等长后放松与相互抑制技术对腘绳肌柔韧性的影响

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI:10.21649/akemu.v28i2.5112
Asma Aleem, Muhammad Arfan, A. Razzaq, Rooh ul Husnain Khizar, Mehboob Ali
{"title":"等长后放松与相互抑制技术对腘绳肌柔韧性的影响","authors":"Asma Aleem, Muhammad Arfan, A. Razzaq, Rooh ul Husnain Khizar, Mehboob Ali","doi":"10.21649/akemu.v28i2.5112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To expand the muscular extensibility, alternation of muscle energy techniques have been upheld, yet proof present to help the general value of a specific methodology. Two strategies of muscle energy techniques have been explored in the osteopathic writing that differs principally in the group of muscles focused on. Objective: The objective of our study was to find out the effectiveness of post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhabitation technique on hamstring muscle flexibility among students of Johar Institute of Professional Studies Lahore. Methods: The Quasi-experimental study was for comparison of two Relaxation Techniques with 50 healthy students of both gender were recruited by non-probability convenient sampling technique from different department of Johar Institute \nst of Professional Studies Lahore from 1 October to March 2020. For enrolling the subjects in this study we used convenience sampling technique. Furthermore, 50 subjects were selected on the basis of inclusion exclusion criteria and were arbitrarily divided in to two groups with 25 in each group. Hamstring length was assessed using AKE test. For intervention, Group A performed post isometrics relaxation and Group B performed Reciprocal Inhibition Technique. Knee range of motion was assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Universal Goniometer were assessment tools accessed for all patients before and after 4 weeks of physical therapy intervention. Data were documented and analysis was done using SPSS version 20. Paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test was applied to find association between the variables of hypothesis. Results: In both groups, the pre-intervention and post-intervention measurements by statistical analysis found that there is significant improvement in hamstring muscle flexibility with P value ≤ 0.05 for both right side and left side. Conclusion: The current study found out that both post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhibition are equally beneficial in the treatment of tight hamstrings.","PeriodicalId":43918,"journal":{"name":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Post Isometric Relaxation Versus Reciprocal Inhibition Technique on Hamstring Muscle Flexibility\",\"authors\":\"Asma Aleem, Muhammad Arfan, A. Razzaq, Rooh ul Husnain Khizar, Mehboob Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.21649/akemu.v28i2.5112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To expand the muscular extensibility, alternation of muscle energy techniques have been upheld, yet proof present to help the general value of a specific methodology. Two strategies of muscle energy techniques have been explored in the osteopathic writing that differs principally in the group of muscles focused on. Objective: The objective of our study was to find out the effectiveness of post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhabitation technique on hamstring muscle flexibility among students of Johar Institute of Professional Studies Lahore. Methods: The Quasi-experimental study was for comparison of two Relaxation Techniques with 50 healthy students of both gender were recruited by non-probability convenient sampling technique from different department of Johar Institute \\nst of Professional Studies Lahore from 1 October to March 2020. For enrolling the subjects in this study we used convenience sampling technique. Furthermore, 50 subjects were selected on the basis of inclusion exclusion criteria and were arbitrarily divided in to two groups with 25 in each group. Hamstring length was assessed using AKE test. For intervention, Group A performed post isometrics relaxation and Group B performed Reciprocal Inhibition Technique. Knee range of motion was assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Universal Goniometer were assessment tools accessed for all patients before and after 4 weeks of physical therapy intervention. Data were documented and analysis was done using SPSS version 20. Paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test was applied to find association between the variables of hypothesis. Results: In both groups, the pre-intervention and post-intervention measurements by statistical analysis found that there is significant improvement in hamstring muscle flexibility with P value ≤ 0.05 for both right side and left side. Conclusion: The current study found out that both post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhibition are equally beneficial in the treatment of tight hamstrings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v28i2.5112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v28i2.5112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:为了扩大肌肉的可伸伸性,肌肉能量技术的交替一直被支持,但目前的证据有助于特定方法的一般价值。肌肉能量技术的两种策略已经在骨科写作中进行了探索,主要不同于所关注的肌肉群。目的:研究拉合尔Johar职业学院学生进行等长后放松和互惠居住技术对腘绳肌柔韧性的影响。方法:采用非概率方便抽样方法,于2020年10月1日至2020年3月从拉合尔Johar职业学院不同院系招收50名男女健康学生,进行两种放松技术的准实验研究。本研究采用方便抽样方法招募研究对象。根据纳入排除标准选择50例受试者,随机分为两组,每组25例。采用AKE试验评估腘绳肌长度。干预时,A组采用后等距松弛法,B组采用互抑法。评估干预前和干预后的膝关节活动度。数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)和通用角计是所有患者在物理治疗干预前和4周后使用的评估工具。数据记录和分析使用SPSS版本20完成。采用配对样本t检验和独立样本t检验来发现假设变量之间的相关性。结果:通过统计分析,两组患者干预前和干预后腘绳肌柔韧性均有显著改善,且左右侧均P值≤0.05。结论:本研究发现,等距后放松和相互抑制对腘绳肌紧绷的治疗同样有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Post Isometric Relaxation Versus Reciprocal Inhibition Technique on Hamstring Muscle Flexibility
Background: To expand the muscular extensibility, alternation of muscle energy techniques have been upheld, yet proof present to help the general value of a specific methodology. Two strategies of muscle energy techniques have been explored in the osteopathic writing that differs principally in the group of muscles focused on. Objective: The objective of our study was to find out the effectiveness of post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhabitation technique on hamstring muscle flexibility among students of Johar Institute of Professional Studies Lahore. Methods: The Quasi-experimental study was for comparison of two Relaxation Techniques with 50 healthy students of both gender were recruited by non-probability convenient sampling technique from different department of Johar Institute st of Professional Studies Lahore from 1 October to March 2020. For enrolling the subjects in this study we used convenience sampling technique. Furthermore, 50 subjects were selected on the basis of inclusion exclusion criteria and were arbitrarily divided in to two groups with 25 in each group. Hamstring length was assessed using AKE test. For intervention, Group A performed post isometrics relaxation and Group B performed Reciprocal Inhibition Technique. Knee range of motion was assessed pre-intervention and post-intervention. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Universal Goniometer were assessment tools accessed for all patients before and after 4 weeks of physical therapy intervention. Data were documented and analysis was done using SPSS version 20. Paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test was applied to find association between the variables of hypothesis. Results: In both groups, the pre-intervention and post-intervention measurements by statistical analysis found that there is significant improvement in hamstring muscle flexibility with P value ≤ 0.05 for both right side and left side. Conclusion: The current study found out that both post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhibition are equally beneficial in the treatment of tight hamstrings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vaccination Readiness of COVID-19 and Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Among Young Adults: The Mediated Role of Health and Wellbeing THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: NURTURING A MEDICAL JOURNAL'S QUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL INDEXATION AND IMPACT FACTOR Comparison of Slit Lamp Teaching Versus Bedside Teaching in Post Graduate Ophthalmology Residency at a Teaching Hospital Effective Application and Outcome of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Management of Complex Wounds with External Fixator Prevalence of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis and its Impact on Hand Grip Strength and Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1