{"title":"罗德在牛津必须沦陷:一个关键的证词","authors":"Simukai Chigudu","doi":"10.1080/21681392.2020.1788401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rhodes Must Fall (RMF) announced its presence in the University of Oxford through rigorous calls to tackle ‘the plague of colonial iconography (in the form of statues, plaques and paintings) that seeks to whitewash and distort history’ throughout the university and beyond. In addition, RMF aimed to reform the Eurocentric curricula that dominate the university’s pedagogy across diverse fields of study and to address the under-representation and inadequate welfare provision for black and minority ethnic staff and students at Oxford. The first of these major aims soon concentrated on the removal of a statue of the British colonialist, Cecil John Rhodes, and set the stage for a national controversy as public debates erupted in Britain about the complex relationships between history, racial injustice and the role of elite universities in the modern world. In this article, I revisit some of these debates from the vantage point of my own involvement in RMF. By delineating the origins and trajectory of RMF in Oxford and critically analysing the admiration and admonition the movement evinced, I show how a particularly potent British national imaginary has memorialized the country’s imperial past and is unable to deal with racism in the present.","PeriodicalId":37966,"journal":{"name":"Critical African Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"302 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford: a critical testimony\",\"authors\":\"Simukai Chigudu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681392.2020.1788401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rhodes Must Fall (RMF) announced its presence in the University of Oxford through rigorous calls to tackle ‘the plague of colonial iconography (in the form of statues, plaques and paintings) that seeks to whitewash and distort history’ throughout the university and beyond. In addition, RMF aimed to reform the Eurocentric curricula that dominate the university’s pedagogy across diverse fields of study and to address the under-representation and inadequate welfare provision for black and minority ethnic staff and students at Oxford. The first of these major aims soon concentrated on the removal of a statue of the British colonialist, Cecil John Rhodes, and set the stage for a national controversy as public debates erupted in Britain about the complex relationships between history, racial injustice and the role of elite universities in the modern world. In this article, I revisit some of these debates from the vantage point of my own involvement in RMF. By delineating the origins and trajectory of RMF in Oxford and critically analysing the admiration and admonition the movement evinced, I show how a particularly potent British national imaginary has memorialized the country’s imperial past and is unable to deal with racism in the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical African Studies\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"302 - 312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2020.1788401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2020.1788401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
Rhodes Must Fall (RMF)通过严格的呼吁来解决牛津大学内外“试图粉饰和扭曲历史的殖民图像(以雕像、牌匾和绘画的形式)的瘟疫”,宣布其在牛津大学的存在。此外,RMF的目标是改革以欧洲为中心的课程,这些课程在牛津大学各个研究领域的教学中占主导地位,并解决牛津大学黑人和少数民族教职员工和学生的代表性不足和福利供应不足的问题。这些主要目标中的第一个很快集中在拆除英国殖民主义者塞西尔·约翰·罗兹(Cecil John Rhodes)的雕像上,并为一场全国性的争议奠定了基础,英国爆发了关于历史、种族不公正和精英大学在现代世界中的作用之间复杂关系的公开辩论。在本文中,我将从我自己参与RMF的有利位置重新审视其中的一些争论。通过描绘牛津大学RMF的起源和轨迹,并批判性地分析该运动所表现出的钦佩和告诫,我展示了一个特别强大的英国民族想象是如何纪念这个国家的帝国历史,而无法处理当前的种族主义问题的。
Rhodes Must Fall (RMF) announced its presence in the University of Oxford through rigorous calls to tackle ‘the plague of colonial iconography (in the form of statues, plaques and paintings) that seeks to whitewash and distort history’ throughout the university and beyond. In addition, RMF aimed to reform the Eurocentric curricula that dominate the university’s pedagogy across diverse fields of study and to address the under-representation and inadequate welfare provision for black and minority ethnic staff and students at Oxford. The first of these major aims soon concentrated on the removal of a statue of the British colonialist, Cecil John Rhodes, and set the stage for a national controversy as public debates erupted in Britain about the complex relationships between history, racial injustice and the role of elite universities in the modern world. In this article, I revisit some of these debates from the vantage point of my own involvement in RMF. By delineating the origins and trajectory of RMF in Oxford and critically analysing the admiration and admonition the movement evinced, I show how a particularly potent British national imaginary has memorialized the country’s imperial past and is unable to deal with racism in the present.
期刊介绍:
Critical African Studies seeks to return Africanist scholarship to the heart of theoretical innovation within each of its constituent disciplines, including Anthropology, Political Science, Sociology, History, Law and Economics. We offer authors a more flexible publishing platform than other journals, allowing them greater space to develop empirical discussions alongside theoretical and conceptual engagements. We aim to publish scholarly articles that offer both innovative empirical contributions, grounded in original fieldwork, and also innovative theoretical engagements. This speaks to our broader intention to promote the deployment of thorough empirical work for the purposes of sophisticated theoretical innovation. We invite contributions that meet the aims of the journal, including special issue proposals that offer fresh empirical and theoretical insights into African Studies debates.