大学教育领域的多标准评价方法:在能源市场课程中的应用

M. Alcázar-Ortega, Lina Montuori, J. Rodríguez-García, Carlos Vargas-Salgado
{"title":"大学教育领域的多标准评价方法:在能源市场课程中的应用","authors":"M. Alcázar-Ortega, Lina Montuori, J. Rodríguez-García, Carlos Vargas-Salgado","doi":"10.3390/knowledge3010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bologna Plan adopted by European universities ended the hegemony of an evaluation system exclusively based on the performance of traditional examinations. In this area, with a view to revitalizing grading models in university education, a wide range of evaluation mechanisms has been developed in recent years. Using them, teachers may evaluate the learning levels of their students, including both the specific competences of the taught subject and the transversal competences that help students further develop their professional careers. This article presents a methodology based on a multi-criteria procedure through which students could be evaluated from different points of view, based on different types of evaluation mechanisms that are diversely weighted. Therefore, their levels of learning could be assessed more objectively. This article shows a practical case of applying this methodology, which has been used for the last five years in a course on energy markets taught as part of the Degree in Energy Engineering at the UPV.","PeriodicalId":74770,"journal":{"name":"Science of aging knowledge environment : SAGE KE","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method in the Field of University Education: Application to a Course on Energy Markets\",\"authors\":\"M. Alcázar-Ortega, Lina Montuori, J. Rodríguez-García, Carlos Vargas-Salgado\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/knowledge3010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Bologna Plan adopted by European universities ended the hegemony of an evaluation system exclusively based on the performance of traditional examinations. In this area, with a view to revitalizing grading models in university education, a wide range of evaluation mechanisms has been developed in recent years. Using them, teachers may evaluate the learning levels of their students, including both the specific competences of the taught subject and the transversal competences that help students further develop their professional careers. This article presents a methodology based on a multi-criteria procedure through which students could be evaluated from different points of view, based on different types of evaluation mechanisms that are diversely weighted. Therefore, their levels of learning could be assessed more objectively. This article shows a practical case of applying this methodology, which has been used for the last five years in a course on energy markets taught as part of the Degree in Energy Engineering at the UPV.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of aging knowledge environment : SAGE KE\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of aging knowledge environment : SAGE KE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of aging knowledge environment : SAGE KE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧洲大学采用的博洛尼亚计划结束了完全以传统考试成绩为基础的评价体系的霸权。在这方面,为了重振大学教育的评分模式,近年来发展了各种各样的评估机制。教师可以利用这些测试来评估学生的学习水平,包括所教学科的特定能力和帮助学生进一步发展职业生涯的横向能力。本文提出了一种基于多标准程序的方法,通过该方法,学生可以从不同的角度进行评估,基于不同权重的不同类型的评估机制。因此,可以更客观地评估他们的学习水平。本文展示了应用该方法的一个实际案例,该方法已在过去五年中用于UPV能源工程学位的能源市场课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method in the Field of University Education: Application to a Course on Energy Markets
The Bologna Plan adopted by European universities ended the hegemony of an evaluation system exclusively based on the performance of traditional examinations. In this area, with a view to revitalizing grading models in university education, a wide range of evaluation mechanisms has been developed in recent years. Using them, teachers may evaluate the learning levels of their students, including both the specific competences of the taught subject and the transversal competences that help students further develop their professional careers. This article presents a methodology based on a multi-criteria procedure through which students could be evaluated from different points of view, based on different types of evaluation mechanisms that are diversely weighted. Therefore, their levels of learning could be assessed more objectively. This article shows a practical case of applying this methodology, which has been used for the last five years in a course on energy markets taught as part of the Degree in Energy Engineering at the UPV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cognitive Factors Affecting the Manufacturing Optimization Skills of Rural Indian BPO Workers Enhancing Landfill Monitoring and Assessment: A Proposal Combining GIS-Based Analytic Hierarchy Processes and Fuzzy Artificial Intelligence Embedding Sustainability Justice in Greek Secondary Curricula through the DeCoRe Plus Methodology KRITERIA PEMILIHAN PASANGAN HIDUP DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KELUARGA HARMONIS EFEKTIFITAS PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH DENGAN PENDEKATAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DESA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1