研究听觉大象威慑物的声学相似性以优化现有技术

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4111
Suhana Shrivastava, E. Buchholtz
{"title":"研究听觉大象威慑物的声学相似性以优化现有技术","authors":"Suhana Shrivastava, E. Buchholtz","doi":"10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary reasons elephants are endangered is human-elephant conflict (HEC), the opposition that occurs between elephants and the humans living nearby. The violence that erupts in settings of HEC, such as crop fields, often results in both human and elephant deaths as both species struggle to coexist. Many methods are being researched to mitigate HEC, including playing audio playbacks that trigger flight responses in elephants near crop fields and reduce chance of contact and destruction. Habituation to these stimuli creates the demand for a greater number and more types of auditory deterrents, but it would be unethical and inefficient to immediately jump to tests with crop fields without first verifying these playbacks are at least somewhat effective. Thus, this paper aims to analyze currently used auditory deterrents to determine if any acoustic similarities exist between them, and create a generalization for what characteristics make up an effective auditory deterrent. The results will help optimize current playbacks and help create a threshold of characteristics to use before future testing, to reduce habituation and human-elephant conflict.","PeriodicalId":46753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Acoustic Similarities of Auditory Elephant Deterrents to Optimize Current Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Suhana Shrivastava, E. Buchholtz\",\"doi\":\"10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the primary reasons elephants are endangered is human-elephant conflict (HEC), the opposition that occurs between elephants and the humans living nearby. The violence that erupts in settings of HEC, such as crop fields, often results in both human and elephant deaths as both species struggle to coexist. Many methods are being researched to mitigate HEC, including playing audio playbacks that trigger flight responses in elephants near crop fields and reduce chance of contact and destruction. Habituation to these stimuli creates the demand for a greater number and more types of auditory deterrents, but it would be unethical and inefficient to immediately jump to tests with crop fields without first verifying these playbacks are at least somewhat effective. Thus, this paper aims to analyze currently used auditory deterrents to determine if any acoustic similarities exist between them, and create a generalization for what characteristics make up an effective auditory deterrent. The results will help optimize current playbacks and help create a threshold of characteristics to use before future testing, to reduce habituation and human-elephant conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v12i2.4111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大象濒临灭绝的主要原因之一是人象冲突(HEC),即大象与生活在附近的人类之间发生的冲突。在HEC环境中爆发的暴力事件,如农田,往往导致人类和大象死亡,因为这两个物种难以共存。目前正在研究许多方法来减轻HEC,包括播放音频回放,以触发农田附近大象的飞行反应,减少接触和破坏的机会。对这些刺激的习惯产生了对更多数量和更多类型的听觉威慑的需求,但在没有首先验证这些回放至少在某种程度上有效的情况下立即跳到农田测试是不道德和低效的。因此,本文旨在分析目前使用的听觉威慑,以确定它们之间是否存在声学相似性,并对构成有效听觉威慑的特征进行概括。结果将有助于优化当前的回放,并有助于在未来测试之前创建一个特征阈值,以减少习惯化和人象冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating Acoustic Similarities of Auditory Elephant Deterrents to Optimize Current Techniques
One of the primary reasons elephants are endangered is human-elephant conflict (HEC), the opposition that occurs between elephants and the humans living nearby. The violence that erupts in settings of HEC, such as crop fields, often results in both human and elephant deaths as both species struggle to coexist. Many methods are being researched to mitigate HEC, including playing audio playbacks that trigger flight responses in elephants near crop fields and reduce chance of contact and destruction. Habituation to these stimuli creates the demand for a greater number and more types of auditory deterrents, but it would be unethical and inefficient to immediately jump to tests with crop fields without first verifying these playbacks are at least somewhat effective. Thus, this paper aims to analyze currently used auditory deterrents to determine if any acoustic similarities exist between them, and create a generalization for what characteristics make up an effective auditory deterrent. The results will help optimize current playbacks and help create a threshold of characteristics to use before future testing, to reduce habituation and human-elephant conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The vision of the Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice (JSARP) is to publish the most rigorous, relevant, and well-respected research and practice making a difference in student affairs practice. JSARP especially encourages manuscripts that are unconventional in nature and that engage in methodological and epistemological extensions that transcend the boundaries of traditional research inquiries.
期刊最新文献
How White Undergraduates Experience and Make Meaning of Parental Messages about Race The Overlooked Influence of Advising and Supporting Upon Leadership in Student Affairs Delivering on the Promise of High-Impact Practices: Research and Models for Achieving Equity, Fidelity, Impact, and Scale LGBTQ Leadership in Higher Education How Sorority and Fraternity Life Professionals Validate Culturally Based Sororities and Fraternities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1