内蒙古自治区医用x线诊断患者入口表面剂量调查

Xiao Xu, Shuai Zhang, null Haribala, null Gerilemandahu
{"title":"内蒙古自治区医用x线诊断患者入口表面剂量调查","authors":"Xiao Xu, Shuai Zhang, null Haribala, null Gerilemandahu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the levels of entrance surface dose (ESD) to patients from diagnostic medical X-ray examinations in Inner Mongolia autonomous region. \n \n \nMethods \nThe investigation of diagnostic medical X-ray examinations was completed in 30% of the number of hospitals under the requirement of the program plan of the national survey on frequency and dose from medical exposure. The investigation of ESDs to patients from general diagnostic X-ray examinations was carried out in terms of the scale of annual outpatients in different levels of hospital. The difference in ESDs to patients was compared for different equipments, different grade hospitals and different exposure sites, with the comparison result being subjected to rank sum test. \n \n \nResults \nIn all types of diagnostic medical X-ray equipment, DR photography equipment accounted for the majority. During various routine diagnostic X-ray examinations, the average ESDs was lumbar vertebral 3.39 mGy, pelvic and hip 1.65 mGy, cervical spine 0.90 mGy, extremities 0.38 mGy and thorax 0.37 mGy, respectively. In the diagnostic examinations of chest, lumbar and cervical spine, the ESDs caused by the use of screen film photography equipment were higher than those by DR photography equipment, with statistically significant difference (Z=-3.229, -4.820, -5.265, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nScreen film photography equipment results in higher ESD than DR photography equipment. The doctor′s operation behavior is an important factor that affects the ESD. \n \n \nKey words: \nInner Mongolia region; Medical exposure; Diagnositc exposure; Entrance surface dose","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"49 1","pages":"946-950"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation on entrance surface doses to patients from medical X-ray diagnosis in Inner Mongolia autonomous region\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Xu, Shuai Zhang, null Haribala, null Gerilemandahu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.12.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo analyze the levels of entrance surface dose (ESD) to patients from diagnostic medical X-ray examinations in Inner Mongolia autonomous region. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe investigation of diagnostic medical X-ray examinations was completed in 30% of the number of hospitals under the requirement of the program plan of the national survey on frequency and dose from medical exposure. The investigation of ESDs to patients from general diagnostic X-ray examinations was carried out in terms of the scale of annual outpatients in different levels of hospital. The difference in ESDs to patients was compared for different equipments, different grade hospitals and different exposure sites, with the comparison result being subjected to rank sum test. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nIn all types of diagnostic medical X-ray equipment, DR photography equipment accounted for the majority. During various routine diagnostic X-ray examinations, the average ESDs was lumbar vertebral 3.39 mGy, pelvic and hip 1.65 mGy, cervical spine 0.90 mGy, extremities 0.38 mGy and thorax 0.37 mGy, respectively. In the diagnostic examinations of chest, lumbar and cervical spine, the ESDs caused by the use of screen film photography equipment were higher than those by DR photography equipment, with statistically significant difference (Z=-3.229, -4.820, -5.265, P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nScreen film photography equipment results in higher ESD than DR photography equipment. The doctor′s operation behavior is an important factor that affects the ESD. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nInner Mongolia region; Medical exposure; Diagnositc exposure; Entrance surface dose\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"946-950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.12.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.12.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析内蒙古地区医学诊断x线检查患者的入口表面剂量(ESD)水平。方法按照全国医疗照射频率和剂量调查方案的要求,在30%的医院完成诊断性医学x线检查调查。以不同级别医院每年门诊患者的规模,对普通诊断x线检查患者产生的静电放电进行调查。比较不同设备、不同等级医院、不同暴露场所对患者产生的静电放电的差异,比较结果采用秩和检验。结果在各类医用x线诊断设备中,DR摄影设备占多数。在各种常规诊断x线检查中,平均电磁辐射强度分别为腰椎3.39 mGy、骨盆和髋关节1.65 mGy、颈椎0.90 mGy、四肢0.38 mGy、胸部0.37 mGy。在胸部、腰椎和颈椎的诊断检查中,使用屏膜摄影设备引起的esd高于使用DR摄影设备,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.229, -4.820, -5.265, P<0.05)。结论屏膜摄影设备的ESD高于DR摄影设备。医生的手术行为是影响ESD的重要因素。关键词:内蒙古地区;医疗风险;诊断暴露;入口表面剂量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation on entrance surface doses to patients from medical X-ray diagnosis in Inner Mongolia autonomous region
Objective To analyze the levels of entrance surface dose (ESD) to patients from diagnostic medical X-ray examinations in Inner Mongolia autonomous region. Methods The investigation of diagnostic medical X-ray examinations was completed in 30% of the number of hospitals under the requirement of the program plan of the national survey on frequency and dose from medical exposure. The investigation of ESDs to patients from general diagnostic X-ray examinations was carried out in terms of the scale of annual outpatients in different levels of hospital. The difference in ESDs to patients was compared for different equipments, different grade hospitals and different exposure sites, with the comparison result being subjected to rank sum test. Results In all types of diagnostic medical X-ray equipment, DR photography equipment accounted for the majority. During various routine diagnostic X-ray examinations, the average ESDs was lumbar vertebral 3.39 mGy, pelvic and hip 1.65 mGy, cervical spine 0.90 mGy, extremities 0.38 mGy and thorax 0.37 mGy, respectively. In the diagnostic examinations of chest, lumbar and cervical spine, the ESDs caused by the use of screen film photography equipment were higher than those by DR photography equipment, with statistically significant difference (Z=-3.229, -4.820, -5.265, P<0.05). Conclusions Screen film photography equipment results in higher ESD than DR photography equipment. The doctor′s operation behavior is an important factor that affects the ESD. Key words: Inner Mongolia region; Medical exposure; Diagnositc exposure; Entrance surface dose
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华放射医学与防护杂志
中华放射医学与防护杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6377
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Infection control status of novel coronavirus pneumonia and radiation safety at CT workplace Current status of the application of radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy resources in Huai'an City in 2020 The application value of low-dose CT scan in pregnant women with COVID-19 Eeffects of tube voltage on image quality and radiation dose of paranasal sinus CT examination Analyzing quality of life and influencing factors in patients with bone metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after radiotherapy by bone pain scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1