五个组织政策制定过程中的理论与实践差距

N. Yusof, Sri Widias Asnam, A. S. Anas, Nur Suraya Mustapha, N. Emran, Norzaini Azman
{"title":"五个组织政策制定过程中的理论与实践差距","authors":"N. Yusof, Sri Widias Asnam, A. S. Anas, Nur Suraya Mustapha, N. Emran, Norzaini Azman","doi":"10.14203/STIPM.2019.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy making is an integral part of policy studies. Theoretically the process of developing a policy document is neither easy nor simple. Far from merely copying the policy provisions of other countries, the process of developing a policy document must go through specific steps and procedures commonly known as policy cycle with each cycle serves specific functions. Although bench-making study is highly encouraged, it is also preferable for policymakers to align the policy making exercise in accordance to proven theory, model, method and process. Not many know about all these processes and steps. Some very senior and seasoned policymakers even think that there is no need for them to learn and pursue knowledge in policymaking simply because they have long years of practical experiences in developing, formulating, implementing, enforcing and subsequently analyzing and evaluating policies. This article reports case studies involving five national policy documents and internal policies at several key governmental department and organizations. The findings from the study enables the researchers to make a comparison between the theory of policy making and the practice of policy making in Malaysia. The findings show that there is still a huge gap between theory and practice in policymaking and policy studies in Malaysia. There are instances where few policy makers or top management personnel choose not to follow or ignorant about the steps of policy cycles. Although policy studies might have a very bright future in Malaysia but the journey in educating relevant parties would be a long one beginning with a correct perception and willingness to change attitudes.     Keywords; policy studies, policy cycle, policy making process","PeriodicalId":31881,"journal":{"name":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical And Practical Gaps In Policy Making Process In Five Organizations\",\"authors\":\"N. Yusof, Sri Widias Asnam, A. S. Anas, Nur Suraya Mustapha, N. Emran, Norzaini Azman\",\"doi\":\"10.14203/STIPM.2019.157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy making is an integral part of policy studies. Theoretically the process of developing a policy document is neither easy nor simple. Far from merely copying the policy provisions of other countries, the process of developing a policy document must go through specific steps and procedures commonly known as policy cycle with each cycle serves specific functions. Although bench-making study is highly encouraged, it is also preferable for policymakers to align the policy making exercise in accordance to proven theory, model, method and process. Not many know about all these processes and steps. Some very senior and seasoned policymakers even think that there is no need for them to learn and pursue knowledge in policymaking simply because they have long years of practical experiences in developing, formulating, implementing, enforcing and subsequently analyzing and evaluating policies. This article reports case studies involving five national policy documents and internal policies at several key governmental department and organizations. The findings from the study enables the researchers to make a comparison between the theory of policy making and the practice of policy making in Malaysia. The findings show that there is still a huge gap between theory and practice in policymaking and policy studies in Malaysia. There are instances where few policy makers or top management personnel choose not to follow or ignorant about the steps of policy cycles. Although policy studies might have a very bright future in Malaysia but the journey in educating relevant parties would be a long one beginning with a correct perception and willingness to change attitudes.     Keywords; policy studies, policy cycle, policy making process\",\"PeriodicalId\":31881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2019.157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STIPM STI Policy and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2019.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策制定是政策研究的重要组成部分。从理论上讲,制定政策文件的过程既不容易也不简单。制定政策文件的过程绝不仅仅是照搬其他国家的政策规定,而是必须经过特定的步骤和程序,通常称为政策周期,每个周期都有特定的功能。虽然我们非常鼓励进行实验研究,但决策者最好还是根据已证实的理论、模型、方法和过程来调整政策制定工作。没有多少人知道所有这些过程和步骤。一些非常资深和经验丰富的政策制定者甚至认为,他们在制定、制定、实施、执行以及随后的分析和评估政策方面拥有多年的实践经验,因此不需要学习和追求政策制定方面的知识。本文报告了涉及五项国家政策文件和几个关键政府部门和组织的内部政策的案例研究。这项研究的发现使研究人员能够对马来西亚的政策制定理论和政策制定实践进行比较。研究结果表明,马来西亚在政策制定和政策研究方面仍存在巨大的理论与实践差距。很少有决策者或高层管理人员选择不遵循或不了解政策周期的步骤。虽然政策研究在马来西亚可能有一个非常光明的未来,但教育有关各方的旅程将是一个漫长的过程,首先要有正确的认识和改变态度的意愿。关键字;政策研究,政策周期,政策制定过程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theoretical And Practical Gaps In Policy Making Process In Five Organizations
Policy making is an integral part of policy studies. Theoretically the process of developing a policy document is neither easy nor simple. Far from merely copying the policy provisions of other countries, the process of developing a policy document must go through specific steps and procedures commonly known as policy cycle with each cycle serves specific functions. Although bench-making study is highly encouraged, it is also preferable for policymakers to align the policy making exercise in accordance to proven theory, model, method and process. Not many know about all these processes and steps. Some very senior and seasoned policymakers even think that there is no need for them to learn and pursue knowledge in policymaking simply because they have long years of practical experiences in developing, formulating, implementing, enforcing and subsequently analyzing and evaluating policies. This article reports case studies involving five national policy documents and internal policies at several key governmental department and organizations. The findings from the study enables the researchers to make a comparison between the theory of policy making and the practice of policy making in Malaysia. The findings show that there is still a huge gap between theory and practice in policymaking and policy studies in Malaysia. There are instances where few policy makers or top management personnel choose not to follow or ignorant about the steps of policy cycles. Although policy studies might have a very bright future in Malaysia but the journey in educating relevant parties would be a long one beginning with a correct perception and willingness to change attitudes.     Keywords; policy studies, policy cycle, policy making process
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors, Routes, and Existing Theories of Technology Commercialization in University: A Conceptual Framework Technological Learning and Technology Mastery by 10 Companies Under the Supervision of Agency for the Management of Strategic Industries (BPIS) in Indonesia Prior to the 1998 Economic Crisis Distinctive Competencies and Process of Innovation During Organizationals Merger : The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Vacuum Role of Universities in Promoting Innovation Policy in Southeast Asian Countries Innovation as A Socio-Technical Transition: The Case of Digital Transportation Service Platforms in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1