Rh血型错配肝移植患者安全性的初步研究

Shao-hua Song, W. Yanling, Hao Liu, Junfeng Dong, Ke-Yan Sun, Jia-Yong Dong, F. Teng, Wen-Yuan Guo, Xiao-min Shi, Guoshan Ding
{"title":"Rh血型错配肝移植患者安全性的初步研究","authors":"Shao-hua Song, W. Yanling, Hao Liu, Junfeng Dong, Ke-Yan Sun, Jia-Yong Dong, F. Teng, Wen-Yuan Guo, Xiao-min Shi, Guoshan Ding","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the safety of liver transplantation recipients with Rh blood group mismatchming. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom May 2005 to December 2018, 1 546 cases of liver transplantation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among these cases, 5 cases of Rh blood group mismatched were Rh(-) recipients receiving Rh(+ ) donor liver. For each Rh blood group mismatched liver transplantation, 5 patients received the same Rh blood group liver allograft were matched according to a certain principle and were defined as Rh-mismatch group and Rh-match group respectively. The serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST)and creatinine(SCr)were compared between two groups at Days 7 & 14 post-operation. Serum total bilirubin(TB), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT)were compared between two groups at Month 1, 6 & 12 post-operation. Hemoglobin (Hb)were compared between two groups Month 1, 3 & 6 post-operation. The rates of infection, vascular complications and acute rejection was also compared. Indirect antiglobulin test (IAT)was used for detecting the production of anti-RhD antibody in patients in Rh-mismatch group at Month 1, 6 & 12 post-operation. \n \n \nResults \nAt the mentioned time, no significant inter-group difference existed in serum ALT, AST, SCr, TB, GGT and blood Hb levels(all P>0.05); Also, no significant difference existed in the incidence of infection, vascular complications or acute rejection(all P>0.05). In Rhmismatch group, 4 recipients received Rh(+ )RBC transfusion during perioperative period and no hemolytic anemia occurred after operation. Rh(D) antibody was negative at all timepoints. \n \n \nConclusions \nTaking into account the rarity of Rh-negative blood group in Chinese, it is safe and feasible to carry out Rh blood group mismatched liver transplantation when donor or recipient with the same Rh blood group is not available. \n \n \nKey words: \nRh blood group system; Mismatching; Liver transplantation; Safety; Recipient","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"44 1","pages":"553-557"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary study on the safety of liver transplantation recipients with Rh blood group mismatching\",\"authors\":\"Shao-hua Song, W. Yanling, Hao Liu, Junfeng Dong, Ke-Yan Sun, Jia-Yong Dong, F. Teng, Wen-Yuan Guo, Xiao-min Shi, Guoshan Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the safety of liver transplantation recipients with Rh blood group mismatchming. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom May 2005 to December 2018, 1 546 cases of liver transplantation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among these cases, 5 cases of Rh blood group mismatched were Rh(-) recipients receiving Rh(+ ) donor liver. For each Rh blood group mismatched liver transplantation, 5 patients received the same Rh blood group liver allograft were matched according to a certain principle and were defined as Rh-mismatch group and Rh-match group respectively. The serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST)and creatinine(SCr)were compared between two groups at Days 7 & 14 post-operation. Serum total bilirubin(TB), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT)were compared between two groups at Month 1, 6 & 12 post-operation. Hemoglobin (Hb)were compared between two groups Month 1, 3 & 6 post-operation. The rates of infection, vascular complications and acute rejection was also compared. Indirect antiglobulin test (IAT)was used for detecting the production of anti-RhD antibody in patients in Rh-mismatch group at Month 1, 6 & 12 post-operation. