西班牙大学图书馆的自愿透明度

IF 0.2 Q2 Arts and Humanities JLIS.it Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.36253/jlis.it-457
Ana R. Pacios, Margarita Pérez Pulido, Marina Vianello
{"title":"西班牙大学图书馆的自愿透明度","authors":"Ana R. Pacios, Margarita Pérez Pulido, Marina Vianello","doi":"10.36253/jlis.it-457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research reported here aimed to ascertain the degree of transparency exhibited by Spanish public university libraries based on their active public disclosure practice. Transparency was measured by applying the TransPa_BA tool to the transparency-related information published by the country’s 50 public university libraries on their websites. The tool addresses 21 indicators grouped under eight areas, used in this study to measure university libraries’ public disclosure performance. The data collected were scored pursuant to the provisions of Spanish Act 19/2013 of 9 December on Transparency, Access to Public Information and Good Governance as adapted to university libraries, as well as in terms of other factors scantly developed in or omitted from the Act. The indicators and their respective parameters (content, form, accessibility, reusability, dating and updating or validity) constitute guidelines enabling libraries to enhance transparency and accountability by reporting their activities and practice in key areas to society in general and their stakeholders in particular. The objective is to help such institutions operate more transparently, for the information afforded by the indicators is deemed relevant to their activity while also monitoring their performance. The findings show that university libraries, which have become more transparent over time, are more transparent than other information units (national public libraries and historic and university archives). Some were nonetheless found to have room for improvement. On the grounds of their scores, these libraries can be classified under three headings: transparent, translucent or opaque. The parameters where good practices were most frequently identified included service usage rules and regulations, user charters and the annual report.","PeriodicalId":42905,"journal":{"name":"JLIS.it","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary Transparency in Spanish University Libraries\",\"authors\":\"Ana R. Pacios, Margarita Pérez Pulido, Marina Vianello\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/jlis.it-457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research reported here aimed to ascertain the degree of transparency exhibited by Spanish public university libraries based on their active public disclosure practice. Transparency was measured by applying the TransPa_BA tool to the transparency-related information published by the country’s 50 public university libraries on their websites. The tool addresses 21 indicators grouped under eight areas, used in this study to measure university libraries’ public disclosure performance. The data collected were scored pursuant to the provisions of Spanish Act 19/2013 of 9 December on Transparency, Access to Public Information and Good Governance as adapted to university libraries, as well as in terms of other factors scantly developed in or omitted from the Act. The indicators and their respective parameters (content, form, accessibility, reusability, dating and updating or validity) constitute guidelines enabling libraries to enhance transparency and accountability by reporting their activities and practice in key areas to society in general and their stakeholders in particular. The objective is to help such institutions operate more transparently, for the information afforded by the indicators is deemed relevant to their activity while also monitoring their performance. The findings show that university libraries, which have become more transparent over time, are more transparent than other information units (national public libraries and historic and university archives). Some were nonetheless found to have room for improvement. On the grounds of their scores, these libraries can be classified under three headings: transparent, translucent or opaque. The parameters where good practices were most frequently identified included service usage rules and regulations, user charters and the annual report.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JLIS.it\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JLIS.it\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JLIS.it","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文报告的研究旨在确定西班牙公立大学图书馆在积极公开披露实践的基础上所表现出的透明度程度。透明度是通过将TransPa_BA工具应用于该国50所公立大学图书馆在其网站上发布的与透明度相关的信息来衡量的。该工具涉及8个领域的21个指标,在本研究中用于衡量大学图书馆的公开披露绩效。根据西班牙2013年12月9日颁布的《关于透明度、公共信息获取和良好治理的第19/2013号法案》的规定,以及该法案中很少提及或省略的其他因素,对所收集的数据进行了评分。这些指标及其各自的参数(内容、形式、可访问性、可重用性、日期和更新或有效性)构成了指导方针,使图书馆能够通过向社会特别是利益相关者报告其在关键领域的活动和实践来提高透明度和问责制。目标是帮助这些机构更透明地运作,因为指标所提供的资料被认为与它们的活动有关,同时也监测它们的业绩。调查结果表明,随着时间的推移,大学图书馆变得更加透明,比其他信息单位(国家公共图书馆和历史和大学档案馆)更加透明。尽管如此,其中一些仍有改进的余地。根据他们的分数,这些图书馆可以分为三个标题:透明,半透明或不透明。最常确定良好做法的参数包括服务使用规则和条例、用户章程和年度报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Voluntary Transparency in Spanish University Libraries
The research reported here aimed to ascertain the degree of transparency exhibited by Spanish public university libraries based on their active public disclosure practice. Transparency was measured by applying the TransPa_BA tool to the transparency-related information published by the country’s 50 public university libraries on their websites. The tool addresses 21 indicators grouped under eight areas, used in this study to measure university libraries’ public disclosure performance. The data collected were scored pursuant to the provisions of Spanish Act 19/2013 of 9 December on Transparency, Access to Public Information and Good Governance as adapted to university libraries, as well as in terms of other factors scantly developed in or omitted from the Act. The indicators and their respective parameters (content, form, accessibility, reusability, dating and updating or validity) constitute guidelines enabling libraries to enhance transparency and accountability by reporting their activities and practice in key areas to society in general and their stakeholders in particular. The objective is to help such institutions operate more transparently, for the information afforded by the indicators is deemed relevant to their activity while also monitoring their performance. The findings show that university libraries, which have become more transparent over time, are more transparent than other information units (national public libraries and historic and university archives). Some were nonetheless found to have room for improvement. On the grounds of their scores, these libraries can be classified under three headings: transparent, translucent or opaque. The parameters where good practices were most frequently identified included service usage rules and regulations, user charters and the annual report.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JLIS.it
JLIS.it INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JLIS.it is an academic journal of international scope, peer-reviewed and open access, aiming to valorise international research in Library and Information Science. Contributions in LIS, Library and Information Science, are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Librarianship as Civic Engagement Hachette v. Internet Archive On the edge of knowledge Alberto Petrucciani. Un amico, un collega, un Maestro Document as a multifaceted knowledge object
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1