儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)在儿科创伤患者中的有效性——来自巴基斯坦一家三级医院的横断面研究

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI:10.21649/akemu.v28i1.4994
Naureen Naseer, N. Kapadia, Sarwat Masud
{"title":"儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)在儿科创伤患者中的有效性——来自巴基斯坦一家三级医院的横断面研究","authors":"Naureen Naseer, N. Kapadia, Sarwat Masud","doi":"10.21649/akemu.v28i1.4994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Head trauma in the pediatric age group is a common presentation in the Emergency Room (ER). The\nPediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) tool can help an ER clinician to identify pediatric head\ntrauma patients at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) and avoid unnecessary CT scans.\nObjective: To determine the validity of PECARN rule as compared to the head CT (gold standard) in identifying low risk\ntraumatic brain injury pediatric patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) Emergency Department ED. All pediatric head trauma patients were included in this study between 2017-2019. A total of 218 head trauma cases were reviewed which were evaluated for the PECARN criteria. Data were extracted on a prepared data collection form. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS. Chi-square test was used. Results: Among the total 218, 190 cases (87%) had CT scans ordered. Out of these 190 patients 156 (82%) met PECARN criteria, while 34 (18%) were PECARN negative. The sensitivity and specificity of PECARN was calculated as 82% and 33% respectively, with a fair level of agreement with CT scan based on Kappa statistics. Conclusion: PECARN has a higher sensitivity but lower specificity in comparison to CT scan. ","PeriodicalId":43918,"journal":{"name":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) in Pediatric Trauma Patients - A Cross Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Naureen Naseer, N. Kapadia, Sarwat Masud\",\"doi\":\"10.21649/akemu.v28i1.4994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Head trauma in the pediatric age group is a common presentation in the Emergency Room (ER). The\\nPediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) tool can help an ER clinician to identify pediatric head\\ntrauma patients at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) and avoid unnecessary CT scans.\\nObjective: To determine the validity of PECARN rule as compared to the head CT (gold standard) in identifying low risk\\ntraumatic brain injury pediatric patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) Emergency Department ED. All pediatric head trauma patients were included in this study between 2017-2019. A total of 218 head trauma cases were reviewed which were evaluated for the PECARN criteria. Data were extracted on a prepared data collection form. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS. Chi-square test was used. Results: Among the total 218, 190 cases (87%) had CT scans ordered. Out of these 190 patients 156 (82%) met PECARN criteria, while 34 (18%) were PECARN negative. The sensitivity and specificity of PECARN was calculated as 82% and 33% respectively, with a fair level of agreement with CT scan based on Kappa statistics. Conclusion: PECARN has a higher sensitivity but lower specificity in comparison to CT scan. \",\"PeriodicalId\":43918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v28i1.4994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v28i1.4994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:头部创伤在儿科年龄组是一个常见的表现在急诊室(ER)。儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECARN)工具可以帮助急诊室临床医生识别临床重要创伤性脑损伤(ciTBIs)风险极低的儿科颅脑损伤患者,并避免不必要的CT扫描。目的:比较PECARN规则与头颅CT(金标准)鉴别低风险颅脑损伤患儿的有效性。方法:在阿迦汗大学医院(AKUH)急诊科进行了一项横断面研究。该研究纳入了2017-2019年期间所有儿科头部创伤患者。总共218例头部创伤病例进行了审查,并根据PECARN标准进行了评估。数据从准备好的数据收集表上提取。数据录入并使用SPSS进行分析。采用卡方检验。结果:218例患者中,190例(87%)行CT扫描。在这190例患者中,156例(82%)符合PECARN标准,34例(18%)为PECARN阴性。PECARN的敏感性和特异性分别为82%和33%,根据Kappa统计与CT扫描具有相当的一致性。结论:PECARN与CT扫描相比具有较高的敏感性和较低的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) in Pediatric Trauma Patients - A Cross Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan
Introduction: Head trauma in the pediatric age group is a common presentation in the Emergency Room (ER). The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) tool can help an ER clinician to identify pediatric head trauma patients at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) and avoid unnecessary CT scans. Objective: To determine the validity of PECARN rule as compared to the head CT (gold standard) in identifying low risk traumatic brain injury pediatric patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) Emergency Department ED. All pediatric head trauma patients were included in this study between 2017-2019. A total of 218 head trauma cases were reviewed which were evaluated for the PECARN criteria. Data were extracted on a prepared data collection form. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS. Chi-square test was used. Results: Among the total 218, 190 cases (87%) had CT scans ordered. Out of these 190 patients 156 (82%) met PECARN criteria, while 34 (18%) were PECARN negative. The sensitivity and specificity of PECARN was calculated as 82% and 33% respectively, with a fair level of agreement with CT scan based on Kappa statistics. Conclusion: PECARN has a higher sensitivity but lower specificity in comparison to CT scan. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vaccination Readiness of COVID-19 and Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Among Young Adults: The Mediated Role of Health and Wellbeing THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED: NURTURING A MEDICAL JOURNAL'S QUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL INDEXATION AND IMPACT FACTOR Comparison of Slit Lamp Teaching Versus Bedside Teaching in Post Graduate Ophthalmology Residency at a Teaching Hospital Effective Application and Outcome of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Management of Complex Wounds with External Fixator Prevalence of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis and its Impact on Hand Grip Strength and Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1