SWAT与人工智能模型在印度佩德瓦古河流域月降雨径流分析中的性能比较

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.048
Padala Raja Shekar, Aneesh Mathew, A. Pandey, Avadhoot Bhosale
{"title":"SWAT与人工智能模型在印度佩德瓦古河流域月降雨径流分析中的性能比较","authors":"Padala Raja Shekar, Aneesh Mathew, A. Pandey, Avadhoot Bhosale","doi":"10.2166/aqua.2023.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Rainfall–runoff (R–R) analysis is essential for sustainable water resource management. In the present study focusing on the Peddavagu River Basin, various modelling approaches were explored, including the widely used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, as well as seven artificial intelligence (AI) models. The AI models consisted of six data-driven models, namely support vector regression, artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regression, k-nearest neighbour regression, and random forest regression, along with one deep learning model called long short-term memory (LSTM). To evaluate the performance of these models, a calibration period from 1990 to 2005 and a validation period from 2006 to 2010 were considered. The evaluation metrics used were R2 (coefficient of determination) and NSE (Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency). The study's findings revealed that all eight models yielded generally acceptable results for modelling the R–R process in the Peddavagu River Basin. Specifically, the LSTM demonstrated very good performance in simulating R–R during both the calibration period (R2 is 0.88 and NSE is 0.88) and the validation period (R2 is 0.88 and NSE is 0.85). In conclusion, the study highlighted the growing trend of adopting AI techniques, particularly the LSTM model, for R–R analysis.","PeriodicalId":34693,"journal":{"name":"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the performance of SWAT and artificial intelligence models for monthly rainfall–runoff analysis in the Peddavagu River Basin, India\",\"authors\":\"Padala Raja Shekar, Aneesh Mathew, A. Pandey, Avadhoot Bhosale\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/aqua.2023.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Rainfall–runoff (R–R) analysis is essential for sustainable water resource management. In the present study focusing on the Peddavagu River Basin, various modelling approaches were explored, including the widely used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, as well as seven artificial intelligence (AI) models. The AI models consisted of six data-driven models, namely support vector regression, artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regression, k-nearest neighbour regression, and random forest regression, along with one deep learning model called long short-term memory (LSTM). To evaluate the performance of these models, a calibration period from 1990 to 2005 and a validation period from 2006 to 2010 were considered. The evaluation metrics used were R2 (coefficient of determination) and NSE (Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency). The study's findings revealed that all eight models yielded generally acceptable results for modelling the R–R process in the Peddavagu River Basin. Specifically, the LSTM demonstrated very good performance in simulating R–R during both the calibration period (R2 is 0.88 and NSE is 0.88) and the validation period (R2 is 0.88 and NSE is 0.85). In conclusion, the study highlighted the growing trend of adopting AI techniques, particularly the LSTM model, for R–R analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

降雨径流(R-R)分析对可持续水资源管理至关重要。本研究以佩德瓦古河流域为研究对象,探索了多种建模方法,包括广泛使用的水土评估工具(SWAT)模型,以及7种人工智能(AI)模型。人工智能模型包括6个数据驱动模型,即支持向量回归、人工神经网络、多元线性回归、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)回归、k近邻回归和随机森林回归,以及一个名为长短期记忆(LSTM)的深度学习模型。为了评估这些模型的性能,我们考虑了1990 - 2005年的校准期和2006 - 2010年的验证期。使用的评价指标为R2(决定系数)和NSE(纳什-萨克利夫效率)。该研究的结果表明,所有8个模型在模拟佩德瓦古河流域的R-R过程时都产生了普遍可接受的结果。具体而言,LSTM在校正期(R2为0.88,NSE为0.88)和验证期(R2为0.88,NSE为0.85)均表现出非常好的R-R模拟性能。总之,该研究强调了采用人工智能技术,特别是LSTM模型进行R-R分析的日益增长的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the performance of SWAT and artificial intelligence models for monthly rainfall–runoff analysis in the Peddavagu River Basin, India
Rainfall–runoff (R–R) analysis is essential for sustainable water resource management. In the present study focusing on the Peddavagu River Basin, various modelling approaches were explored, including the widely used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, as well as seven artificial intelligence (AI) models. The AI models consisted of six data-driven models, namely support vector regression, artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) regression, k-nearest neighbour regression, and random forest regression, along with one deep learning model called long short-term memory (LSTM). To evaluate the performance of these models, a calibration period from 1990 to 2005 and a validation period from 2006 to 2010 were considered. The evaluation metrics used were R2 (coefficient of determination) and NSE (Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency). The study's findings revealed that all eight models yielded generally acceptable results for modelling the R–R process in the Peddavagu River Basin. Specifically, the LSTM demonstrated very good performance in simulating R–R during both the calibration period (R2 is 0.88 and NSE is 0.88) and the validation period (R2 is 0.88 and NSE is 0.85). In conclusion, the study highlighted the growing trend of adopting AI techniques, particularly the LSTM model, for R–R analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biogas production from water lilies, food waste, and sludge: substrate characterization and process performance How suitable is the gold-labelling method for the quantification of nanoplastics in natural water? Corrigendum: AQUA – Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society 72 (7), 1115–1129: Application of system dynamics model for reservoir performance under future climatic scenarios in Gelevard Dam, Iran, Ali Babolhakami, Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi and Alireza Emadi, https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.193 Exploring the rise of AI-based smart water management systems Unraveling air–water two-phase flow patterns in water pipelines based on multiple signals and convolutional neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1