{"title":"标准的数学基础","authors":"K. Krechmer","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standards are fundamental to any rigorous form of communications and are used in every civilization. Given that mathematics provides a rigorous way to understand very basic phenomena, this paper explores the mathematical basis of standards. Five successions of standards are identified from pre-history to the present and mathematical models of each are presented. These mathematical models more rigorously define the standards successions proposed. The impact of these standard successions on existing standardization issues is examined. he ubiquity of technical standards in all human societies argues for a rigorous understanding - why are standards necessary? At SIIT 2001, Krechmer (2001) proposed to answer this question using set theory and information theory. The current paper builds on that paper. It develops a philosophical basis for technical standards, models the mathematical relationship between standards and entropy, and identifies five successions of standards. The term \"standard\" often refers to published documents or the output of specific standardization committees. This is an application view of standards. This paper focuses on a conceptual view of standards. A standard is defined as: A codification for a society of the constraints used for one or more comparisons between implementations. This definition is taken from Krechmer, 2005 which discusses prior definitions of standards and the rational behind this definition. Standardization is the term used to refer to the application of creating, implementing or using a standard. This paper concludes by using the new conceptual models of standards to better comprehend the impact of standardization on society and technology.","PeriodicalId":22233,"journal":{"name":"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mathematical basis of standards\",\"authors\":\"K. Krechmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standards are fundamental to any rigorous form of communications and are used in every civilization. Given that mathematics provides a rigorous way to understand very basic phenomena, this paper explores the mathematical basis of standards. Five successions of standards are identified from pre-history to the present and mathematical models of each are presented. These mathematical models more rigorously define the standards successions proposed. The impact of these standard successions on existing standardization issues is examined. he ubiquity of technical standards in all human societies argues for a rigorous understanding - why are standards necessary? At SIIT 2001, Krechmer (2001) proposed to answer this question using set theory and information theory. The current paper builds on that paper. It develops a philosophical basis for technical standards, models the mathematical relationship between standards and entropy, and identifies five successions of standards. The term \\\"standard\\\" often refers to published documents or the output of specific standardization committees. This is an application view of standards. This paper focuses on a conceptual view of standards. A standard is defined as: A codification for a society of the constraints used for one or more comparisons between implementations. This definition is taken from Krechmer, 2005 which discusses prior definitions of standards and the rational behind this definition. Standardization is the term used to refer to the application of creating, implementing or using a standard. This paper concludes by using the new conceptual models of standards to better comprehend the impact of standardization on society and technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

标准是任何严格形式的交流的基础,在每一种文明中都有使用。鉴于数学提供了一种严谨的方式来理解非常基本的现象,本文探讨了标准的数学基础。从史前到现在,确定了五个标准序列,并提出了每个标准的数学模型。这些数学模型更严格地定义了所提出的标准序列。研究了这些标准继承对现有标准化问题的影响。技术标准在所有人类社会中无处不在,这就要求我们有一个严格的理解——为什么标准是必要的?在SIIT 2001, Krechmer(2001)提出用集合论和信息论来回答这个问题。当前的论文建立在那篇论文的基础上。它发展了技术标准的哲学基础,建立了标准和熵之间的数学关系模型,并确定了五种标准序列。术语“标准”通常指出版的文件或特定标准化委员会的输出。这是标准的应用程序视图。本文着重于标准的概念观点。标准被定义为:用于实现之间的一个或多个比较的约束集合的编码。这个定义来自Krechmer, 2005,讨论了之前的标准定义和这个定义背后的理性。标准化是指创建、实现或使用标准的应用程序的术语。本文最后通过使用新的标准概念模型来更好地理解标准化对社会和技术的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The mathematical basis of standards
Standards are fundamental to any rigorous form of communications and are used in every civilization. Given that mathematics provides a rigorous way to understand very basic phenomena, this paper explores the mathematical basis of standards. Five successions of standards are identified from pre-history to the present and mathematical models of each are presented. These mathematical models more rigorously define the standards successions proposed. The impact of these standard successions on existing standardization issues is examined. he ubiquity of technical standards in all human societies argues for a rigorous understanding - why are standards necessary? At SIIT 2001, Krechmer (2001) proposed to answer this question using set theory and information theory. The current paper builds on that paper. It develops a philosophical basis for technical standards, models the mathematical relationship between standards and entropy, and identifies five successions of standards. The term "standard" often refers to published documents or the output of specific standardization committees. This is an application view of standards. This paper focuses on a conceptual view of standards. A standard is defined as: A codification for a society of the constraints used for one or more comparisons between implementations. This definition is taken from Krechmer, 2005 which discusses prior definitions of standards and the rational behind this definition. Standardization is the term used to refer to the application of creating, implementing or using a standard. This paper concludes by using the new conceptual models of standards to better comprehend the impact of standardization on society and technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A prototype to analyze and support standardization decisions On the effects of IS company standards on business process performance Standards of quality and quality of standards for telecommunications and information technologies US and EU regulatory competition in ICT standardization law & policy Scale of standards dynamics in JTC1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1