{"title":"专题研究及其在立陶宛社会学中的地位","authors":"Lilija Kublickienė, A. Žvinklienė","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article defines the concept of the monographic method and presents the development of the emergence and evolution of monographic research. The contribution of such key representatives of these studies as Frédéric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti and Franciszek Bujak to the science of sociology is reviewed. Attention is also paid to the place of monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, stating that Lithuania has its own history of monographic research, but this research does not fall within the focus of sociologists’ analysis. The article argues the importance of academic discussions in order to legitimise monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, which would create opportunities to expand the scope of works to be included in the history of sociology and look at Lithuanian rural research in the context of a common European tradition.","PeriodicalId":43648,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija-Sociologija","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monographic Research and its Place in Lithuanian Sociology\",\"authors\":\"Lilija Kublickienė, A. Žvinklienė\",\"doi\":\"10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article defines the concept of the monographic method and presents the development of the emergence and evolution of monographic research. The contribution of such key representatives of these studies as Frédéric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti and Franciszek Bujak to the science of sociology is reviewed. Attention is also paid to the place of monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, stating that Lithuania has its own history of monographic research, but this research does not fall within the focus of sociologists’ analysis. The article argues the importance of academic discussions in order to legitimise monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, which would create opportunities to expand the scope of works to be included in the history of sociology and look at Lithuanian rural research in the context of a common European tradition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofija-Sociologija\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofija-Sociologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija-Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v33i2.4718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对专题研究方法的概念进行了界定,并介绍了专题研究的产生和演变过程。本文回顾了这些研究的主要代表,如fracimdsamric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti和Franciszek Bujak对社会学的贡献。文章还关注了专题研究在立陶宛社会学中的地位,指出立陶宛有自己的专题研究历史,但这一研究并不属于社会学家分析的重点。这篇文章认为学术讨论的重要性是为了使立陶宛社会学的专题研究合法化,这将创造机会扩大作品的范围,纳入社会学历史,并在欧洲共同传统的背景下审视立陶宛农村研究。
Monographic Research and its Place in Lithuanian Sociology
The article defines the concept of the monographic method and presents the development of the emergence and evolution of monographic research. The contribution of such key representatives of these studies as Frédéric Le Play, Dimitrie Gusti and Franciszek Bujak to the science of sociology is reviewed. Attention is also paid to the place of monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, stating that Lithuania has its own history of monographic research, but this research does not fall within the focus of sociologists’ analysis. The article argues the importance of academic discussions in order to legitimise monographic research in Lithuanian sociology, which would create opportunities to expand the scope of works to be included in the history of sociology and look at Lithuanian rural research in the context of a common European tradition.