他们又来了:借用意指

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10511431.2019.1708602
Ryan Neville-Shepard, Skye de Saint Felix
{"title":"他们又来了:借用意指","authors":"Ryan Neville-Shepard, Skye de Saint Felix","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2019.1708602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Tracking all mentions of Ronald Reagan during presidential primary and general election debates from 1988 to 2016, we suggest that < Reagan > has emerged as a complex ideograph in contemporary political discourse. Demonstrating what we call the “personified ideograph,” this essay tracks the reverence toward Reagan that indicates the name’s status as a god term, and suggests the historic meaning of the ideograph is linked to secondary terms like “principled,” “peace through strength,” and “prosperity.” We further contend that such a calcified memory of Reagan has led to a schism in the GOP, and we describe the alternative understanding of < Reagan > as linked to such terms as “bipartisanship” and “change.”","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":"48 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"There they go again: invoking the < Reagan > ideograph\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Neville-Shepard, Skye de Saint Felix\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10511431.2019.1708602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Tracking all mentions of Ronald Reagan during presidential primary and general election debates from 1988 to 2016, we suggest that < Reagan > has emerged as a complex ideograph in contemporary political discourse. Demonstrating what we call the “personified ideograph,” this essay tracks the reverence toward Reagan that indicates the name’s status as a god term, and suggests the historic meaning of the ideograph is linked to secondary terms like “principled,” “peace through strength,” and “prosperity.” We further contend that such a calcified memory of Reagan has led to a schism in the GOP, and we describe the alternative understanding of < Reagan > as linked to such terms as “bipartisanship” and “change.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":29934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumentation and Advocacy\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumentation and Advocacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2019.1708602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2019.1708602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对1988年至2016年总统初选和大选辩论中所有提及罗纳德·里根的情况进行追踪,我们认为,在当代政治话语中,里根已成为一个复杂的意指概念。这篇文章展示了我们所说的“人格化的意指”,它追踪了人们对里根的崇敬,这表明了这个名字作为一个神的词的地位,并表明这个意指的历史意义与“有原则的”、“通过力量实现和平”和“繁荣”等次要术语有关。我们进一步认为,这种对里根的钙化记忆导致了共和党的分裂,我们描述了与“两党合作”和“变革”等术语相关的另一种理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
There they go again: invoking the < Reagan > ideograph
Abstract Tracking all mentions of Ronald Reagan during presidential primary and general election debates from 1988 to 2016, we suggest that < Reagan > has emerged as a complex ideograph in contemporary political discourse. Demonstrating what we call the “personified ideograph,” this essay tracks the reverence toward Reagan that indicates the name’s status as a god term, and suggests the historic meaning of the ideograph is linked to secondary terms like “principled,” “peace through strength,” and “prosperity.” We further contend that such a calcified memory of Reagan has led to a schism in the GOP, and we describe the alternative understanding of < Reagan > as linked to such terms as “bipartisanship” and “change.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Can high school competitive debating facilitate political participation? The role of political knowledge and identification with a politically active group Nonverbal communication as argumentation: the case of political television debates The unnerved and unhoused: a rhetorical analysis of save Austin now’s campaign to disband unhoused individuals from Austin, Texas “Where were you shot?”: analyzing location rhetoric as strategic maneuvering in contemporary gun-control discourse Effective argumentation for action in health policy: a case study of the UK’s review on antimicrobial resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1