为世贸组织辩护:为什么我们需要一个多边贸易体制?

Weihuan Zhou
{"title":"为世贸组织辩护:为什么我们需要一个多边贸易体制?","authors":"Weihuan Zhou","doi":"10.54648/leie2020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For more than seven decades, the multilateral trading system has played an essential role in promoting international cooperation on trade policymaking and dispute resolution. As theWTOis being pushed toward the verge of irrelevance, it falls upon us, who believe in the utility of the WTO and multilateralism in general, to defend its legitimacy and significance. Taking theoretical and doctrinal approaches as well as case studies, this article expounds on the fundamental function of the system as being to discipline the use of protectionist policy instruments for trade or non-trade objectives and draws on the significance of the Theory of Distortions and Welfare in providing powerful economic guidance for how the system may operate to achieve a proper balance between the regulation of protectionist instruments and the preservation of policy space. Furthermore, this article shows how the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism, particularly the Appellate Body, has served the underlying function of the system by contributing to disincentivizing governments from responding to protectionist demands of special interest groups but leaving sufficient latitude of discretion for governments to accommodate nontrade interests. This article cautions that if theWTOdoes collapse and potential adverse economic and political ramifications materialize, then the political need for international trade cooperation and rulesbased dispute resolution will quickly return. By then, the best way to address that need in pursuit of long-term peace and prosperity would be to rebuild a multilateral trading system.\nWTO, Trade War, Protectionism, Multilateral trading system, Non-trade values, Dispute Settlement, Appellate Body, Economic efficiency.","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Defence of the WTO: Why Do We Need a Multilateral Trading System?\",\"authors\":\"Weihuan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/leie2020002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For more than seven decades, the multilateral trading system has played an essential role in promoting international cooperation on trade policymaking and dispute resolution. As theWTOis being pushed toward the verge of irrelevance, it falls upon us, who believe in the utility of the WTO and multilateralism in general, to defend its legitimacy and significance. Taking theoretical and doctrinal approaches as well as case studies, this article expounds on the fundamental function of the system as being to discipline the use of protectionist policy instruments for trade or non-trade objectives and draws on the significance of the Theory of Distortions and Welfare in providing powerful economic guidance for how the system may operate to achieve a proper balance between the regulation of protectionist instruments and the preservation of policy space. Furthermore, this article shows how the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism, particularly the Appellate Body, has served the underlying function of the system by contributing to disincentivizing governments from responding to protectionist demands of special interest groups but leaving sufficient latitude of discretion for governments to accommodate nontrade interests. This article cautions that if theWTOdoes collapse and potential adverse economic and political ramifications materialize, then the political need for international trade cooperation and rulesbased dispute resolution will quickly return. By then, the best way to address that need in pursuit of long-term peace and prosperity would be to rebuild a multilateral trading system.\\nWTO, Trade War, Protectionism, Multilateral trading system, Non-trade values, Dispute Settlement, Appellate Body, Economic efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Issues of Economic Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2020002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

70多年来,多边贸易体制为促进国际贸易政策制定和争端解决合作发挥了重要作用。随着世贸组织被推向无关紧要的边缘,我们相信世贸组织和多边主义的效用,有责任捍卫其合法性和重要性。本文采用理论和理论方法以及案例研究,阐述了该制度的基本功能,即约束为实现贸易或非贸易目标而使用保护主义政策工具的行为,并借鉴了扭曲和福利理论的重要性,为该制度如何运作提供了强有力的经济指导,以实现对保护主义工具的监管和政策空间的维护之间的适当平衡。此外,本文还展示了世贸组织的争端解决机制,特别是上诉机构,如何通过抑制政府对特殊利益集团的保护主义要求作出反应,同时为政府提供足够的自由裁量权来适应非贸易利益,从而发挥了该体系的基本功能。本文警告说,如果世贸组织崩溃,潜在的不利经济和政治后果成为现实,那么对国际贸易合作和基于规则的争端解决的政治需求将很快恢复。到那时,解决这一需求、追求长期和平与繁荣的最佳方式将是重建多边贸易体系。WTO,贸易战,保护主义,多边贸易体制,非贸易价值,争端解决,上诉机构,经济效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Defence of the WTO: Why Do We Need a Multilateral Trading System?
For more than seven decades, the multilateral trading system has played an essential role in promoting international cooperation on trade policymaking and dispute resolution. As theWTOis being pushed toward the verge of irrelevance, it falls upon us, who believe in the utility of the WTO and multilateralism in general, to defend its legitimacy and significance. Taking theoretical and doctrinal approaches as well as case studies, this article expounds on the fundamental function of the system as being to discipline the use of protectionist policy instruments for trade or non-trade objectives and draws on the significance of the Theory of Distortions and Welfare in providing powerful economic guidance for how the system may operate to achieve a proper balance between the regulation of protectionist instruments and the preservation of policy space. Furthermore, this article shows how the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism, particularly the Appellate Body, has served the underlying function of the system by contributing to disincentivizing governments from responding to protectionist demands of special interest groups but leaving sufficient latitude of discretion for governments to accommodate nontrade interests. This article cautions that if theWTOdoes collapse and potential adverse economic and political ramifications materialize, then the political need for international trade cooperation and rulesbased dispute resolution will quickly return. By then, the best way to address that need in pursuit of long-term peace and prosperity would be to rebuild a multilateral trading system. WTO, Trade War, Protectionism, Multilateral trading system, Non-trade values, Dispute Settlement, Appellate Body, Economic efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1