A. Adeyemi, G. Uwerikowe, T. Tyagi, Jed Oukmal, M. Usman
{"title":"深海成熟油田复杂油藏再开发:Akpo油田案例研究","authors":"A. Adeyemi, G. Uwerikowe, T. Tyagi, Jed Oukmal, M. Usman","doi":"10.2118/198747-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With increasing complexity of reservoir developments, there is often a marked deviation from the field development plan (FDP), thus, requiring complementary developments with infill wells. This paper addresses this necessity whilst using the Akpo field reservoir B as a case study. Our case is an oil-bearing, highly faulted turbidite channel-levees system. The reservoir comprises three different units (Upper, Middle and Lower) with gross interval of about 140 m and good porosity and permeability values. The hydrocarbon-water contact (HWC) varies across fault blocks with little certainty about reservoir connectivity. It was assumed in the initial FDP that two producers located around the top structure would be supported by two injector wells located on the flanks near the HWC. In 2011, the first producer (Akpo-XP) was completed in the three units and equipped with an inflow control valve (ICV). From fluid samples collected and the selective acquisition of dynamic data from these intervals, results showed that the Upper unit was disconnected from the Middle and Lower units. Consequently, Akpo-XP was forced to produce only from the Middle and Lower units in order to be supported by a northern injector (Akpo-YW) in the same interval. To complete the initial development, another pair of wells (producer-injector) was drilled and completed in the upper unit. All wells were equipped with down-hole pressure gauges for connectivity assessment.\n In 2015, a seismic monitor was acquired, processed and interpreted whilst integrating production, injection and pressure data. The 4D seismic data confirmed specific fluid movements in the reservoir and a reservoir re-development could be sanctioned with two infill wells (one producer and one injector) with estimated increase in up to 16 Mboe of reserves and incremental production of 13 kbopd.\n A post-mortem analysis of these two infill wells showed a combined incremental production slightly above expectations.","PeriodicalId":11250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex Reservoir Re-Development in a Deep Offshore Maturing Field: Akpo Field Case Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Adeyemi, G. Uwerikowe, T. Tyagi, Jed Oukmal, M. Usman\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/198747-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n With increasing complexity of reservoir developments, there is often a marked deviation from the field development plan (FDP), thus, requiring complementary developments with infill wells. This paper addresses this necessity whilst using the Akpo field reservoir B as a case study. Our case is an oil-bearing, highly faulted turbidite channel-levees system. The reservoir comprises three different units (Upper, Middle and Lower) with gross interval of about 140 m and good porosity and permeability values. The hydrocarbon-water contact (HWC) varies across fault blocks with little certainty about reservoir connectivity. It was assumed in the initial FDP that two producers located around the top structure would be supported by two injector wells located on the flanks near the HWC. In 2011, the first producer (Akpo-XP) was completed in the three units and equipped with an inflow control valve (ICV). From fluid samples collected and the selective acquisition of dynamic data from these intervals, results showed that the Upper unit was disconnected from the Middle and Lower units. Consequently, Akpo-XP was forced to produce only from the Middle and Lower units in order to be supported by a northern injector (Akpo-YW) in the same interval. To complete the initial development, another pair of wells (producer-injector) was drilled and completed in the upper unit. All wells were equipped with down-hole pressure gauges for connectivity assessment.\\n In 2015, a seismic monitor was acquired, processed and interpreted whilst integrating production, injection and pressure data. The 4D seismic data confirmed specific fluid movements in the reservoir and a reservoir re-development could be sanctioned with two infill wells (one producer and one injector) with estimated increase in up to 16 Mboe of reserves and incremental production of 13 kbopd.\\n A post-mortem analysis of these two infill wells showed a combined incremental production slightly above expectations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/198747-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198747-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Complex Reservoir Re-Development in a Deep Offshore Maturing Field: Akpo Field Case Study
With increasing complexity of reservoir developments, there is often a marked deviation from the field development plan (FDP), thus, requiring complementary developments with infill wells. This paper addresses this necessity whilst using the Akpo field reservoir B as a case study. Our case is an oil-bearing, highly faulted turbidite channel-levees system. The reservoir comprises three different units (Upper, Middle and Lower) with gross interval of about 140 m and good porosity and permeability values. The hydrocarbon-water contact (HWC) varies across fault blocks with little certainty about reservoir connectivity. It was assumed in the initial FDP that two producers located around the top structure would be supported by two injector wells located on the flanks near the HWC. In 2011, the first producer (Akpo-XP) was completed in the three units and equipped with an inflow control valve (ICV). From fluid samples collected and the selective acquisition of dynamic data from these intervals, results showed that the Upper unit was disconnected from the Middle and Lower units. Consequently, Akpo-XP was forced to produce only from the Middle and Lower units in order to be supported by a northern injector (Akpo-YW) in the same interval. To complete the initial development, another pair of wells (producer-injector) was drilled and completed in the upper unit. All wells were equipped with down-hole pressure gauges for connectivity assessment.
In 2015, a seismic monitor was acquired, processed and interpreted whilst integrating production, injection and pressure data. The 4D seismic data confirmed specific fluid movements in the reservoir and a reservoir re-development could be sanctioned with two infill wells (one producer and one injector) with estimated increase in up to 16 Mboe of reserves and incremental production of 13 kbopd.
A post-mortem analysis of these two infill wells showed a combined incremental production slightly above expectations.