{"title":"对金字语法的谴责和讽刺。一、对话与论文,16世纪晚期","authors":"José Enrique López Martínez","doi":"10.3989/rfe.2020.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I analyze the progressive development of a number of ideas in Spanish language texts, from the middle of the XVIth Century on, that consolidated in Spain a deeply negative notion of the grammarian as it had been defended by the firsts humanists: as a specialist capable of doing high-level contributions in fields such as Law, Medicine or interpretation of the Scriptures. Since Huarte de San Juan’s Examen de ingenios or Pineda’s Dialogos familiares, until the texts written by Quevedo and Suarez de Figueroa at the beginning of the XVIIth Century, many Spanish intellectuals insisted on the grammarians’ alleged pedantry, ignorance, lack of moral authority or even heresy, in order to discredit every possible intent to applying the science of language to the other disciplines considered more serious or important.","PeriodicalId":44540,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA","volume":"9 1","pages":"107-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reprobación y sátira del gramático en las letras áureas. I. Diálogos y tratados, fines del siglo XVI\",\"authors\":\"José Enrique López Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/rfe.2020.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I analyze the progressive development of a number of ideas in Spanish language texts, from the middle of the XVIth Century on, that consolidated in Spain a deeply negative notion of the grammarian as it had been defended by the firsts humanists: as a specialist capable of doing high-level contributions in fields such as Law, Medicine or interpretation of the Scriptures. Since Huarte de San Juan’s Examen de ingenios or Pineda’s Dialogos familiares, until the texts written by Quevedo and Suarez de Figueroa at the beginning of the XVIIth Century, many Spanish intellectuals insisted on the grammarians’ alleged pedantry, ignorance, lack of moral authority or even heresy, in order to discredit every possible intent to applying the science of language to the other disciplines considered more serious or important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"107-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2020.005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2020.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在这篇文章中,我分析了西班牙语文本中一些思想的进步发展,从十六世纪中叶开始,这些思想在西班牙巩固了对语法学家的深刻负面观念,因为它曾被第一批人文主义者所捍卫:作为一名能够在法律、医学或圣经解释等领域做出高水平贡献的专家。从Huarte de San Juan的Examen de ingenios或Pineda的Dialogos families开始,直到Quevedo和Suarez de Figueroa在17世纪初所写的文本,许多西班牙知识分子坚持认为语法学家是所谓的迂腐,无知,缺乏道德权威甚至异端,以诋毁将语言科学应用于其他被认为更严肃或更重要的学科的任何可能的意图。
Reprobación y sátira del gramático en las letras áureas. I. Diálogos y tratados, fines del siglo XVI
In this article I analyze the progressive development of a number of ideas in Spanish language texts, from the middle of the XVIth Century on, that consolidated in Spain a deeply negative notion of the grammarian as it had been defended by the firsts humanists: as a specialist capable of doing high-level contributions in fields such as Law, Medicine or interpretation of the Scriptures. Since Huarte de San Juan’s Examen de ingenios or Pineda’s Dialogos familiares, until the texts written by Quevedo and Suarez de Figueroa at the beginning of the XVIIth Century, many Spanish intellectuals insisted on the grammarians’ alleged pedantry, ignorance, lack of moral authority or even heresy, in order to discredit every possible intent to applying the science of language to the other disciplines considered more serious or important.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1914 by Ramón Menéndez Pidal, Revista de Filología Española is edited in two half-yearly issues that compound one volume with around 450 pages, holding research papers on Spanish Philology. Along its trajectory RFE reflects the changes experimented by Philology itself. RFE also provides bibliographical information from Journals on the same subjects and received in the Library of Philology (CSIC). Assistant Editors, according to the evaluation performed by external revieweres, decide about aceptation and publishing. Submissions must be original, unpublished works. The language of the Journal is Spanish. Articles in other Romance languages may be published if aproved by the Assistant Editors.