COVID-19恢复期血浆;死亡率-安全性第一的前瞻性多中心FALP 001-2020试验结果

R. Gazitúa, J. Briones, C. Selman, F. Villarroel-Espíndola, Adam Aguirre-Ducler, RoxanaGonzalez-Steigmaier, K. Cereceda, M. Mahave, R. Morales, Fern, A. Yarad, Nicolas Yannez, M. Balcells, L. Rojas, B. Nervi, J. Nien, J. Garate, C. Prieto, S. Palma, CarolinaEscobar, Josefina Bascuñan, R. Muñoz, M. Pinto, Daniela Cardemil, Marcelo Navarrete, SoledadReyes, V. Espinosa, Betzabé Rubio, Pedro Ferrer-Rosende, J. Sapunar, H. Marsiglia, ChristianCaglevic
{"title":"COVID-19恢复期血浆;死亡率-安全性第一的前瞻性多中心FALP 001-2020试验结果","authors":"R. Gazitúa, J. Briones, C. Selman, F. Villarroel-Espíndola, Adam Aguirre-Ducler, RoxanaGonzalez-Steigmaier, K. Cereceda, M. Mahave, R. Morales, Fern, A. Yarad, Nicolas Yannez, M. Balcells, L. Rojas, B. Nervi, J. Nien, J. Garate, C. Prieto, S. Palma, CarolinaEscobar, Josefina Bascuñan, R. Muñoz, M. Pinto, Daniela Cardemil, Marcelo Navarrete, SoledadReyes, V. Espinosa, Betzabé Rubio, Pedro Ferrer-Rosende, J. Sapunar, H. Marsiglia, ChristianCaglevic","doi":"10.35248/2157-7560.21.S12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of Convalescent Plasma (CP) to treat COVID-19 has shown promising results; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and mortality of CP among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Study design and methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial is currently being conducted at nine hospitals in Chile. Patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 with less than 14 days since symptom onset were eligible. Enrolled patients were classified into four groups: Patients with cancer and severe COVID-19. Patients with cancer and non-severe COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 and patients with non-severe COVID-19 only. The intervention involved two 200-cc. CP transfusions with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers ≥ 1:320 collected from COVID-19-recovered donors Results: 192 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 received CP transfusions. At the first transfusion, 90.6% fulfilled the criteria for severity, and 41.1% required mechanical ventilation. 11.5% of the patients had cancer. Overall, 7-day and 30-day mortality since the first CP transfusion was 5.7% and 16.1% respectively. There were no differences at either time point in mortality between the four groups. Patients on mechanical ventilation when receiving CP had higher mortality rates than those who were not: 22.8% (95% C.I. 14.1-33.6%) vs. 11.5% (95% C.I. 6.3–18.9%) (p=0.037). Overall, 30-day mortality was higher in patients over 65 than in younger patients: 26.7% (95% C.I. 16.1– 39.7%) (p=0.019). Severe adverse events were reported in four patients (2.1%) with an overall transfusion-related lung injury rate of 1.56%. No CP-related deaths occurred. Discussion: CP is safe when used in patients with COVID-19 even when also presenting severity criteria or risk factors. Our mortality rate is comparable to reports from larger studies. Controlled clinical trials are required to determine efficacy. Conclusion: CP is safe when used in the COVID-19 population even for those who present severity criteria and/or risk factors for poor prognosis including cancer. In-depth analyses of the serological and molecular characteristics of CP are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention through controlled clinical trials. Registration: NCT04384588","PeriodicalId":17656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","volume":"9 21 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19; Mortality-Safety First Results of the Prospective Multicenter FALP 001-2020 Trial\",\"authors\":\"R. Gazitúa, J. Briones, C. Selman, F. Villarroel-Espíndola, Adam Aguirre-Ducler, RoxanaGonzalez-Steigmaier, K. Cereceda, M. Mahave, R. Morales, Fern, A. Yarad, Nicolas Yannez, M. Balcells, L. Rojas, B. Nervi, J. Nien, J. Garate, C. Prieto, S. Palma, CarolinaEscobar, Josefina Bascuñan, R. Muñoz, M. Pinto, Daniela Cardemil, Marcelo Navarrete, SoledadReyes, V. Espinosa, Betzabé Rubio, Pedro Ferrer-Rosende, J. Sapunar, H. Marsiglia, ChristianCaglevic\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2157-7560.21.S12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The use of Convalescent Plasma (CP) to treat COVID-19 has shown promising results; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and mortality of CP among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Study design and methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial is currently being conducted at nine hospitals in Chile. Patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 with less than 14 days since symptom onset were eligible. Enrolled patients were classified into four groups: Patients with cancer and severe COVID-19. Patients with cancer and non-severe COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 and patients with non-severe COVID-19 only. The intervention involved two 200-cc. CP transfusions with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers ≥ 1:320 collected from COVID-19-recovered donors Results: 192 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 received CP transfusions. At the first transfusion, 90.6% fulfilled the criteria for severity, and 41.1% required mechanical ventilation. 