波兰版的幸福感问卷-三个因素而不是一个

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Health Psychology Report Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.5114/HPR.2018.75684
Maria Kłym-Guba, D. Karaś
{"title":"波兰版的幸福感问卷-三个因素而不是一个","authors":"Maria Kłym-Guba, D. Karaś","doi":"10.5114/HPR.2018.75684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"participants and procedure The main objective of the present research was to determine the psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) and to verify the structure of the construct. Four studies were performed with a total of 2273 participants. The psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of the QEWB were proven. To verify the factorial structure, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used, as well as exploratory structural equation modeling. The factor analysis showed that although assessing the general score of the QEWB is justified, the three-factorial structure fit best (CFI from .929 to .963 and RMSEA from .038 to .052 in all four studies). The criterion validity of the three factors was tested using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF), measures of procrastination (PPS, NAPS), personality traits (IPIP-BMF-20) and grit (Grit-S).","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"84 1","pages":"273-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polish version of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being – three factors rather than one\",\"authors\":\"Maria Kłym-Guba, D. Karaś\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/HPR.2018.75684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"participants and procedure The main objective of the present research was to determine the psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) and to verify the structure of the construct. Four studies were performed with a total of 2273 participants. The psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of the QEWB were proven. To verify the factorial structure, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used, as well as exploratory structural equation modeling. The factor analysis showed that although assessing the general score of the QEWB is justified, the three-factorial structure fit best (CFI from .929 to .963 and RMSEA from .038 to .052 in all four studies). The criterion validity of the three factors was tested using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF), measures of procrastination (PPS, NAPS), personality traits (IPIP-BMF-20) and grit (Grit-S).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Report\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"273-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/HPR.2018.75684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/HPR.2018.75684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究的主要目的是确定波兰版幸福感问卷(QEWB)的心理测量特性,并验证该构式的结构。共进行了四项研究,共有2273名参与者。证明了波兰版QEWB的心理测量特性。为了验证因子结构,采用探索性和验证性因子分析,以及探索性结构方程建模。因子分析显示,虽然评估QEWB的总得分是合理的,但三因子结构最适合(所有四项研究的CFI从0.929到0.963,RMSEA从0.038到0.052)。采用心理健康连续简表(MHC-SF)、拖延症量表(PPS、NAPS)、人格特征量表(IPIP-BMF-20)和毅力量表(grit - s)对三个因素进行效度测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polish version of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being – three factors rather than one
participants and procedure The main objective of the present research was to determine the psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) and to verify the structure of the construct. Four studies were performed with a total of 2273 participants. The psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of the QEWB were proven. To verify the factorial structure, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used, as well as exploratory structural equation modeling. The factor analysis showed that although assessing the general score of the QEWB is justified, the three-factorial structure fit best (CFI from .929 to .963 and RMSEA from .038 to .052 in all four studies). The criterion validity of the three factors was tested using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF), measures of procrastination (PPS, NAPS), personality traits (IPIP-BMF-20) and grit (Grit-S).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Report
Health Psychology Report PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-term effectiveness of music therapy songwriting for mental health outcomes of at-risk parents in the NICU: a study protocol of an international multicenter mixed-methods trial. Exploring the key drivers of responsive parenting in mothers and fathers - observed and self-reported responsiveness. Becoming a father: a qualitative study on the journey to fatherhood Perceived stress and life satisfaction in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of fear of childbirth and self-esteem Anxiety and coping during COVID-19. Investigation of anxiety management types in a German and Polish sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1