条款和条件适用:在种族,性别和性取向的交叉点上的象征性偏见

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics Groups and Identities Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI:10.1080/21565503.2022.2026793
Ryan Bell
{"title":"条款和条件适用:在种族,性别和性取向的交叉点上的象征性偏见","authors":"Ryan Bell","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2022.2026793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Measures of prejudice like racial resentment and modern sexism neglect how systems of power intersect and shape individuals' attitudes towards others. If these measures depend on which racial, gender, or sexuality subgroup of Black people or women are asked about, prejudice towards these overarching groups cannot be quantified and understood without analyzing the connections between (hetero)sexism and racism. I use a question wording experiment to test whether changing the subject of these batteries affects respondents' answers. Reported prejudice varies by the subgroups asked about and respondents' own ascribed identities. Racial attitudes are relatively fixed; reported sexism towards white and Black women changes by respondent race; heterosexism is pervasive; and the strength of the association between resentment and sexism varies based on the mentioned (sub)groups. These measures should be updated by applying the insights from the work on intersectionality to account for how individuals constitute groups to capture this variation in attitudes.","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"4 1","pages":"685 - 709"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terms and conditions apply: symbolic prejudice at the intersections of race, gender, and sexuality\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21565503.2022.2026793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Measures of prejudice like racial resentment and modern sexism neglect how systems of power intersect and shape individuals' attitudes towards others. If these measures depend on which racial, gender, or sexuality subgroup of Black people or women are asked about, prejudice towards these overarching groups cannot be quantified and understood without analyzing the connections between (hetero)sexism and racism. I use a question wording experiment to test whether changing the subject of these batteries affects respondents' answers. Reported prejudice varies by the subgroups asked about and respondents' own ascribed identities. Racial attitudes are relatively fixed; reported sexism towards white and Black women changes by respondent race; heterosexism is pervasive; and the strength of the association between resentment and sexism varies based on the mentioned (sub)groups. These measures should be updated by applying the insights from the work on intersectionality to account for how individuals constitute groups to capture this variation in attitudes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"685 - 709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2026793\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2026793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

种族怨恨和现代性别歧视等偏见的衡量标准忽视了权力体系是如何相互交织并塑造个人对他人的态度的。如果这些措施取决于黑人或女性的种族、性别或性取向子群体,那么不分析(异性恋)性别歧视和种族主义之间的联系,就无法量化和理解对这些主要群体的偏见。我用一个问题措辞实验来测试改变这些电池的主题是否会影响受访者的答案。报告的偏见因被问及的子群体和受访者自己的身份而异。种族态度相对固定;对白人和黑人女性的性别歧视因种族而异;异性恋普遍存在;怨恨和性别歧视之间的联系强度因提到的(子)群体而异。这些措施应该通过应用交叉性研究的见解来更新,以解释个人如何构成群体,以捕捉这种态度的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Terms and conditions apply: symbolic prejudice at the intersections of race, gender, and sexuality
ABSTRACT Measures of prejudice like racial resentment and modern sexism neglect how systems of power intersect and shape individuals' attitudes towards others. If these measures depend on which racial, gender, or sexuality subgroup of Black people or women are asked about, prejudice towards these overarching groups cannot be quantified and understood without analyzing the connections between (hetero)sexism and racism. I use a question wording experiment to test whether changing the subject of these batteries affects respondents' answers. Reported prejudice varies by the subgroups asked about and respondents' own ascribed identities. Racial attitudes are relatively fixed; reported sexism towards white and Black women changes by respondent race; heterosexism is pervasive; and the strength of the association between resentment and sexism varies based on the mentioned (sub)groups. These measures should be updated by applying the insights from the work on intersectionality to account for how individuals constitute groups to capture this variation in attitudes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Viewers like you: the effect of elite co-identity reinforcement on U.S. immigration attitudes A nation of immigrants? The case for a politically influential and intersectional immigrant identity in the United States White candidate support continues amidst explicit and implicit white identity cues Envisioning a world without prisons: group concept mapping as a collective strategy for justice and dignity Trump’s African Americans? Racial resentment and Black support for Trump in the 2020 elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1