11.5% of the patients had cancer. Overall, 7-day and 30-day mortality since the first CP transfusion was 5.7% and 16.1% respectively. There were no differences at either time point in mortality between the four groups. Patients on mechanical ventilation when receiving CP had higher mortality rates than those who were not: 22.8% (95% C.I. 14.1-33.6%) vs. 11.5% (95% C.I. 6.3–18.9%) (p=0.037). Overall, 30-day mortality was higher in patients over 65 than in younger patients: 26.7% (95% C.I. 16.1– 39.7%) (p=0.019). Severe adverse events were reported in four patients (2.1%) with an overall transfusion-related lung injury rate of 1.56%. No CP-related deaths occurred. Discussion: CP is safe when used in patients with COVID-19 even when also presenting severity criteria or risk factors. Our mortality rate is comparable to reports from larger studies. Controlled clinical trials are required to determine efficacy. Conclusion: CP is safe when used in the COVID-19 population even for those who present severity criteria and/or risk factors for poor prognosis including cancer. In-depth analyses of the serological and molecular characteristics of CP are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention through controlled clinical trials. Registration: NCT04384588\",\"PeriodicalId\":17656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination\",\"volume\":\"9 21 1\",\"pages\":\"7-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7560.21.S12.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7560.21.S12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:使用恢复期血浆(CP)治疗COVID-19已显示出良好的效果;然而,其有效性仍不确定。本研究的目的是确定COVID-19住院患者使用CP的安全性和死亡率。研究设计和方法:这项多中心、开放标签、无控制的临床试验目前正在智利的9家医院进行。新冠肺炎住院时间小于14天的患者纳入研究对象。纳入的患者分为四组:癌症患者和重症COVID-19患者。癌症和非严重COVID-19患者。COVID-19重症患者和非重症患者。干预包括两次200cc。收集COVID-19康复献血者抗sars - cov -2 IgG滴度≥1:20 20的CP输注结果:192例COVID-19住院患者接受CP输注。第一次输血时,90.6%符合严重程度标准,41.1%需要机械通气。11.5%的患者患有癌症。总体而言,第一次CP输注后的7天和30天死亡率分别为5.7%和16.1%。在任何时间点上,四组之间的死亡率都没有差异。接受CP时机械通气的患者死亡率高于未接受CP的患者:22.8% (95% C.I. 14.1-33.6%)比11.5% (95% C.I. 6.3-18.9%) (p=0.037)。总体而言,65岁以上患者的30天死亡率高于年轻患者:26.7% (95% C.I. 16.1 - 39.7%) (p=0.019)。4例患者(2.1%)报告了严重不良事件,总体输血相关肺损伤率为1.56%。没有发生与cp相关的死亡。讨论:在COVID-19患者中使用CP是安全的,即使也有严重程度标准或风险因素。我们的死亡率与大型研究的报告相当。需要对照临床试验来确定疗效。结论:在COVID-19人群中使用CP是安全的,即使对于那些存在严重程度标准和/或预后不良风险因素(包括癌症)的人也是如此。需要深入分析CP的血清学和分子特征,通过对照临床试验来评估这种干预措施的效果。注册:NCT04384588
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19; Mortality-Safety First Results of the Prospective Multicenter FALP 001-2020 Trial
Background: The use of Convalescent Plasma (CP) to treat COVID-19 has shown promising results; however, its effectiveness remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and mortality of CP among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Study design and methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial is currently being conducted at nine hospitals in Chile. Patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 with less than 14 days since symptom onset were eligible. Enrolled patients were classified into four groups: Patients with cancer and severe COVID-19. Patients with cancer and non-severe COVID-19. Patients with severe COVID-19 and patients with non-severe COVID-19 only. The intervention involved two 200-cc. CP transfusions with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers ≥ 1:320 collected from COVID-19-recovered donors Results: 192 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 received CP transfusions. At the first transfusion, 90.6% fulfilled the criteria for severity, and 41.1% required mechanical ventilation. 11.5% of the patients had cancer. Overall, 7-day and 30-day mortality since the first CP transfusion was 5.7% and 16.1% respectively. There were no differences at either time point in mortality between the four groups. Patients on mechanical ventilation when receiving CP had higher mortality rates than those who were not: 22.8% (95% C.I. 14.1-33.6%) vs. 11.5% (95% C.I. 6.3–18.9%) (p=0.037). Overall, 30-day mortality was higher in patients over 65 than in younger patients: 26.7% (95% C.I. 16.1– 39.7%) (p=0.019). Severe adverse events were reported in four patients (2.1%) with an overall transfusion-related lung injury rate of 1.56%. No CP-related deaths occurred. Discussion: CP is safe when used in patients with COVID-19 even when also presenting severity criteria or risk factors. Our mortality rate is comparable to reports from larger studies. Controlled clinical trials are required to determine efficacy. Conclusion: CP is safe when used in the COVID-19 population even for those who present severity criteria and/or risk factors for poor prognosis including cancer. In-depth analyses of the serological and molecular characteristics of CP are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention through controlled clinical trials. Registration: NCT04384588
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential Transcription Profiling in Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Between Myasthenia Gravis Patients With or Without Thymoma Rapid screening for variants of concern in routine SARS-CoV-2 PCR diagnostics Mast Cells and COVID-19: a case report implicating a role of mast cell activation in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 Evaluating Child Malnutrition in Southern Belize Using an Anthropologic Screening Tool Sero-prevalence and risk factors for sheeppox in Kordofan states in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1