培育新的脂肪解放运动:与脂肪玫瑰一起培育运动生态

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI:10.1080/21604851.2021.1907110
Dawn M Haney, Max Airborne, Charis Stiles
{"title":"培育新的脂肪解放运动:与脂肪玫瑰一起培育运动生态","authors":"Dawn M Haney, Max Airborne, Charis Stiles","doi":"10.1080/21604851.2021.1907110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fat liberation, as distinct from other social movements, has been around since the 1970s. But the vision initiated in the 1973 Fat Liberation Manifesto feels narrowed today, limited to posting selfies online or boycotting diets. While fat acceptance is essential, it is only part of a fat liberation movement. Liberation movements intervene in institutional power that unfairly advantage one group over others. For fat people, what would a fat liberation movement look like? One that intervenes when insurance “declines coverage” for fat bodies until they lose weight? Or when police are exonerated for murdering Black people like Eric Garner, blaming him for being a “ticking time bomb of obesity” when police put him a chokehold? After a year and half of consistent action to engage fat people in more radical liberation that intervenes in institutional power, we officially launched Fat Rose as an online group for study and action in January 2019. In this article, we use two political organizing tools to assess fat activism: Movement Ecology (personal transformation, building alternatives, changing dominant institutions) and the Momentum Organizing Model (escalation, active popular support, absorption). These tools help us place fat liberation work in context of broader liberation movements, and strengthen our organizing for the liberation of fat people. In this article, we explore these tools through our work with Fat Rose, to share our story and to offer these tools as useful organizing strategies for other fat liberation work to come.","PeriodicalId":37967,"journal":{"name":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","volume":"54 1","pages":"312 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultivating new fat liberation movements: growing a movement ecology with Fat Rose\",\"authors\":\"Dawn M Haney, Max Airborne, Charis Stiles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21604851.2021.1907110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fat liberation, as distinct from other social movements, has been around since the 1970s. But the vision initiated in the 1973 Fat Liberation Manifesto feels narrowed today, limited to posting selfies online or boycotting diets. While fat acceptance is essential, it is only part of a fat liberation movement. Liberation movements intervene in institutional power that unfairly advantage one group over others. For fat people, what would a fat liberation movement look like? One that intervenes when insurance “declines coverage” for fat bodies until they lose weight? Or when police are exonerated for murdering Black people like Eric Garner, blaming him for being a “ticking time bomb of obesity” when police put him a chokehold? After a year and half of consistent action to engage fat people in more radical liberation that intervenes in institutional power, we officially launched Fat Rose as an online group for study and action in January 2019. In this article, we use two political organizing tools to assess fat activism: Movement Ecology (personal transformation, building alternatives, changing dominant institutions) and the Momentum Organizing Model (escalation, active popular support, absorption). These tools help us place fat liberation work in context of broader liberation movements, and strengthen our organizing for the liberation of fat people. In this article, we explore these tools through our work with Fat Rose, to share our story and to offer these tools as useful organizing strategies for other fat liberation work to come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"312 - 327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1907110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1907110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与其他社会运动不同,脂肪解放运动从20世纪70年代就开始了。但1973年的《脂肪解放宣言》(Fat Liberation Manifesto)所提出的愿景,如今却显得狭隘了,仅限于在网上晒自拍或抵制节食。虽然接受肥胖是必要的,但这只是肥胖解放运动的一部分。解放运动干预了不公平地使一个群体优于其他群体的体制权力。对于胖人来说,肥胖解放运动是什么样子的?当保险“拒绝覆盖”胖子直到他们减肥时进行干预?或者当警察因谋杀像埃里克·加纳这样的黑人而被免罪,当警察掐住他的脖子时指责他是“肥胖的定时炸弹”时?经过一年半的持续行动,让肥胖者参与更激进的解放,干预体制权力,我们于2019年1月正式推出了“胖玫瑰”这个在线学习和行动团体。在本文中,我们使用两种政治组织工具来评估肥胖行动主义:运动生态学(个人转型,建立替代方案,改变主导机构)和动量组织模型(升级,积极的民众支持,吸收)。这些工具帮助我们将脂肪解放工作置于更广泛的解放运动的背景下,并加强我们对肥胖人群解放的组织。在这篇文章中,我们通过与胖玫瑰的合作来探索这些工具,分享我们的故事,并将这些工具作为有用的组织策略提供给其他的脂肪解放工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultivating new fat liberation movements: growing a movement ecology with Fat Rose
ABSTRACT Fat liberation, as distinct from other social movements, has been around since the 1970s. But the vision initiated in the 1973 Fat Liberation Manifesto feels narrowed today, limited to posting selfies online or boycotting diets. While fat acceptance is essential, it is only part of a fat liberation movement. Liberation movements intervene in institutional power that unfairly advantage one group over others. For fat people, what would a fat liberation movement look like? One that intervenes when insurance “declines coverage” for fat bodies until they lose weight? Or when police are exonerated for murdering Black people like Eric Garner, blaming him for being a “ticking time bomb of obesity” when police put him a chokehold? After a year and half of consistent action to engage fat people in more radical liberation that intervenes in institutional power, we officially launched Fat Rose as an online group for study and action in January 2019. In this article, we use two political organizing tools to assess fat activism: Movement Ecology (personal transformation, building alternatives, changing dominant institutions) and the Momentum Organizing Model (escalation, active popular support, absorption). These tools help us place fat liberation work in context of broader liberation movements, and strengthen our organizing for the liberation of fat people. In this article, we explore these tools through our work with Fat Rose, to share our story and to offer these tools as useful organizing strategies for other fat liberation work to come.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
“My heart’s fine as long as my stomach’s not empty”: patriarchal horror, women’s excess, and fat liberation in Criminally Insane War on fat in postwar Finland: A history of fat-shaming (Re)presenting The Big Grrrls Fat talk: parenting in the age of diet culture The Contemporary Reader of Gender and Fat Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1