计算一个家庭的生活水平:一个或几个等效尺度?

Q3 Social Sciences Economie et Statistique Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1907
H. Martin
{"title":"计算一个家庭的生活水平:一个或几个等效尺度?","authors":"H. Martin","doi":"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[eng] Equivalence scales, used to compare the standard of living of households of different size and composition, take into account the economies of scale resulting from pooling income and expenditure within households. Two approaches can be used to estimate these scales: an “objective” approach based on modelling household consumption expenditure, or a \"subjective” approach based on how households perceive their standard of living. This article focuses on the latter. Using data from the 1995 to 2011 editions of the French Household Expenditure survey (Budget de famille) by Insee, estimations of equivalence scales highlight the sensitivity of results to the model specification, estimation coverage, the choice of subjective living standard indicators and the conventions used to calculate the cost of dependent children. . The subjective approach does not give a robust identification of a single equivalence scale. It does, however, provide a set of possible equivalence scales; for instance, the adult equivalent for a child under 14 ranges from 0.15 to 0.8, while standard equivalence scales are based on a convention, such as 0.3 for the OECD-modified equivalence scale. Thus, for studies using these instruments, or for public policy, it may be preferable to consider a set of equivalence scales rather than just a single scale.","PeriodicalId":38830,"journal":{"name":"Economie et Statistique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculating the standard of living of a household: one or several equivalence scales?\",\"authors\":\"H. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[eng] Equivalence scales, used to compare the standard of living of households of different size and composition, take into account the economies of scale resulting from pooling income and expenditure within households. Two approaches can be used to estimate these scales: an “objective” approach based on modelling household consumption expenditure, or a \\\"subjective” approach based on how households perceive their standard of living. This article focuses on the latter. Using data from the 1995 to 2011 editions of the French Household Expenditure survey (Budget de famille) by Insee, estimations of equivalence scales highlight the sensitivity of results to the model specification, estimation coverage, the choice of subjective living standard indicators and the conventions used to calculate the cost of dependent children. . The subjective approach does not give a robust identification of a single equivalence scale. It does, however, provide a set of possible equivalence scales; for instance, the adult equivalent for a child under 14 ranges from 0.15 to 0.8, while standard equivalence scales are based on a convention, such as 0.3 for the OECD-modified equivalence scale. Thus, for studies using these instruments, or for public policy, it may be preferable to consider a set of equivalence scales rather than just a single scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economie et Statistique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economie et Statistique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economie et Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24187/ECOSTAT.2017.491D.1907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

相等比额表是用来比较不同规模和组成的家庭的生活水平的,它考虑到在家庭内汇集收入和支出所产生的规模经济。可以使用两种方法来估计这些尺度:一种基于家庭消费支出模型的“客观”方法,或一种基于家庭如何看待其生活水平的“主观”方法。本文主要关注后者。使用法国国家统计局1995年至2011年版的法国家庭支出调查(Budget de famille)的数据,对等效尺度的估计突出了结果对模型规范、估计范围、主观生活水平指标的选择以及用于计算受抚养子女成本的惯例的敏感性。主观的方法不能给出一个单一的等效尺度的可靠的识别。然而,它确实提供了一套可能的等效尺度;例如,14岁以下儿童的成人当量在0.15至0.8之间,而标准等效量表是基于惯例的,例如经合组织修订的等效量表为0.3。因此,对于使用这些工具的研究或公共政策,最好考虑一套等效比额表,而不只是单一比额表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calculating the standard of living of a household: one or several equivalence scales?
[eng] Equivalence scales, used to compare the standard of living of households of different size and composition, take into account the economies of scale resulting from pooling income and expenditure within households. Two approaches can be used to estimate these scales: an “objective” approach based on modelling household consumption expenditure, or a "subjective” approach based on how households perceive their standard of living. This article focuses on the latter. Using data from the 1995 to 2011 editions of the French Household Expenditure survey (Budget de famille) by Insee, estimations of equivalence scales highlight the sensitivity of results to the model specification, estimation coverage, the choice of subjective living standard indicators and the conventions used to calculate the cost of dependent children. . The subjective approach does not give a robust identification of a single equivalence scale. It does, however, provide a set of possible equivalence scales; for instance, the adult equivalent for a child under 14 ranges from 0.15 to 0.8, while standard equivalence scales are based on a convention, such as 0.3 for the OECD-modified equivalence scale. Thus, for studies using these instruments, or for public policy, it may be preferable to consider a set of equivalence scales rather than just a single scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economie et Statistique
Economie et Statistique Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
The Health-Consumption Effects of Increasing Retirement Age Late in the Game Financial Support for Young Adults Through Tax and Social Transfers – Defamilialisation Scenarios Inequalities of Opportunity in the Use of Healthcare by Young Adults in France Young People’s Decisions in the Transition to Adulthood in France: The Influence of Family Factors The Links between Saving Rates, Income and Uncertainty: An Analysis based on the 2011 Household Budget Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1