记录帝国的声音碎片:在非洲和英国之间执行任务

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13688790.2023.2243082
Erin Johnson-Williams
{"title":"记录帝国的声音碎片:在非洲和英国之间执行任务","authors":"Erin Johnson-Williams","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2023.2243082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Derrida’s work on ‘archive fever’ has prompted a great deal of academic reflection about the archive and what a critical ‘archiving’ of the past can imply for our understanding of the present. And yet, if the object of historical study is musical sound, what can a ‘fevered’ approach to the archive tell us through the silence of its dusty materials? When adding in the further complexity of a colonial context, the archiving of what Stoler has termed the ‘imperial debris’ of empire brings up a further conundrum: that of what I call here the ‘audible debris’ of empire: i.e. the sonic traces of power and resistance through musical sound that are otherwise absent from traditional historical narratives. In this article, I examine nineteenth-century British attitudes about music at the South African mission station of Lovedale in order to interrogate what a ‘destabilised’ archival awareness can bring to postcolonial musical scholarship. I ask how the structures of colonial archiving that created the imperial historiography of Lovedale (the ‘archival imaginary’) have influenced and reinforced the ‘disciplining strains’ of Lovedale’s musical activities. In turn, I also consider how these ‘disciplining strains’ have created audible legacies that are themselves musical archives of imperial processes.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"166 1","pages":"360 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archiving the audible debris of empire: on a mission between Africa and Britain\",\"authors\":\"Erin Johnson-Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13688790.2023.2243082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Derrida’s work on ‘archive fever’ has prompted a great deal of academic reflection about the archive and what a critical ‘archiving’ of the past can imply for our understanding of the present. And yet, if the object of historical study is musical sound, what can a ‘fevered’ approach to the archive tell us through the silence of its dusty materials? When adding in the further complexity of a colonial context, the archiving of what Stoler has termed the ‘imperial debris’ of empire brings up a further conundrum: that of what I call here the ‘audible debris’ of empire: i.e. the sonic traces of power and resistance through musical sound that are otherwise absent from traditional historical narratives. In this article, I examine nineteenth-century British attitudes about music at the South African mission station of Lovedale in order to interrogate what a ‘destabilised’ archival awareness can bring to postcolonial musical scholarship. I ask how the structures of colonial archiving that created the imperial historiography of Lovedale (the ‘archival imaginary’) have influenced and reinforced the ‘disciplining strains’ of Lovedale’s musical activities. In turn, I also consider how these ‘disciplining strains’ have created audible legacies that are themselves musical archives of imperial processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postcolonial Studies\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"360 - 385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postcolonial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2023.2243082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postcolonial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2023.2243082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德里达关于“档案热”的著作引发了大量关于档案的学术反思,以及对过去的批判性“存档”对我们理解现在意味着什么。然而,如果历史研究的对象是音乐的声音,那么“狂热”的方法可以通过尘封的材料的沉默告诉我们什么?当将殖民背景进一步复杂化时,斯托勒所称的帝国的“帝国碎片”的存档带来了一个进一步的难题:我在这里称之为帝国的“可听碎片”:即通过音乐声音的权力和抵抗的声音痕迹,否则在传统的历史叙述中是缺失的。在这篇文章中,我考察了19世纪英国人对南非洛夫代尔传教站音乐的态度,以探究“不稳定”的档案意识会给后殖民音乐学术带来什么。我问,创造了洛夫代尔帝国史学的殖民档案结构(“档案想象”)如何影响和加强了洛夫代尔音乐活动的“纪律张力”。反过来,我也考虑了这些“纪律的菌株”如何创造了听觉遗产,这些遗产本身就是帝国过程的音乐档案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Archiving the audible debris of empire: on a mission between Africa and Britain
ABSTRACT Derrida’s work on ‘archive fever’ has prompted a great deal of academic reflection about the archive and what a critical ‘archiving’ of the past can imply for our understanding of the present. And yet, if the object of historical study is musical sound, what can a ‘fevered’ approach to the archive tell us through the silence of its dusty materials? When adding in the further complexity of a colonial context, the archiving of what Stoler has termed the ‘imperial debris’ of empire brings up a further conundrum: that of what I call here the ‘audible debris’ of empire: i.e. the sonic traces of power and resistance through musical sound that are otherwise absent from traditional historical narratives. In this article, I examine nineteenth-century British attitudes about music at the South African mission station of Lovedale in order to interrogate what a ‘destabilised’ archival awareness can bring to postcolonial musical scholarship. I ask how the structures of colonial archiving that created the imperial historiography of Lovedale (the ‘archival imaginary’) have influenced and reinforced the ‘disciplining strains’ of Lovedale’s musical activities. In turn, I also consider how these ‘disciplining strains’ have created audible legacies that are themselves musical archives of imperial processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Compact colonialism: U.S. neocolonialism in Micronesia in the early twenty-first century Colonialism and politics from the abyss The world as abyss: the Caribbean and critical thought in the Anthropocene , by Jonathan Pugh and David Chandler, London, University of Westminster Press, 2023, 111 pp., US $16.00, softcover, ISBN: 9781915445308 Unsettled borders: the militarized science of surveillance on sacred Indigenous land Unsettled borders: the militarized science of surveillance on sacred Indigenous land , by Felicity Amaya Schaeffer, Durham, Duke University Press, 2022, 224 pp., US$27 (paperback), ISBN 9781478017943 Constructing theory from the ground up: a decolonial praxis Changing theory: concepts from the global south , edited by Dilip Menon, London and New York, Routledge, 2022, 367 pp., ₹1595 (hardback), ISBN 9781032417776 Representations of Edward Said Places of mind: a life of Edward Said , by Timothy Brennan, London, Bloomsbury, 2021, 464 pp., $22.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781526614650 On Edward Said: remembrance of things past , by Hamid Dabashi, Chicago, Haymarket Books, 2020, 250 pp., $19.95 (paperback), ISBN: 9781642592733 The selected works of Edward Said, 1966-2006 , edited by Moustafa Bayoumi and Andrew Rubin, London, Bloomsbury, 2021, 656 pp., $29.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781526623546
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1