非常规油气泄漏压力预测的系统方法——以准噶尔盆地为例

Zhibin Jiang, L. Sima, Wei Zhou, Xiaoguang Wang, Hanbing Xu, Kun Ding, Lisha Qi, Sheng Zheng, D. Xie, Liming Lian, Chuanchuan Qian, Jiezhong Wang, Zhiwen Bai
{"title":"非常规油气泄漏压力预测的系统方法——以准噶尔盆地为例","authors":"Zhibin Jiang, L. Sima, Wei Zhou, Xiaoguang Wang, Hanbing Xu, Kun Ding, Lisha Qi, Sheng Zheng, D. Xie, Liming Lian, Chuanchuan Qian, Jiezhong Wang, Zhiwen Bai","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22065-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mud loss is one of the most severe incidents encountered while drilling. As the focus of exploration has moved to the deeper and more complicated formations, mud loss happens more frequently, causing safety incidents and lowering the drilling efficiency. The lost mud invades into formations, makes harm to the reservoir and affects the accuracy of formation evaluation. Large numbers of studies have proved that the key strategy to deal with mud loss is to prevent it and follow with remedial action. The prerequisite of such measurements is locating the formation of mud loss. Loss pressure is the highest pressure that formation can hold before mud loss happens. It is important for deciding mud weight and critical for fractured formations. Therefore, an innovative ring-cracking loss model is created by integrating minimum horizontal principal stress loss model, statistical loss model, and critical crack width loss model after analyzing the loss mechanism of fractured formation. These four models are applied to the fractured formation of block X, and the results are compared to the actual downhole pressure.The result from ring-cracking-based loss model is less than the actual downhole pressure. This model is suitable for field application and can guide the design of mud density.","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Approach to Leak-Off Pressure Prediction in Unconventional Resources –A Case Study from Junggar Basin, China\",\"authors\":\"Zhibin Jiang, L. Sima, Wei Zhou, Xiaoguang Wang, Hanbing Xu, Kun Ding, Lisha Qi, Sheng Zheng, D. Xie, Liming Lian, Chuanchuan Qian, Jiezhong Wang, Zhiwen Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22065-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mud loss is one of the most severe incidents encountered while drilling. As the focus of exploration has moved to the deeper and more complicated formations, mud loss happens more frequently, causing safety incidents and lowering the drilling efficiency. The lost mud invades into formations, makes harm to the reservoir and affects the accuracy of formation evaluation. Large numbers of studies have proved that the key strategy to deal with mud loss is to prevent it and follow with remedial action. The prerequisite of such measurements is locating the formation of mud loss. Loss pressure is the highest pressure that formation can hold before mud loss happens. It is important for deciding mud weight and critical for fractured formations. Therefore, an innovative ring-cracking loss model is created by integrating minimum horizontal principal stress loss model, statistical loss model, and critical crack width loss model after analyzing the loss mechanism of fractured formation. These four models are applied to the fractured formation of block X, and the results are compared to the actual downhole pressure.The result from ring-cracking-based loss model is less than the actual downhole pressure. This model is suitable for field application and can guide the design of mud density.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22065-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22065-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

泥浆漏失是钻井过程中最严重的事故之一。随着勘探的重点向更深、更复杂的地层转移,泥浆漏失的发生频率越来越高,造成了安全事故,降低了钻井效率。漏失泥浆侵入地层,对储层造成危害,影响地层评价的准确性。大量研究证明,处理泥浆漏失的关键策略是预防并采取补救措施。这种测量的前提是确定泥浆损失的形成位置。漏失压力是泥浆发生漏失前地层所能承受的最高压力。这对于确定泥浆比重非常重要,对于裂缝性地层至关重要。因此,在分析裂缝性地层损失机理的基础上,综合最小水平主应力损失模型、统计损失模型和临界裂缝宽度损失模型,建立了创新性的环裂损失模型。将这4种模型应用于X区块裂缝性地层,并与实际井下压力进行了比较。基于环裂的损失模型计算结果小于实际井下压力。该模型适合于现场应用,可以指导泥浆密度的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systematic Approach to Leak-Off Pressure Prediction in Unconventional Resources –A Case Study from Junggar Basin, China
Mud loss is one of the most severe incidents encountered while drilling. As the focus of exploration has moved to the deeper and more complicated formations, mud loss happens more frequently, causing safety incidents and lowering the drilling efficiency. The lost mud invades into formations, makes harm to the reservoir and affects the accuracy of formation evaluation. Large numbers of studies have proved that the key strategy to deal with mud loss is to prevent it and follow with remedial action. The prerequisite of such measurements is locating the formation of mud loss. Loss pressure is the highest pressure that formation can hold before mud loss happens. It is important for deciding mud weight and critical for fractured formations. Therefore, an innovative ring-cracking loss model is created by integrating minimum horizontal principal stress loss model, statistical loss model, and critical crack width loss model after analyzing the loss mechanism of fractured formation. These four models are applied to the fractured formation of block X, and the results are compared to the actual downhole pressure.The result from ring-cracking-based loss model is less than the actual downhole pressure. This model is suitable for field application and can guide the design of mud density.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Data Driven Method to Predict and Restore Missing Well Head Flow Pressure Downhole Camera Run Validates Limited Entry Fracturing Technique and Improves Pay Coverage in Deep Tight Laminated Gas Reservoir of Western India An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Oil/Gas Composition on the Performance of Carbonated Water Injection CWI SmartPoint Seismic Data Acquisition System Reservoir Characterization for Isolated Porosity from Multi-Frequency Dielectric Measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1