为什么免费托儿未能成为韩国全民托儿的有效政策实施

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2021.1955644
Sung-Hee Lee
{"title":"为什么免费托儿未能成为韩国全民托儿的有效政策实施","authors":"Sung-Hee Lee","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1955644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper is aimed at exploring how the meaning of universal free childcare was communicated during the first policy initiation process in 2012. In order to do so, interpretative policy analysis was utilised as a methodological approach, whilst relevant policy documents and in-depth interviews were used for data collection. I argue that failings occurred because the policy implementation was placed on the agenda with a lack of commitment to increasing the number of public childcare centres, as well as disengagement from understanding the gender relations necessary for delivering universal childcare effectively.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"558 - 574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why the initiative of free childcare failed to be an effective policy implementation of universal childcare in South Korea\",\"authors\":\"Sung-Hee Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17516234.2021.1955644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The paper is aimed at exploring how the meaning of universal free childcare was communicated during the first policy initiation process in 2012. In order to do so, interpretative policy analysis was utilised as a methodological approach, whilst relevant policy documents and in-depth interviews were used for data collection. I argue that failings occurred because the policy implementation was placed on the agenda with a lack of commitment to increasing the number of public childcare centres, as well as disengagement from understanding the gender relations necessary for delivering universal childcare effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"558 - 574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1955644\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1955644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在探讨在2012年首次政策启动过程中,普遍免费托儿的意义是如何传达的。为了做到这一点,解释性政策分析被用作方法方法,而相关政策文件和深度访谈被用于数据收集。我认为,之所以出现失败,是因为政策实施被提上了议程,但没有承诺增加公共托儿中心的数量,也没有理解有效提供普遍托儿服务所必需的性别关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why the initiative of free childcare failed to be an effective policy implementation of universal childcare in South Korea
ABSTRACT The paper is aimed at exploring how the meaning of universal free childcare was communicated during the first policy initiation process in 2012. In order to do so, interpretative policy analysis was utilised as a methodological approach, whilst relevant policy documents and in-depth interviews were used for data collection. I argue that failings occurred because the policy implementation was placed on the agenda with a lack of commitment to increasing the number of public childcare centres, as well as disengagement from understanding the gender relations necessary for delivering universal childcare effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The effect of incentives and procedure simplification in policy implementation: evidence from a survey experiment on waste sorting Situated usage of generative AI in policy education: implications for teaching, learning, and research Scaling up policy entrepreneurship strategies from the local to the national level: the unlikely rise of basic income from agenda universe to decision agenda Unveiling the impact of policy entrepreneurs on South Korea’s social economy: a media analysis Digital regulation, enforcement attitudes, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats during a pandemic emergency: an experimental study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1