父母和专业人士对唐氏综合症儿童残疾程度的看法

Mukta Bhattacharya, Peter Sidebotham
{"title":"父母和专业人士对唐氏综合症儿童残疾程度的看法","authors":"Mukta Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Peter Sidebotham","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00076.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Objectives, subjects and methods</b> A study was undertaken to determine whether parents of children with Down's syndrome view their child's levels of disability differently from their medical assessments. Questionnaires, based on a standard medical assessment were sent to the parents of 72 children with Down's syndrome aged 0–18 years. Data on the children's most recent medical assessment were obtained from the special needs module of the child health computer.</p>\n <p><b>Results</b> From the 47 returned questionnaires, there were no significant differences in parental and professional assessments of the children's mobility, hand function or hearing. Parents rated their child's vision, behaviour, health and growth, and personal care as significantly more impaired than did the doctors, but rated their speech and language as less impaired.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions</b> This study suggests that there are some differences between parental and professional assessments of disability levels in children with Down's syndrome and that medical assessments could take a more family-orientated approach.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100075,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Child Health","volume":"6 3","pages":"153-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00076.x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental and professional perceptions of the levels of disability in children with Down's syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Mukta Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Peter Sidebotham\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00076.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><b>Objectives, subjects and methods</b> A study was undertaken to determine whether parents of children with Down's syndrome view their child's levels of disability differently from their medical assessments. Questionnaires, based on a standard medical assessment were sent to the parents of 72 children with Down's syndrome aged 0–18 years. Data on the children's most recent medical assessment were obtained from the special needs module of the child health computer.</p>\\n <p><b>Results</b> From the 47 returned questionnaires, there were no significant differences in parental and professional assessments of the children's mobility, hand function or hearing. Parents rated their child's vision, behaviour, health and growth, and personal care as significantly more impaired than did the doctors, but rated their speech and language as less impaired.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions</b> This study suggests that there are some differences between parental and professional assessments of disability levels in children with Down's syndrome and that medical assessments could take a more family-orientated approach.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambulatory Child Health\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"153-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00076.x\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambulatory Child Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00076.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00076.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的、对象和方法进行了一项研究,以确定患有唐氏综合症的儿童的父母是否认为他们的孩子的残疾程度与他们的医学评估不同。根据标准的医学评估,向72名年龄在0-18岁的唐氏综合症儿童的父母发送了调查问卷。儿童最近的医疗评估数据来自儿童健康计算机的特殊需要模块。结果从收到的47份问卷中,父母和专业人员对儿童行动能力、手功能和听力的评估无显著差异。父母认为孩子的视力、行为、健康和成长以及个人护理受到的损害比医生严重得多,但他们认为孩子的言语和语言受到的损害较小。结论本研究提示父母对唐氏综合症儿童残疾水平的评估与专业评估存在一定差异,医学评估可以采取更以家庭为导向的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental and professional perceptions of the levels of disability in children with Down's syndrome

Objectives, subjects and methods A study was undertaken to determine whether parents of children with Down's syndrome view their child's levels of disability differently from their medical assessments. Questionnaires, based on a standard medical assessment were sent to the parents of 72 children with Down's syndrome aged 0–18 years. Data on the children's most recent medical assessment were obtained from the special needs module of the child health computer.

Results From the 47 returned questionnaires, there were no significant differences in parental and professional assessments of the children's mobility, hand function or hearing. Parents rated their child's vision, behaviour, health and growth, and personal care as significantly more impaired than did the doctors, but rated their speech and language as less impaired.

Conclusions This study suggests that there are some differences between parental and professional assessments of disability levels in children with Down's syndrome and that medical assessments could take a more family-orientated approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The greatest impact of war and conflict Child, adolescent and student health monitor Social gradients in child health: why do they occur and what can paediatricians do about them? Current literature Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1