实用抗阻带训练干预妊娠期肌肉酸痛的效果:一项初步研究

E. White
{"title":"实用抗阻带训练干预妊娠期肌肉酸痛的效果:一项初步研究","authors":"E. White","doi":"10.33118/OAJ.PREG.2019.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\nMothers often experience muscle soreness following labor and delivery; however, this has yet to be examined. Purpose: To determine the effects of resistance bands on maternal muscle soreness when performed during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.\n\nMethods:\nWomen were randomized to an exercise (n = 12) or standard-care (n = 13) groups and completed surveys regarding muscle soreness. The exercise group performed a 15 week resistance band program 3 times/wk. Maternal, newborn, and delivery outcomes were measured. Change scores were calculated and comparisons were made using independent t-tests and chi-square tests.\n\nResults:\nTwenty-five women participated, mean age was 26.5 ± 3.4 years. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in muscle soreness and maternal and newborn outcomes. Mode of delivery was significantly different (p = 0.05) with the exercise group having more vaginal births (91.7%) compared to the standard care group (61.5%).\n\nConclusions:\nMuscle soreness was not significantly different, however, the mean values were in the expected direction. Further, there was a higher percentage of women in the exercise group having vaginal deliveries. Thus, while the sample size was small, these pilot findings have clinical importance, even if they are not statistically significant due to limited power. The use of resistance bands may be a practical intervention to increase the percentage of vaginal deliveries, the preferred mode of delivery. Confirming these results with a larger sample size is necessary.\n\nKeywords:\nExercise, Gestation, Vaginal birth, Pain management, Muscle soreness, Cesarean section, Pregnancy, Resistance training.","PeriodicalId":93345,"journal":{"name":"OA journal of pregnancy and child care","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a practical resistance band training intervention on muscle soreness during pregnancy: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"E. White\",\"doi\":\"10.33118/OAJ.PREG.2019.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:\\nMothers often experience muscle soreness following labor and delivery; however, this has yet to be examined. Purpose: To determine the effects of resistance bands on maternal muscle soreness when performed during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.\\n\\nMethods:\\nWomen were randomized to an exercise (n = 12) or standard-care (n = 13) groups and completed surveys regarding muscle soreness. The exercise group performed a 15 week resistance band program 3 times/wk. Maternal, newborn, and delivery outcomes were measured. Change scores were calculated and comparisons were made using independent t-tests and chi-square tests.\\n\\nResults:\\nTwenty-five women participated, mean age was 26.5 ± 3.4 years. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in muscle soreness and maternal and newborn outcomes. Mode of delivery was significantly different (p = 0.05) with the exercise group having more vaginal births (91.7%) compared to the standard care group (61.5%).\\n\\nConclusions:\\nMuscle soreness was not significantly different, however, the mean values were in the expected direction. Further, there was a higher percentage of women in the exercise group having vaginal deliveries. Thus, while the sample size was small, these pilot findings have clinical importance, even if they are not statistically significant due to limited power. The use of resistance bands may be a practical intervention to increase the percentage of vaginal deliveries, the preferred mode of delivery. Confirming these results with a larger sample size is necessary.\\n\\nKeywords:\\nExercise, Gestation, Vaginal birth, Pain management, Muscle soreness, Cesarean section, Pregnancy, Resistance training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OA journal of pregnancy and child care\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OA journal of pregnancy and child care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33118/OAJ.PREG.2019.01.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OA journal of pregnancy and child care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33118/OAJ.PREG.2019.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:母亲在分娩后经常经历肌肉酸痛;然而,这还有待检验。目的:确定阻力带对妊娠中期和晚期产妇肌肉酸痛的影响。方法:将女性随机分为运动组(n = 12)和标准护理组(n = 13),并完成有关肌肉酸痛的调查。运动组进行15周阻力带训练,每周3次。测量了产妇、新生儿和分娩结果。采用独立t检验和卡方检验计算变化分数并进行比较。结果:女性25例,平均年龄26.5±3.4岁。两组间肌肉酸痛及母婴预后无显著差异(p > 0.05)。分娩方式差异有统计学意义(p = 0.05),运动组阴道分娩率(91.7%)高于标准护理组(61.5%)。结论:肌肉酸痛无显著性差异,但平均值与预期方向一致。此外,在运动组中,阴道分娩的女性比例更高。因此,虽然样本量很小,但这些初步发现具有临床重要性,即使它们由于有限的功率而没有统计学意义。使用阻力带可能是一种实际的干预措施,以增加阴道分娩的百分比,首选的分娩方式。有必要用更大的样本量来证实这些结果。关键词:运动,妊娠,阴道分娩,疼痛管理,肌肉酸痛,剖宫产,妊娠,阻力训练
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of a practical resistance band training intervention on muscle soreness during pregnancy: A pilot study
Background: Mothers often experience muscle soreness following labor and delivery; however, this has yet to be examined. Purpose: To determine the effects of resistance bands on maternal muscle soreness when performed during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Methods: Women were randomized to an exercise (n = 12) or standard-care (n = 13) groups and completed surveys regarding muscle soreness. The exercise group performed a 15 week resistance band program 3 times/wk. Maternal, newborn, and delivery outcomes were measured. Change scores were calculated and comparisons were made using independent t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: Twenty-five women participated, mean age was 26.5 ± 3.4 years. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in muscle soreness and maternal and newborn outcomes. Mode of delivery was significantly different (p = 0.05) with the exercise group having more vaginal births (91.7%) compared to the standard care group (61.5%). Conclusions: Muscle soreness was not significantly different, however, the mean values were in the expected direction. Further, there was a higher percentage of women in the exercise group having vaginal deliveries. Thus, while the sample size was small, these pilot findings have clinical importance, even if they are not statistically significant due to limited power. The use of resistance bands may be a practical intervention to increase the percentage of vaginal deliveries, the preferred mode of delivery. Confirming these results with a larger sample size is necessary. Keywords: Exercise, Gestation, Vaginal birth, Pain management, Muscle soreness, Cesarean section, Pregnancy, Resistance training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of the level of maternal education on the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of Saudi infants with birth weight of 1000-1500 grams at the age of 21-24 months Effects of a practical resistance band training intervention on muscle soreness during pregnancy: A pilot study Beneficial effects of nicotinamide on the mouse model of preeclampsia. Perinatal depression effects: A narrative review Women’s traumatic childbirth experiences: Reflections and implications for practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1