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAt the mentioned time, no significant inter-group difference existed in serum ALT, AST, SCr, TB, GGT and blood Hb levels(all P>0.05); Also, no significant difference existed in the incidence of infection, vascular complications or acute rejection(all P>0.05). In Rhmismatch group, 4 recipients received Rh(+ )RBC transfusion during perioperative period and no hemolytic anemia occurred after operation. Rh(D) antibody was negative at all timepoints. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nTaking into account the rarity of Rh-negative blood group in Chinese, it is safe and feasible to carry out Rh blood group mismatched liver transplantation when donor or recipient with the same Rh blood group is not available. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nRh blood group system; Mismatching; Liver transplantation; Safety; Recipient\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"553-557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.09.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨Rh血型错配肝移植的安全性。方法回顾性分析我院2005年5月至2018年12月收治的1 546例肝移植病例。其中Rh血型错配5例为Rh(-)受体接受Rh(+)供体肝脏。每进行一次Rh血型错配肝移植,将5例接受相同Rh血型异体肝移植的患者按照一定的原则进行匹配,分别定义为Rh血型错配组和Rh血型匹配组。比较两组患者术后第7、14天血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和肌酐(SCr)水平。比较两组患者术后第1、6、12个月血清总胆红素(TB)、γ -谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)水平。比较两组患者术后1、3、6个月血红蛋白(Hb)变化。比较两组的感染率、血管并发症和急性排斥反应的发生率。采用间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)检测rh错配组患者术后1、6、12个月抗rhd抗体的产生。结果两组患者同期血清ALT、AST、SCr、TB、GGT、Hb水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组间感染、血管并发症及急性排斥反应发生率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。Rhmismatch组围手术期输注Rh(+)红细胞4例,术后无溶血性贫血发生。Rh(D)抗体在所有时间点均为阴性。结论考虑到我国Rh阴性血型的稀缺性,在无相同Rh血型供体或受体的情况下,进行Rh血型错配肝移植是安全可行的。关键词:Rh血型系统;错配;肝移植;安全;收件人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preliminary study on the safety of liver transplantation recipients with Rh blood group mismatching
Objective To explore the safety of liver transplantation recipients with Rh blood group mismatchming. Methods From May 2005 to December 2018, 1 546 cases of liver transplantation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among these cases, 5 cases of Rh blood group mismatched were Rh(-) recipients receiving Rh(+ ) donor liver. For each Rh blood group mismatched liver transplantation, 5 patients received the same Rh blood group liver allograft were matched according to a certain principle and were defined as Rh-mismatch group and Rh-match group respectively. The serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST)and creatinine(SCr)were compared between two groups at Days 7 & 14 post-operation. Serum total bilirubin(TB), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT)were compared between two groups at Month 1, 6 & 12 post-operation. Hemoglobin (Hb)were compared between two groups Month 1, 3 & 6 post-operation. The rates of infection, vascular complications and acute rejection was also compared. Indirect antiglobulin test (IAT)was used for detecting the production of anti-RhD antibody in patients in Rh-mismatch group at Month 1, 6 & 12 post-operation. Results At the mentioned time, no significant inter-group difference existed in serum ALT, AST, SCr, TB, GGT and blood Hb levels(all P>0.05); Also, no significant difference existed in the incidence of infection, vascular complications or acute rejection(all P>0.05). In Rhmismatch group, 4 recipients received Rh(+ )RBC transfusion during perioperative period and no hemolytic anemia occurred after operation. Rh(D) antibody was negative at all timepoints. Conclusions Taking into account the rarity of Rh-negative blood group in Chinese, it is safe and feasible to carry out Rh blood group mismatched liver transplantation when donor or recipient with the same Rh blood group is not available. Key words: Rh blood group system; Mismatching; Liver transplantation; Safety; Recipient
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasonography to Biopsy, in Evaluation of Post-transplant Complications and Kidney Function Overview of global organ donation and transplantation in 2020 Development and prospect of clinical research on lung transplantation in post-COVID-19 era. Risk assessment of organ donation and procurement during COVID-19 epidemic Clinical analysis of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on one case with living-related kidney transplantation/ 中华器官移植杂志
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1