美国最高法院,1971-1972年

P. Bartholomew
{"title":"美国最高法院,1971-1972年","authors":"P. Bartholomew","doi":"10.1177/106591297202500414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IF THE HISTORIANS of the future set a \"watershed\" point between the \"Warren Court\" and the \"Burger Court\" the recent term of the Court undoubtedly will be a part of that dividing line. The close vote in a considerable number of cases was one indication of a transitional stage. Too, in this term the nature of a remarkable number of the cases supported the proposition that this is a public law court. Once again the Court operated without a full complement of justices for much of its term. The death of Associate Justice Hugo L. Black before the opening of the term and the retirement and later death of Associate Justice John M. Harlan left only seven justices participating in proceedings until Lewis F. Powell and William H. Rehnquist took the oath on January 7, 1972. Even then there was a period of abstention by them from voting and decisions because they had not been present for the oral arguments. As to the statistical \"box score\" for the term, the Court disposed of a total of 3,645 cases, a new all-time record. In the 1970-71 term it was 3,322 (as corrected in the publication of this year's statistics) and in the 1969-70 term the total was 3,409. The number of cases remaining on the docket declined slightly from the previous term's 890 to 888. Cases argued went to 176 (including one of original jurisdiction now pending) from the 151 and 144 respectively of the two previous terms. A rather dramatic increase came in the number of cases disposed of by signed opinions, 143 by 129 signed opinions compared with 126 by 109 signed opinions in the previous term. Per curiam opinions remained stable with 24 this term and 22 the previous term. Cases set for reargument this term were 5 compared with 3 in the 1970-71 term.","PeriodicalId":83314,"journal":{"name":"The Western political quarterly","volume":"12 1","pages":"761 - 788"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1972-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Supreme Court of the United States, 1971-1972\",\"authors\":\"P. Bartholomew\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/106591297202500414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IF THE HISTORIANS of the future set a \\\"watershed\\\" point between the \\\"Warren Court\\\" and the \\\"Burger Court\\\" the recent term of the Court undoubtedly will be a part of that dividing line. The close vote in a considerable number of cases was one indication of a transitional stage. Too, in this term the nature of a remarkable number of the cases supported the proposition that this is a public law court. Once again the Court operated without a full complement of justices for much of its term. The death of Associate Justice Hugo L. Black before the opening of the term and the retirement and later death of Associate Justice John M. Harlan left only seven justices participating in proceedings until Lewis F. Powell and William H. Rehnquist took the oath on January 7, 1972. Even then there was a period of abstention by them from voting and decisions because they had not been present for the oral arguments. As to the statistical \\\"box score\\\" for the term, the Court disposed of a total of 3,645 cases, a new all-time record. In the 1970-71 term it was 3,322 (as corrected in the publication of this year's statistics) and in the 1969-70 term the total was 3,409. The number of cases remaining on the docket declined slightly from the previous term's 890 to 888. Cases argued went to 176 (including one of original jurisdiction now pending) from the 151 and 144 respectively of the two previous terms. A rather dramatic increase came in the number of cases disposed of by signed opinions, 143 by 129 signed opinions compared with 126 by 109 signed opinions in the previous term. Per curiam opinions remained stable with 24 this term and 22 the previous term. Cases set for reargument this term were 5 compared with 3 in the 1970-71 term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Western political quarterly\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"761 - 788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1972-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Western political quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/106591297202500414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Western political quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/106591297202500414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果未来的历史学家在“沃伦法院”和“伯格法院”之间设定一个“分水岭”,那么法院最近的任期无疑将成为这条分界线的一部分。在相当多的情况下,票数接近是过渡阶段的一个迹象。同样,在这个术语中,大量案件的性质支持了这是一个公法法院的主张。在最高法院的大部分任期内,法官人数又一次不足。大法官雨果·l·布莱克在任期开始前去世,大法官约翰·m·哈兰退休后去世,使得只有7名大法官参与诉讼,直到刘易斯·f·鲍威尔和威廉·h·伦奎斯特于1972年1月7日宣誓就职。即使在那时,他们也有一段时间没有投票和作出决定,因为他们没有出席口头辩论。在这一任期的统计“盒子分数”方面,法院共处理了3 645起案件,创下历史新高。在1970-71年期间,这一数字为3,322(在今年公布的统计数据中进行了更正),而在1969-70年期间,总数为3,409。待审案件的数量从上一届的890件略有下降至888件。辩论案件从前两届的151件和144件分别增加到176件(包括一件未决的原始管辖权案件)。以签署意见书的方式处理的案件从上届的126件(109件)增加到现在的143件(129件)。委员会的意见保持稳定,本届为24项,上届为22项。本学期要求重新辩论的案件有5起,而1970-71年期间为3起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1971-1972
IF THE HISTORIANS of the future set a "watershed" point between the "Warren Court" and the "Burger Court" the recent term of the Court undoubtedly will be a part of that dividing line. The close vote in a considerable number of cases was one indication of a transitional stage. Too, in this term the nature of a remarkable number of the cases supported the proposition that this is a public law court. Once again the Court operated without a full complement of justices for much of its term. The death of Associate Justice Hugo L. Black before the opening of the term and the retirement and later death of Associate Justice John M. Harlan left only seven justices participating in proceedings until Lewis F. Powell and William H. Rehnquist took the oath on January 7, 1972. Even then there was a period of abstention by them from voting and decisions because they had not been present for the oral arguments. As to the statistical "box score" for the term, the Court disposed of a total of 3,645 cases, a new all-time record. In the 1970-71 term it was 3,322 (as corrected in the publication of this year's statistics) and in the 1969-70 term the total was 3,409. The number of cases remaining on the docket declined slightly from the previous term's 890 to 888. Cases argued went to 176 (including one of original jurisdiction now pending) from the 151 and 144 respectively of the two previous terms. A rather dramatic increase came in the number of cases disposed of by signed opinions, 143 by 129 signed opinions compared with 126 by 109 signed opinions in the previous term. Per curiam opinions remained stable with 24 this term and 22 the previous term. Cases set for reargument this term were 5 compared with 3 in the 1970-71 term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability. Bicameralism and the Theory of Voting Party, Ideology, and the Lure of Victory: Iowa Activists in the 1980 Prenomination Campaign Campaign Spending in Contests for Governor The End of Methodology? a Review Essay On Evaluation Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1