Kyoko Kishimoto, Matthew D. Barton, Edward M. Sadrai, Michael B. Dando, Sharon Cogdill
{"title":"“我是真的吗?”《星际迷航:皮卡德》中的混杂性、战略多样性和自我实现","authors":"Kyoko Kishimoto, Matthew D. Barton, Edward M. Sadrai, Michael B. Dando, Sharon Cogdill","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This analysis takes up hybridity to consider how dominant ideologies of assimilation, hegemony, and homogeneity in the world today shape the way entertainment, and in this case Star Trek: Picard, is written and produced, with particular attention to Picard himself, Soji Asha, Seven of Nine, Hugh, and Rios. With this framework, we can see past the tropes (like the white savior, \"liberal\" multiculturalism, and sci-fi's utopian/optimistic imaginings of a world without racism and sexism) that the show seems to promulgate unconsciously to a richer, complexified reading of hybridity as nonconsensual and strategic multiplicity as resistance to hegemony.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Am I real?\\\": Hybridity, Strategic Multiplicity, and Self-Actualization in Star Trek: Picard\",\"authors\":\"Kyoko Kishimoto, Matthew D. Barton, Edward M. Sadrai, Michael B. Dando, Sharon Cogdill\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This analysis takes up hybridity to consider how dominant ideologies of assimilation, hegemony, and homogeneity in the world today shape the way entertainment, and in this case Star Trek: Picard, is written and produced, with particular attention to Picard himself, Soji Asha, Seven of Nine, Hugh, and Rios. With this framework, we can see past the tropes (like the white savior, \\\"liberal\\\" multiculturalism, and sci-fi's utopian/optimistic imaginings of a world without racism and sexism) that the show seems to promulgate unconsciously to a richer, complexified reading of hybridity as nonconsensual and strategic multiplicity as resistance to hegemony.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.23.3.0338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本分析以杂杂性为基础,考虑当今世界的同化、霸权和同质性的主流意识形态是如何塑造娱乐方式的,在本例中是《星际迷航:皮卡德》的写作和制作方式,并特别关注皮卡德本人、Soji Asha、Seven of Nine、Hugh和Rios。在这个框架下,我们可以看到这部剧似乎在无意识中传播的那些比喻(比如白人救世主、“自由主义”多元文化主义,以及科幻小说中对一个没有种族主义和性别歧视的世界的乌托邦/乐观想象),以及对杂糅性的更丰富、更复杂的解读,这种杂糅性是一种非共识的、战略性的多样性,是对霸权的抵抗。
"Am I real?": Hybridity, Strategic Multiplicity, and Self-Actualization in Star Trek: Picard
abstract:This analysis takes up hybridity to consider how dominant ideologies of assimilation, hegemony, and homogeneity in the world today shape the way entertainment, and in this case Star Trek: Picard, is written and produced, with particular attention to Picard himself, Soji Asha, Seven of Nine, Hugh, and Rios. With this framework, we can see past the tropes (like the white savior, "liberal" multiculturalism, and sci-fi's utopian/optimistic imaginings of a world without racism and sexism) that the show seems to promulgate unconsciously to a richer, complexified reading of hybridity as nonconsensual and strategic multiplicity as resistance to hegemony.