社区成瘾神经心理学专科服务中认知功能的预测因素。

IF 5.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1017/BrImp.2021.38
James R Gooden, Catherine A Cox, Vanessa Petersen, Ashlee Curtis, Paul G Sanfilippo, Victoria Manning, Georgia L Bolt, Dan I Lubman
{"title":"社区成瘾神经心理学专科服务中认知功能的预测因素。","authors":"James R Gooden, Catherine A Cox, Vanessa Petersen, Ashlee Curtis, Paul G Sanfilippo, Victoria Manning, Georgia L Bolt, Dan I Lubman","doi":"10.1017/BrImp.2021.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive impairment is common in individuals presenting to alcohol and other drug (AOD) settings and the presence of biopsychosocial complexity and health inequities can complicate the experience of symptoms and access to treatment services. A challenge for neuropsychologists in these settings is to evaluate the likely individual contribution of these factors to cognition when providing an opinion regarding diagnoses such as acquired brain injury (ABI). This study therefore aimed to identify predictors of cognitive functioning in AOD clients attending for neuropsychological assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 200 clients with AOD histories who attended for assessment between 2014 and 2018 were analysed and a series of multiple regressions were conducted to explore predictors of cognitive impairment including demographic, diagnostic, substance use, medication, and mental health variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression modelling identified age, gender, years of education, age of first use, days of abstinence, sedative load, emotional distress and diagnoses of ABI and developmental disorders as contributing to aspects of neuropsychological functioning. Significant models were obtained for verbal intellectual functioning (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.19), nonverbal intellectual functioning (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.10), information processing speed (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.20), working memory (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.05), verbal recall (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.08), visual recall (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.22), divided attention (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.14), and cognitive inhibition (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of careful provision of diagnoses in clients with AOD histories who have high levels of unmet clinical needs. They demonstrate the interaction of premorbid and potentially modifiable comorbid factors such as emotional distress and prescription medication on cognition. Ensuring that modifiable risk factors for cognitive impairment are managed may reduce experiences of cognitive impairment and improve diagnostic clarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48459,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"47 1","pages":"54-68"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of cognitive functioning in presentations to a community-based specialist addiction neuropsychology service.\",\"authors\":\"James R Gooden, Catherine A Cox, Vanessa Petersen, Ashlee Curtis, Paul G Sanfilippo, Victoria Manning, Georgia L Bolt, Dan I Lubman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/BrImp.2021.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive impairment is common in individuals presenting to alcohol and other drug (AOD) settings and the presence of biopsychosocial complexity and health inequities can complicate the experience of symptoms and access to treatment services. A challenge for neuropsychologists in these settings is to evaluate the likely individual contribution of these factors to cognition when providing an opinion regarding diagnoses such as acquired brain injury (ABI). This study therefore aimed to identify predictors of cognitive functioning in AOD clients attending for neuropsychological assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 200 clients with AOD histories who attended for assessment between 2014 and 2018 were analysed and a series of multiple regressions were conducted to explore predictors of cognitive impairment including demographic, diagnostic, substance use, medication, and mental health variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression modelling identified age, gender, years of education, age of first use, days of abstinence, sedative load, emotional distress and diagnoses of ABI and developmental disorders as contributing to aspects of neuropsychological functioning. Significant models were obtained for verbal intellectual functioning (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.19), nonverbal intellectual functioning (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.10), information processing speed (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.20), working memory (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.05), verbal recall (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.08), visual recall (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.22), divided attention (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.14), and cognitive inhibition (Adj R<sup>2</sup> = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of careful provision of diagnoses in clients with AOD histories who have high levels of unmet clinical needs. They demonstrate the interaction of premorbid and potentially modifiable comorbid factors such as emotional distress and prescription medication on cognition. Ensuring that modifiable risk factors for cognitive impairment are managed may reduce experiences of cognitive impairment and improve diagnostic clarity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"54-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2021.38\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2021.38","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:认知障碍在酒精和其他药物(AOD)环境中的患者中很常见,而生物心理社会复杂性和健康不平等的存在会使患者的症状体验和获得治疗服务变得更加复杂。在这些环境中,神经心理学家面临的一个挑战是,在对获得性脑损伤(ABI)等诊断提出意见时,如何评估这些因素对认知的可能个人贡献。因此,本研究旨在确定接受神经心理评估的 AOD 患者认知功能的预测因素:对2014年至2018年期间接受评估的200名有AOD病史的患者的临床数据进行了分析,并进行了一系列多元回归,以探索认知功能障碍的预测因素,包括人口统计学、诊断、药物使用、药物治疗和心理健康变量:回归建模发现,年龄、性别、受教育年限、首次使用药物的年龄、戒断天数、镇静剂负荷、情绪困扰以及ABI和发育障碍诊断是影响神经心理功能的因素。在言语智力功能(Adj R2 = 0.19)、非言语智力功能(Adj R2 = 0.10)、信息处理速度(Adj R2 = 0.20)、工作记忆(Adj R2 = 0.05)、言语回忆(Adj R2 = 0.08)、视觉记忆(Adj R2 = 0.22)、注意力分散(Adj R2 = 0.14)和认知抑制(Adj R2 = 0.07)方面,均建立了显著的模型:这些研究结果凸显了对有毒品史且临床需求未得到满足的患者进行仔细诊断的重要性。这些研究结果表明,病前和潜在的可改变合并症因素(如情绪困扰和处方药)会对认知产生相互作用。确保可改变的认知障碍风险因素得到控制,可减少认知障碍的经历并提高诊断的清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of cognitive functioning in presentations to a community-based specialist addiction neuropsychology service.

