efforts. The residents’ voices and stories are compared to each other and set against a backdrop of journalistic reporting and sociological studies.","PeriodicalId":41910,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IBERIAN STUDIES","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mudado para Pior: Residents’ responses to Portugal’s ‘Special Rehousing Program’ as expressed in Outros Bairros and Nada Fazi\",\"authors\":\"Emily Knudson-Vilaseca\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/ijis_00089_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As part of the larger discussion about the persistent and worldwide problem of access to adequate housing, I examine in this article the effects of government-led rehousing efforts in Lisbon, Portugal, through the lens of filmic representations of those effects. Specifically, I look at how residents of both the self-built neighbourhoods (demolished or soon-to-be) and public housing responded to the Projeto Especial de Realojamento through an analysis of two films, the documentary Outros Bairros and the fictional short film Nada Fazi , which represent a sort of ‘before and after’ of those government efforts. The residents’ voices and stories are compared to each other and set against a backdrop of journalistic reporting and sociological studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IBERIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IBERIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/ijis_00089_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IBERIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ijis_00089_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mudado para Pior: Residents’ responses to Portugal’s ‘Special Rehousing Program’ as expressed in Outros Bairros and Nada Fazi
As part of the larger discussion about the persistent and worldwide problem of access to adequate housing, I examine in this article the effects of government-led rehousing efforts in Lisbon, Portugal, through the lens of filmic representations of those effects. Specifically, I look at how residents of both the self-built neighbourhoods (demolished or soon-to-be) and public housing responded to the Projeto Especial de Realojamento through an analysis of two films, the documentary Outros Bairros and the fictional short film Nada Fazi , which represent a sort of ‘before and after’ of those government efforts. The residents’ voices and stories are compared to each other and set against a backdrop of journalistic reporting and sociological studies.