Ana Oliveira, S. Flora, Liliana Santos, N. Morais, J. Ribeiro, F. Silva, Cândida G. Silva, B. Carreira, Ruben Caceiro, Dinesh Kumar, A. Marques, D. Brooks, C. Burtin, J. Cruz
{"title":"COPD患者在日常生活中使用移动应用程序的特点","authors":"Ana Oliveira, S. Flora, Liliana Santos, N. Morais, J. Ribeiro, F. Silva, Cândida G. Silva, B. Carreira, Ruben Caceiro, Dinesh Kumar, A. Marques, D. Brooks, C. Burtin, J. Cruz","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.4109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing evidence for the use of mobile health technology to support change in physical activity (PA) behaviour. However, studies in COPD have yielded mixed results, possibly because the contextual factors that characterise the use of mobile technology in COPD are not well understood. This study compared intrapersonal characteristics of patients with COPD who use mobile applications (apps) with those who do not. Patients with COPD were eligible if they used smartphones. They were surveyed about their use of mobile apps (any app beyond calls/texts apps), and specifically, apps for PA promotion and for COPD management, performed a 4.5m gait speed test and used an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) for 7 days. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and T-tests were used to compare sociodemographic (age, sex, marital status, education, occupation), health-related (FEV1pp, gait speed, CAT, mMRC, 6MWT) and PA (step count; time in sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous PA) characteristics between patients using and not using mobile apps. A total of 54 participants were enrolled (72% male; 67±8yrs; FEV1 48±18pp). 31/54 (57%) used mobile apps; from these, 15 (48%) used apps for PA promotion, 4 (13%) used apps for COPD management and 4 (13%) used both. Participants using mobile apps walked at a higher speed (Median [M] 1.49 [1.33-1.72] vs. M 1.31 [0.98-1.54]m/s; p=0.021) and spent more time in vigorous PA (M 0.49 [0.14-1.45] vs. M 0.12 [0.07-0.84]min/day; p=0.025) than those not using apps. No other differences were found. Patients with COPD using apps presented higher functionality and PA behaviours than those not using them. Future studies should investigate possible explanations for these findings to inform future mHealth apps.","PeriodicalId":94171,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of patients with COPD using mobile apps in daily life\",\"authors\":\"Ana Oliveira, S. Flora, Liliana Santos, N. Morais, J. Ribeiro, F. Silva, Cândida G. Silva, B. Carreira, Ruben Caceiro, Dinesh Kumar, A. Marques, D. Brooks, C. Burtin, J. Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.4109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is growing evidence for the use of mobile health technology to support change in physical activity (PA) behaviour. However, studies in COPD have yielded mixed results, possibly because the contextual factors that characterise the use of mobile technology in COPD are not well understood. This study compared intrapersonal characteristics of patients with COPD who use mobile applications (apps) with those who do not. Patients with COPD were eligible if they used smartphones. They were surveyed about their use of mobile apps (any app beyond calls/texts apps), and specifically, apps for PA promotion and for COPD management, performed a 4.5m gait speed test and used an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) for 7 days. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and T-tests were used to compare sociodemographic (age, sex, marital status, education, occupation), health-related (FEV1pp, gait speed, CAT, mMRC, 6MWT) and PA (step count; time in sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous PA) characteristics between patients using and not using mobile apps. A total of 54 participants were enrolled (72% male; 67±8yrs; FEV1 48±18pp). 31/54 (57%) used mobile apps; from these, 15 (48%) used apps for PA promotion, 4 (13%) used apps for COPD management and 4 (13%) used both. Participants using mobile apps walked at a higher speed (Median [M] 1.49 [1.33-1.72] vs. M 1.31 [0.98-1.54]m/s; p=0.021) and spent more time in vigorous PA (M 0.49 [0.14-1.45] vs. M 0.12 [0.07-0.84]min/day; p=0.025) than those not using apps. No other differences were found. Patients with COPD using apps presented higher functionality and PA behaviours than those not using them. Future studies should investigate possible explanations for these findings to inform future mHealth apps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.4109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2020.4109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的证据表明,利用移动卫生技术支持改变身体活动行为。然而,对COPD的研究产生了不同的结果,可能是因为在COPD中使用移动技术的背景因素尚未得到很好的理解。这项研究比较了使用移动应用程序和不使用移动应用程序的COPD患者的个人特征。COPD患者如果使用智能手机,则符合条件。调查了他们使用移动应用程序的情况(除了电话/短信应用程序之外的任何应用程序),特别是用于PA推广和COPD管理的应用程序,进行了4.5米的步态速度测试,并使用加速度计(ActiGraph GT3X+) 7天。采用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和t检验比较社会人口学(年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度、职业)、健康相关(FEV1pp、步速、CAT、mMRC、6MWT)和PA(步数;使用和不使用移动应用程序的患者的久坐时间、轻度、中度和剧烈PA)特征。共纳入54名受试者(72%为男性;67±8年;残48±18页)。31/54(57%)使用移动应用程序;其中,15人(48%)使用应用程序进行PA推广,4人(13%)使用应用程序进行COPD管理,4人(13%)两者都使用。使用移动应用程序的参与者以更高的速度行走(中位数[M] 1.49 [1.33-1.72] vs. M 1.31 [0.98-1.54] M /s;p=0.021),且剧烈运动的时间更长(m0.49 [0.14-1.45] vs. m0.12 [0.07-0.84]min/d;P =0.025)。没有发现其他差异。使用应用程序的COPD患者比不使用应用程序的患者表现出更高的功能和PA行为。未来的研究应该调查这些发现的可能解释,为未来的移动健康应用提供信息。
Characteristics of patients with COPD using mobile apps in daily life
There is growing evidence for the use of mobile health technology to support change in physical activity (PA) behaviour. However, studies in COPD have yielded mixed results, possibly because the contextual factors that characterise the use of mobile technology in COPD are not well understood. This study compared intrapersonal characteristics of patients with COPD who use mobile applications (apps) with those who do not. Patients with COPD were eligible if they used smartphones. They were surveyed about their use of mobile apps (any app beyond calls/texts apps), and specifically, apps for PA promotion and for COPD management, performed a 4.5m gait speed test and used an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) for 7 days. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and T-tests were used to compare sociodemographic (age, sex, marital status, education, occupation), health-related (FEV1pp, gait speed, CAT, mMRC, 6MWT) and PA (step count; time in sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous PA) characteristics between patients using and not using mobile apps. A total of 54 participants were enrolled (72% male; 67±8yrs; FEV1 48±18pp). 31/54 (57%) used mobile apps; from these, 15 (48%) used apps for PA promotion, 4 (13%) used apps for COPD management and 4 (13%) used both. Participants using mobile apps walked at a higher speed (Median [M] 1.49 [1.33-1.72] vs. M 1.31 [0.98-1.54]m/s; p=0.021) and spent more time in vigorous PA (M 0.49 [0.14-1.45] vs. M 0.12 [0.07-0.84]min/day; p=0.025) than those not using apps. No other differences were found. Patients with COPD using apps presented higher functionality and PA behaviours than those not using them. Future studies should investigate possible explanations for these findings to inform future mHealth apps.