一般运动能力和人体测量学与五角球专项敏捷性表现关系不大;职业选手的多元回归分析

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Biomedical Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2478/bhk-2022-0032
D. Sekulić, Ivan Zeljko, Miran Pehar, M. Corluka, Šime Veršić, Sunčica Poček, P. Drid, Tonći Modrić
{"title":"一般运动能力和人体测量学与五角球专项敏捷性表现关系不大;职业选手的多元回归分析","authors":"D. Sekulić, Ivan Zeljko, Miran Pehar, M. Corluka, Šime Veršić, Sunčica Poček, P. Drid, Tonći Modrić","doi":"10.2478/bhk-2022-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Study aim: This study aimed to evaluate predictors of futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility in professional male futsal players. Material and methods: The players (n=75) studied were members of seven futsal teams that competed at the highest national level in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The predictors in this study included measures of generic power, speed, agility, and anthropometrics. The univariate and multivariate relationships among the predictors and the criteria (futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility) were assessed by using Pearson’s correlations and multiple regression analysis, respectively. Results: The predictors were poorly related to the different facets of agility (all trivial to moderate correlations). Multiple regression models were not successfully cross-validated for any of the types of agility performance. Conclusion: Generic power, speed, agility, and anthropometrics are not valid predictors of futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility. As these futsal performances were used to mimic real-game situations in futsal, these findings suggest that superiority in generic motor abilities and anthropometrics may not have a significant effect on performance in futsal matches.","PeriodicalId":44223,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","volume":"251 1","pages":"259 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generic motor abilities and anthropometrics are poorly related to futsal-specific agility performance; multiple regression analysis in professional players\",\"authors\":\"D. Sekulić, Ivan Zeljko, Miran Pehar, M. Corluka, Šime Veršić, Sunčica Poček, P. Drid, Tonći Modrić\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/bhk-2022-0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Study aim: This study aimed to evaluate predictors of futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility in professional male futsal players. Material and methods: The players (n=75) studied were members of seven futsal teams that competed at the highest national level in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The predictors in this study included measures of generic power, speed, agility, and anthropometrics. The univariate and multivariate relationships among the predictors and the criteria (futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility) were assessed by using Pearson’s correlations and multiple regression analysis, respectively. Results: The predictors were poorly related to the different facets of agility (all trivial to moderate correlations). Multiple regression models were not successfully cross-validated for any of the types of agility performance. Conclusion: Generic power, speed, agility, and anthropometrics are not valid predictors of futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility. As these futsal performances were used to mimic real-game situations in futsal, these findings suggest that superiority in generic motor abilities and anthropometrics may not have a significant effect on performance in futsal matches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Human Kinetics\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Human Kinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2022-0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2022-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要研究目的:本研究旨在评估五人制足球专业男子运动员的特定方向变化速度和特定反应敏捷性的预测因素。材料和方法:研究的球员(n=75)是在克罗地亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那参加最高国家水平比赛的七支五人制球队的成员。这项研究的预测指标包括一般力量、速度、敏捷性和人体测量。采用Pearson相关分析和多元回归分析,分别评估预测因子与标准(五人制足球专项的换向速度和五人制足球专项的反应敏捷性)之间的单因素和多因素关系。结果:预测因子与敏捷性的不同方面的相关性很差(都是微不足道到中等程度的相关性)。对于任何类型的敏捷性能,多重回归模型都没有成功地进行交叉验证。结论:一般的力量、速度、敏捷性和人体测量学并不能有效地预测五人制足球特定的改变方向速度和特定的反应敏捷性。由于这些五人制比赛的表现被用来模拟五人制比赛的真实情况,这些研究结果表明,在一般运动能力和人体测量学方面的优势可能对五人制比赛的表现没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generic motor abilities and anthropometrics are poorly related to futsal-specific agility performance; multiple regression analysis in professional players
Abstract Study aim: This study aimed to evaluate predictors of futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility in professional male futsal players. Material and methods: The players (n=75) studied were members of seven futsal teams that competed at the highest national level in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The predictors in this study included measures of generic power, speed, agility, and anthropometrics. The univariate and multivariate relationships among the predictors and the criteria (futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility) were assessed by using Pearson’s correlations and multiple regression analysis, respectively. Results: The predictors were poorly related to the different facets of agility (all trivial to moderate correlations). Multiple regression models were not successfully cross-validated for any of the types of agility performance. Conclusion: Generic power, speed, agility, and anthropometrics are not valid predictors of futsal-specific change-of-direction speed and futsal-specific reactive agility. As these futsal performances were used to mimic real-game situations in futsal, these findings suggest that superiority in generic motor abilities and anthropometrics may not have a significant effect on performance in futsal matches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Human Kinetics
Biomedical Human Kinetics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading idea is the health-directed quality of life. The journal thus covers many biomedical areas related to physical activity, e.g. physiology, biochemistry, biomechanics, anthropology, medical issues associated with physical activities, physical and motor development, psychological and sociological issues associated with physical activities, rehabilitation, health-related sport issues and fitness, etc.
期刊最新文献
Bone mineral density in the various regions of the skeleton in women with subclinical hypothyroidism: the effect of biological factors, bone turnover markers and physical activity Metabolic disturbances in sedentary and active Polish male students with normal body mass index and waist circumference Rifle and aiming point accelerations do not differ between the most and least accurate shots in biathlon shooting within an athlete Physical fitness and somatic structure in adolescent taekwondo athletes and untrained peers Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injuries in combat sports practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1