脑电图对小儿晕厥的诊断价值标题:小儿晕厥的脑电图结果

A. M. Res, G. Yucel
{"title":"脑电图对小儿晕厥的诊断价值标题:小儿晕厥的脑电图结果","authors":"A. M. Res, G. Yucel","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In the investigation of the diagnosis of pediatric syncope, it was aimed to evaluate the rate of abnormal EEG findings and the diagnostic yield of the EEG in the electroencephalography (EEG) taken following their neurological examination. Materials and Methods: EEG records of 332 patients younger than 18 years of age who presented to the pediatric neurology outpatient clinic with syncope were retrospectively analyzed. The EEG results were classified as normal and abnormal. Based on the abnormal EEG results, four subgroups were formed as focal epileptiform discharge, generalized epileptiform discharge, focal slowing and generalized slowing. Abnormal EEG results were categorized according to age and gender. Results: Of the cases included in the study, 195 (58.7%) were female and 137 (41.3%) were male. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 12.67±3.21 years. Analysis of the EEG results revealed that 92.5% were normal and 7.53% were abnormal. The most common abnormal EEG finding was focal slowing, which was detected in 12 (3.6%) patients, followed by focal epileptiform discharge which was detected in eight (2.4%) and generalized epileptiform discharge which was detected in five (1.5%) patients. Conclusion: EEG should not be routinely performed to evaluate the diagnosis of pediatric syncope. Therefore, EEG should be performed only on patients to be selected based on their medical history and the results of their neurological examination. In this way, it will be possible to derive more benefits out of EEG and to reduce the associated medical costs.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of electroencephalography in pediatric patients presenting with syncope \\n\\nRunning title: The yield of electroencephalography in pediatric syncope\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Res, G. Yucel\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: In the investigation of the diagnosis of pediatric syncope, it was aimed to evaluate the rate of abnormal EEG findings and the diagnostic yield of the EEG in the electroencephalography (EEG) taken following their neurological examination. Materials and Methods: EEG records of 332 patients younger than 18 years of age who presented to the pediatric neurology outpatient clinic with syncope were retrospectively analyzed. The EEG results were classified as normal and abnormal. Based on the abnormal EEG results, four subgroups were formed as focal epileptiform discharge, generalized epileptiform discharge, focal slowing and generalized slowing. Abnormal EEG results were categorized according to age and gender. Results: Of the cases included in the study, 195 (58.7%) were female and 137 (41.3%) were male. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 12.67±3.21 years. Analysis of the EEG results revealed that 92.5% were normal and 7.53% were abnormal. The most common abnormal EEG finding was focal slowing, which was detected in 12 (3.6%) patients, followed by focal epileptiform discharge which was detected in eight (2.4%) and generalized epileptiform discharge which was detected in five (1.5%) patients. Conclusion: EEG should not be routinely performed to evaluate the diagnosis of pediatric syncope. Therefore, EEG should be performed only on patients to be selected based on their medical history and the results of their neurological examination. In this way, it will be possible to derive more benefits out of EEG and to reduce the associated medical costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.09.285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨小儿晕厥的诊断,评价脑电图异常的发生率及脑电图在神经学检查后的诊断率。材料与方法:回顾性分析332例18岁以下儿童神经内科门诊晕厥患者的脑电图记录。脑电图结果分为正常和异常。根据异常脑电图结果分为局灶性癫痫样放电、全发性癫痫样放电、局灶性慢化和全发性慢化4个亚组。异常脑电图结果按年龄和性别分类。结果:本组病例中,女性195例(58.7%),男性137例(41.3%)。患者平均年龄为12.67±3.21岁。脑电图结果分析显示92.5%正常,7.53%异常。最常见的异常EEG表现为局灶性慢化,12例(3.6%),其次为局灶性癫痫样放电,8例(2.4%),5例(1.5%)为全局性癫痫样放电。结论:脑电图不应作为评估小儿晕厥诊断的常规手段。因此,脑电图只应根据患者的病史和神经学检查结果进行选择。这样,就有可能从脑电图中获得更多的好处,并降低相关的医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic value of electroencephalography in pediatric patients presenting with syncope Running title: The yield of electroencephalography in pediatric syncope
Aim: In the investigation of the diagnosis of pediatric syncope, it was aimed to evaluate the rate of abnormal EEG findings and the diagnostic yield of the EEG in the electroencephalography (EEG) taken following their neurological examination. Materials and Methods: EEG records of 332 patients younger than 18 years of age who presented to the pediatric neurology outpatient clinic with syncope were retrospectively analyzed. The EEG results were classified as normal and abnormal. Based on the abnormal EEG results, four subgroups were formed as focal epileptiform discharge, generalized epileptiform discharge, focal slowing and generalized slowing. Abnormal EEG results were categorized according to age and gender. Results: Of the cases included in the study, 195 (58.7%) were female and 137 (41.3%) were male. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 12.67±3.21 years. Analysis of the EEG results revealed that 92.5% were normal and 7.53% were abnormal. The most common abnormal EEG finding was focal slowing, which was detected in 12 (3.6%) patients, followed by focal epileptiform discharge which was detected in eight (2.4%) and generalized epileptiform discharge which was detected in five (1.5%) patients. Conclusion: EEG should not be routinely performed to evaluate the diagnosis of pediatric syncope. Therefore, EEG should be performed only on patients to be selected based on their medical history and the results of their neurological examination. In this way, it will be possible to derive more benefits out of EEG and to reduce the associated medical costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The correlation between vitamin D levels and inflammation, as well as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in people who are over the age of 60. Anxiety, Depression and Coping Styles in Mothers of Children with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy The relationship between spousal support and depression, anxiety, stress, and prenatal attachment in high-risk pregnancies Comparison of serum iron, hemoglobin, ferritin and crp levels in prostate cancer patients with a control group Running title: Serum iron levels in prostate cancer Investigation of Electrocardiogram and Inflammation Parameters in Patients with First Episode Mania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1