韩国的经济危机和财政措施:亚洲金融危机、全球金融危机和新冠肺炎

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-18 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2022.2075220
Taiwon Ha
{"title":"韩国的经济危机和财政措施:亚洲金融危机、全球金融危机和新冠肺炎","authors":"Taiwon Ha","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2022.2075220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study conducts a changes-in-changes analysis to identify the adverse effects of three economic crises and the countercyclical stabilisation effect of the welfare system in South Korea. First, the crises commonly delivered disproportionate effects and the economically vulnerable experienced more severe damages. Second, even though the welfare system has better mitigated negative impacts during the recent crises thanks to welfare expansion, it still provided limited coverage and insufficient benefits. Therefore, the Korean government introduced the Emergency Disaster Relief Funds as the first-ever one-off universal benefit, but it did not mitigate early damages and had temporary positive effects. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic crises and fiscal measures in South Korea: Asian Financial Crisis, Global Financial Crisis, and COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Taiwon Ha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17516234.2022.2075220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This study conducts a changes-in-changes analysis to identify the adverse effects of three economic crises and the countercyclical stabilisation effect of the welfare system in South Korea. First, the crises commonly delivered disproportionate effects and the economically vulnerable experienced more severe damages. Second, even though the welfare system has better mitigated negative impacts during the recent crises thanks to welfare expansion, it still provided limited coverage and insufficient benefits. Therefore, the Korean government introduced the Emergency Disaster Relief Funds as the first-ever one-off universal benefit, but it did not mitigate early damages and had temporary positive effects. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2022.2075220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2022.2075220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 本研究进行了变化中的变化分析,以确定三次经济危机的不利影响和韩国福利制度的反周期稳定效应。首先,危机通常造成了不成比例的影响,经济上脆弱的国家遭受了更严重的损害。其次,尽管福利制度在最近的危机中由于福利扩张而更好地减轻了负面影响,但它仍然提供了有限的覆盖范围和不足的福利。因此,韩国政府作为第一个一次性的普遍救助,引入了紧急灾难救助基金,但它并没有减轻早期损失,而是起到了暂时的积极作用。©2022 Informa UK Limited,以Taylor & Francis Group的名义交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic crises and fiscal measures in South Korea: Asian Financial Crisis, Global Financial Crisis, and COVID-19
. This study conducts a changes-in-changes analysis to identify the adverse effects of three economic crises and the countercyclical stabilisation effect of the welfare system in South Korea. First, the crises commonly delivered disproportionate effects and the economically vulnerable experienced more severe damages. Second, even though the welfare system has better mitigated negative impacts during the recent crises thanks to welfare expansion, it still provided limited coverage and insufficient benefits. Therefore, the Korean government introduced the Emergency Disaster Relief Funds as the first-ever one-off universal benefit, but it did not mitigate early damages and had temporary positive effects. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Empowering women in academia: navigating institutional dynamics, gender roles, and personal pursuits among female researchers in Norwegian higher education University policies on generative AI in Asia: promising practices, gaps, and future directions Unleashing generative AI: funding implications and insights from China Perceptions of distributive justice and public attitudes towards government welfare responsibility in China: moderating role of urban-rural and regional difference Socio-economic inequalities in climate policies: unpacking energy efficiency barriers in low-income households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1