{"title":"晚期胰腺癌患者一线FOLFIRINOX治疗失败后的二线化疗:回顾性分析","authors":"Lee Em","doi":"10.26420/austinjmedoncol.2021.1067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The first-line combination chemotherapy regimens, FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, there is no consensus therapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy. This objective of this study was to analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of subsequent chemotherapy in patients who failed first-line FOLFIRINOX. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of FOLFIRINOX at Kosin University Gaspel Hospital from January 2013 to July 2020. Results: Sixty-three patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received first-line FOLFIRINOX, and 33 (51.7%) of those patients received at least one cycle of second-line chemotherapy. At the start of second-line chemotherapy, the median age of patients was 59 years (range, 31-79), and 54.5% (61 patients) was male. The second-line chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel (21, 63.6%), gemcitabine/erlotinib (6, 18.2%), and gemcitabine monotherapy (6, 18.2%). Of twenty-five patients who had measurable disease, only 1 patient (4.0%) achieved a partial response, and the disease control rate was 56% (14 patients). The median Overall Survival (OS) was 8.7 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 5.2-12.2), and the median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.8). The median OS from starting FOLFIRINOX was14.7 months (95% CI, 10.4-18.3). There was no significant difference of median OS between second-line regimens. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy had modest survival benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of FOLFIRINOX.","PeriodicalId":8626,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of medical oncology","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after Failure of First-Line FOLFIRINOX: A Retrospective Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lee Em\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjmedoncol.2021.1067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The first-line combination chemotherapy regimens, FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, there is no consensus therapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy. This objective of this study was to analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of subsequent chemotherapy in patients who failed first-line FOLFIRINOX. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of FOLFIRINOX at Kosin University Gaspel Hospital from January 2013 to July 2020. Results: Sixty-three patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received first-line FOLFIRINOX, and 33 (51.7%) of those patients received at least one cycle of second-line chemotherapy. At the start of second-line chemotherapy, the median age of patients was 59 years (range, 31-79), and 54.5% (61 patients) was male. The second-line chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel (21, 63.6%), gemcitabine/erlotinib (6, 18.2%), and gemcitabine monotherapy (6, 18.2%). Of twenty-five patients who had measurable disease, only 1 patient (4.0%) achieved a partial response, and the disease control rate was 56% (14 patients). The median Overall Survival (OS) was 8.7 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 5.2-12.2), and the median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.8). The median OS from starting FOLFIRINOX was14.7 months (95% CI, 10.4-18.3). There was no significant difference of median OS between second-line regimens. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy had modest survival benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of FOLFIRINOX.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of medical oncology\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of medical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjmedoncol.2021.1067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of medical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjmedoncol.2021.1067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Second Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after Failure of First-Line FOLFIRINOX: A Retrospective Analysis
Background: The first-line combination chemotherapy regimens, FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, improved survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, there is no consensus therapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy. This objective of this study was to analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of subsequent chemotherapy in patients who failed first-line FOLFIRINOX. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of FOLFIRINOX at Kosin University Gaspel Hospital from January 2013 to July 2020. Results: Sixty-three patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received first-line FOLFIRINOX, and 33 (51.7%) of those patients received at least one cycle of second-line chemotherapy. At the start of second-line chemotherapy, the median age of patients was 59 years (range, 31-79), and 54.5% (61 patients) was male. The second-line chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine/ nab-paclitaxel (21, 63.6%), gemcitabine/erlotinib (6, 18.2%), and gemcitabine monotherapy (6, 18.2%). Of twenty-five patients who had measurable disease, only 1 patient (4.0%) achieved a partial response, and the disease control rate was 56% (14 patients). The median Overall Survival (OS) was 8.7 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 5.2-12.2), and the median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.8). The median OS from starting FOLFIRINOX was14.7 months (95% CI, 10.4-18.3). There was no significant difference of median OS between second-line regimens. Conclusion: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy had modest survival benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of FOLFIRINOX.