抒情的骗子,动物的欲望和比喻的亲属关系:罗伯特·亨利森在《道德法比利斯》的序言中为诗歌辩护

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Innes Review Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.3366/INR.2021.0280
Davis Moses
{"title":"抒情的骗子,动物的欲望和比喻的亲属关系:罗伯特·亨利森在《道德法比利斯》的序言中为诗歌辩护","authors":"Davis Moses","doi":"10.3366/INR.2021.0280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article cites Robert Henryson's Fables in order to contextualise the history of the medieval notion that the world of imaginary, poetic fiction, needs justification; and examines the theological sources which served as the foundation of that debate and provided the validation for the use of fable animals as moral exemplars.","PeriodicalId":42054,"journal":{"name":"Innes Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lyrical liars, animal desires and figurative kinship: Robert Henryson's defence of poetry in the prologue to The Morall Fabillis\",\"authors\":\"Davis Moses\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/INR.2021.0280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article cites Robert Henryson's Fables in order to contextualise the history of the medieval notion that the world of imaginary, poetic fiction, needs justification; and examines the theological sources which served as the foundation of that debate and provided the validation for the use of fable animals as moral exemplars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innes Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innes Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/INR.2021.0280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innes Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/INR.2021.0280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文引用了罗伯特·亨利森的《寓言》,以便将中世纪的观念置于语境中,即想象的世界,诗意的小说,需要证明;并考察了作为这场辩论基础的神学来源,并为使用寓言动物作为道德典范提供了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lyrical liars, animal desires and figurative kinship: Robert Henryson's defence of poetry in the prologue to The Morall Fabillis
This article cites Robert Henryson's Fables in order to contextualise the history of the medieval notion that the world of imaginary, poetic fiction, needs justification; and examines the theological sources which served as the foundation of that debate and provided the validation for the use of fable animals as moral exemplars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innes Review
Innes Review RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Decretum fuit per burgenses: a fresh perspective on law-making in the medieval Scottish burghs A previous version of the Clashinore Letters Ruth Davidson's Conservatives: The Scottish Tory Party 2011–19, edited by David Torrance Front matter Bernard Aspinwall Prize Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1