精神分裂症患者内化污名与洞察力的关系

S. Grover, Swapnajeet Sahoo, S. Chakrabarti, A. Avasthi
{"title":"精神分裂症患者内化污名与洞察力的关系","authors":"S. Grover, Swapnajeet Sahoo, S. Chakrabarti, A. Avasthi","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1381750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the association of internalized stigma with insight (clinical and cognitive insight) among patients with schizophrenia. Methods: 136 patients with schizophrenia were assessed on the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMIS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). Clinical insight was assessed by PANSS-G12 item. Results: 38.2% of patients experienced internalized stigma. On the basis of mean scores of various domains of ISMIS, about two-fifths (41.9%) of participants reported stereotype endorsement, followed by discrimination experience (38.2%), stigma resistance (36.8%), social withdrawal (30.1%) and alienation (30.1%). Insight as assessed by PANSS-G12 item did not correlate significantly with stigma. Higher cognitive insight in the form of composite score (R-C index) and higher cognitive self-reflectiveness was associated with a higher level of stigma in all the domains except for stigma resistance. Higher stigma was associated with negative symptoms. Conclusion: The present study suggests that internalized stigma is highly prevalent among patients with schizophrenia. Clinical insight doesn’t have any association with stigma, but cognitive insight in the form of self-reflectiveness is associated with higher stigma.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"44 1","pages":"338 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of internalized stigma and insight in patients with schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"S. Grover, Swapnajeet Sahoo, S. Chakrabarti, A. Avasthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17542863.2017.1381750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the association of internalized stigma with insight (clinical and cognitive insight) among patients with schizophrenia. Methods: 136 patients with schizophrenia were assessed on the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMIS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). Clinical insight was assessed by PANSS-G12 item. Results: 38.2% of patients experienced internalized stigma. On the basis of mean scores of various domains of ISMIS, about two-fifths (41.9%) of participants reported stereotype endorsement, followed by discrimination experience (38.2%), stigma resistance (36.8%), social withdrawal (30.1%) and alienation (30.1%). Insight as assessed by PANSS-G12 item did not correlate significantly with stigma. Higher cognitive insight in the form of composite score (R-C index) and higher cognitive self-reflectiveness was associated with a higher level of stigma in all the domains except for stigma resistance. Higher stigma was associated with negative symptoms. Conclusion: The present study suggests that internalized stigma is highly prevalent among patients with schizophrenia. Clinical insight doesn’t have any association with stigma, but cognitive insight in the form of self-reflectiveness is associated with higher stigma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"338 - 350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1381750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1381750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

摘要目的:探讨精神分裂症患者内化污名与洞察力(临床和认知洞察力)的关系。方法:对136例精神分裂症患者采用精神疾病内化污名量表(ISMIS)、阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)和贝克认知洞察力量表(BCIS)进行评估。采用PANSS-G12项目评估临床洞察力。结果:38.2%的患者有内化耻辱感。从ISMIS各领域的平均得分来看,约有五分之二(41.9%)的参与者认同刻板印象,其次是歧视经历(38.2%)、污名抵抗(36.8%)、社会退缩(30.1%)和疏离(30.1%)。PANSS-G12项目评估的洞察力与病耻感无显著相关。在综合得分(R-C指数)和认知自我反思方面,较高的认知洞察力和较高的认知自我反思在除污耻感抵抗外的所有领域都与较高的污耻感水平相关。较高的耻辱感与阴性症状相关。结论:本研究提示精神分裂症患者普遍存在内化病耻感。临床洞察力与病耻感没有任何联系,但自我反思形式的认知洞察力与更高的病耻感有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of internalized stigma and insight in patients with schizophrenia
ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the association of internalized stigma with insight (clinical and cognitive insight) among patients with schizophrenia. Methods: 136 patients with schizophrenia were assessed on the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMIS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS). Clinical insight was assessed by PANSS-G12 item. Results: 38.2% of patients experienced internalized stigma. On the basis of mean scores of various domains of ISMIS, about two-fifths (41.9%) of participants reported stereotype endorsement, followed by discrimination experience (38.2%), stigma resistance (36.8%), social withdrawal (30.1%) and alienation (30.1%). Insight as assessed by PANSS-G12 item did not correlate significantly with stigma. Higher cognitive insight in the form of composite score (R-C index) and higher cognitive self-reflectiveness was associated with a higher level of stigma in all the domains except for stigma resistance. Higher stigma was associated with negative symptoms. Conclusion: The present study suggests that internalized stigma is highly prevalent among patients with schizophrenia. Clinical insight doesn’t have any association with stigma, but cognitive insight in the form of self-reflectiveness is associated with higher stigma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
期刊最新文献
Acculturation, ethnic identity, and psychological well-being of Albanian-American immigrants in the United States Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) in children and adolescents Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees Disabled or Deaf? Investigating mental health clinicians’ knowledge of and attitude towards Deafness as a culture* Experiences of HIV stigma in rural Southern religious settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1