对印度尼西亚接受水稻和肉牛综合养殖障碍的实证研究

S. H. Purnomo, A. I. Sari, S. Emawati, E. T. Rahayu
{"title":"对印度尼西亚接受水稻和肉牛综合养殖障碍的实证研究","authors":"S. H. Purnomo, A. I. Sari, S. Emawati, E. T. Rahayu","doi":"10.55493/5005.v13i2.4809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to identify the barriers to the spread of integrated paddy and beef cattle farming and the influence of these barriers on Indonesian farmers’ acceptance of integrated farming. Quantitative methods were used to examine the barriers to integrated agriculture acceptance. A direct survey was conducted in which questionnaires were distributed to respondents. In addition, a research framework for the acceptance of integrated agriculture was developed using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Several data analysis methods were employed, including descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modelling (SEM). Data were obtained from 310 organic paddy farmers in Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The data were analysed using LISREL 8.8 software to assess the influence of barriers on the acceptance of integrated farming. SEM yielded the following results: x2 degree 1.77, GFI 0.92, AGFI 0.90, CFI 0.94, and RMSEA 0.06. As a result, we concluded that the goodness-of-fit index met the recommended criteria and that the model corresponded to the data provided, which allowed us to continue with the hypothesis testing. The results of hypothesis testing showed that the factors that significantly influenced the acceptance of integrated farming were barriers in the areas of production, knowledge, government, and economics. The practical implication of the research results is that by reducing barriers to production, knowledge, government, and economics, the acceptance of paddy and beef cattle integration can be increased.","PeriodicalId":36876,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical examination of barriers to acceptance of integrated paddy and beef cattle farming in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"S. H. Purnomo, A. I. Sari, S. Emawati, E. T. Rahayu\",\"doi\":\"10.55493/5005.v13i2.4809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to identify the barriers to the spread of integrated paddy and beef cattle farming and the influence of these barriers on Indonesian farmers’ acceptance of integrated farming. Quantitative methods were used to examine the barriers to integrated agriculture acceptance. A direct survey was conducted in which questionnaires were distributed to respondents. In addition, a research framework for the acceptance of integrated agriculture was developed using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Several data analysis methods were employed, including descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modelling (SEM). Data were obtained from 310 organic paddy farmers in Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The data were analysed using LISREL 8.8 software to assess the influence of barriers on the acceptance of integrated farming. SEM yielded the following results: x2 degree 1.77, GFI 0.92, AGFI 0.90, CFI 0.94, and RMSEA 0.06. As a result, we concluded that the goodness-of-fit index met the recommended criteria and that the model corresponded to the data provided, which allowed us to continue with the hypothesis testing. The results of hypothesis testing showed that the factors that significantly influenced the acceptance of integrated farming were barriers in the areas of production, knowledge, government, and economics. The practical implication of the research results is that by reducing barriers to production, knowledge, government, and economics, the acceptance of paddy and beef cattle integration can be increased.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v13i2.4809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v13i2.4809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定水稻和肉牛综合养殖传播的障碍,以及这些障碍对印度尼西亚农民接受综合养殖的影响。采用定量方法考察了综合农业接受的障碍。我们进行了直接调查,向受访者分发了问卷。此外,利用技术接受模型(TAM)构建了综合农业接受度研究框架。采用了几种数据分析方法,包括描述性分析、验证性因子分析(CFA)和结构方程模型(SEM)。数据来自印度尼西亚中爪哇Boyolali县的310名有机水田农民。利用LISREL 8.8软件对数据进行分析,以评估障碍对综合农业接受度的影响。SEM结果如下:x2度1.77,GFI 0.92, AGFI 0.90, CFI 0.94, RMSEA 0.06。因此,我们得出结论,拟合优度指数符合推荐标准,模型与提供的数据相对应,这使得我们可以继续进行假设检验。假设检验结果表明,生产障碍、知识障碍、政府障碍和经济障碍是影响农户接受综合农业的主要因素。研究结果的现实意义在于,通过减少生产障碍、知识障碍、政府障碍和经济障碍,可以提高稻田和肉牛一体化的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An empirical examination of barriers to acceptance of integrated paddy and beef cattle farming in Indonesia
This research aims to identify the barriers to the spread of integrated paddy and beef cattle farming and the influence of these barriers on Indonesian farmers’ acceptance of integrated farming. Quantitative methods were used to examine the barriers to integrated agriculture acceptance. A direct survey was conducted in which questionnaires were distributed to respondents. In addition, a research framework for the acceptance of integrated agriculture was developed using the technology acceptance model (TAM). Several data analysis methods were employed, including descriptive analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modelling (SEM). Data were obtained from 310 organic paddy farmers in Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. The data were analysed using LISREL 8.8 software to assess the influence of barriers on the acceptance of integrated farming. SEM yielded the following results: x2 degree 1.77, GFI 0.92, AGFI 0.90, CFI 0.94, and RMSEA 0.06. As a result, we concluded that the goodness-of-fit index met the recommended criteria and that the model corresponded to the data provided, which allowed us to continue with the hypothesis testing. The results of hypothesis testing showed that the factors that significantly influenced the acceptance of integrated farming were barriers in the areas of production, knowledge, government, and economics. The practical implication of the research results is that by reducing barriers to production, knowledge, government, and economics, the acceptance of paddy and beef cattle integration can be increased.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development
Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Mitigating the impact of mercury on rural people by providing scenarios on alternative income through corn farming improvement Estimating cost efficiency and sources of inefficiency in paddy farming: A study in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta Analysis of producer behavior towards organic vegetables in Vientiane capital, Lao PDR An analysis of environmental and economic impacts of the system of rice intensification : A case study in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam Application of trichoderma and aspergillus as biofertilizers in eco-friendly ratoon rice cultivation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1