Introduction: Cognitive impairment is common in individuals presenting to alcohol and other drug (AOD) settings and the presence of biopsychosocial complexity and health inequities can complicate the experience of symptoms and access to treatment services. A challenge for neuropsychologists in these settings is to evaluate the likely individual contribution of these factors to cognition when providing an opinion regarding diagnoses such as acquired brain injury (ABI). This study therefore aimed to identify predictors of cognitive functioning in AOD clients attending for neuropsychological assessment.

Methods: Clinical data from 200 clients with AOD histories who attended for assessment between 2014 and 2018 were analysed and a series of multiple regressions were conducted to explore predictors of cognitive impairment including demographic, diagnostic, substance use, medication, and mental health variables.

Results: Regression modelling identified age, gender, years of education, age of first use, days of abstinence, sedative load, emotional distress and diagnoses of ABI and developmental disorders as contributing to aspects of neuropsychological functioning. Significant models were obtained for verbal intellectual functioning (Adj R2 = 0.19), nonverbal intellectual functioning (Adj R2 = 0.10), information processing speed (Adj R2 = 0.20), working memory (Adj R2 = 0.05), verbal recall (Adj R2 = 0.08), visual recall (Adj R2 = 0.22), divided attention (Adj R2 = 0.14), and cognitive inhibition (Adj R2 = 0.07).

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of careful provision of diagnoses in clients with AOD histories who have high levels of unmet clinical needs. They demonstrate the interaction of premorbid and potentially modifiable comorbid factors such as emotional distress and prescription medication on cognition. Ensuring that modifiable risk factors for cognitive impairment are managed may reduce experiences of cognitive impairment and improve diagnostic clarity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational Psychology
Journal of Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: The main purpose of the Journal of Educational Psychology® is to publish original, primary psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels. A secondary purpose of the Journal is the occasional publication of exceptionally important theoretical and review articles that are pertinent to educational psychology. Please note, the Journal does not typically publish reliability and validity studies of specific tests or assessment instruments.
期刊最新文献
Classroom learning climate profiles: Combining classroom goal structure and social climate to support student school functioning and behavioral adaptation. Reading for university or for myself? Effects of context and beliefs about science on college students’ document selection. The relation between prior knowledge and learning in regular and gifted classes: A multigroup latent growth curve analysis. Supplemental Material for Classroom Learning Climate Profiles: Combining Classroom Goal Structure and Social Climate to Support Student School Functioning and Behavioral Adaptation Supplemental Material for The Relation Between Prior Knowledge and Learning in Regular and Gifted Classes: A Multigroup Latent Growth Curve Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1