R. Newsom, D. Ligon, R. Calhoun, R. Heap, Edward G. Cregan, M. Princevac
{"title":"利用单、双多普勒激光雷达数据反演微尺度风场和温度场","authors":"R. Newsom, D. Ligon, R. Calhoun, R. Heap, Edward G. Cregan, M. Princevac","doi":"10.1175/JAM2280.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dual-Doppler lidar observations are used to assess the accuracy of single-Doppler retrievals of microscale wind and temperature fields in a shear-driven convective boundary layer. The retrieval algorithm, which is based on four-dimensional variational data assimilation, is applied by using dual- and single-Doppler lidar data that are acquired during the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment. The velocity field that was retrieved using single-Doppler data is compared directly with radial velocities that were measured by a second noncollocated lidar. Dual-Doppler retrievals are also performed and then compared with the singleDoppler retrieval. The linear correlation coefficient and rms deviation between the single-Doppler retrieval and the observations from the second lidar are found to be 0.94 and 1.2 m s 1 , respectively. The high correlation is mainly the result of good agreement in the mean vertical structure as observed by the two lidars. Comparisons between the single- and dual-Doppler retrieval indicate that the single-Doppler retrieval underestimates the magnitude of fluctuations in the crossbeam direction. Vertical profiles of horizontally averaged correlations between the single- and dual-Doppler retrievals also show a marginal correlation (0.4–0.8) between one of the horizontal velocity components. Again, this suggests that the retrieval algorithm has difficulty estimating the crossbeam component from single-Doppler data.","PeriodicalId":15026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology","volume":"76 1","pages":"1324-1345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrieval of Microscale Wind and Temperature Fields from Single- and Dual-Doppler Lidar Data\",\"authors\":\"R. Newsom, D. Ligon, R. Calhoun, R. Heap, Edward G. Cregan, M. Princevac\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/JAM2280.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dual-Doppler lidar observations are used to assess the accuracy of single-Doppler retrievals of microscale wind and temperature fields in a shear-driven convective boundary layer. The retrieval algorithm, which is based on four-dimensional variational data assimilation, is applied by using dual- and single-Doppler lidar data that are acquired during the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment. The velocity field that was retrieved using single-Doppler data is compared directly with radial velocities that were measured by a second noncollocated lidar. Dual-Doppler retrievals are also performed and then compared with the singleDoppler retrieval. The linear correlation coefficient and rms deviation between the single-Doppler retrieval and the observations from the second lidar are found to be 0.94 and 1.2 m s 1 , respectively. The high correlation is mainly the result of good agreement in the mean vertical structure as observed by the two lidars. Comparisons between the single- and dual-Doppler retrieval indicate that the single-Doppler retrieval underestimates the magnitude of fluctuations in the crossbeam direction. Vertical profiles of horizontally averaged correlations between the single- and dual-Doppler retrievals also show a marginal correlation (0.4–0.8) between one of the horizontal velocity components. Again, this suggests that the retrieval algorithm has difficulty estimating the crossbeam component from single-Doppler data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"1324-1345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2280.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2280.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66
摘要
利用双多普勒激光雷达观测资料,评估了单多普勒反演切变对流边界层微尺度风场和温度场的精度。基于四维变分数据同化的检索算法,以联合城市2003野外试验中获取的双多普勒和单多普勒激光雷达数据为例进行了应用。使用单多普勒数据获取的速度场直接与另一个非配置激光雷达测量的径向速度进行比较。还进行了双多普勒检索,然后与单多普勒检索进行了比较。单多普勒反演结果与第二激光雷达观测值的线性相关系数和均方根偏差分别为0.94和1.2 ms 1。高相关性主要是由于两个激光雷达观测到的平均垂直结构非常一致。单多普勒反演与双多普勒反演的比较表明,单多普勒反演低估了波束方向的波动幅度。单和双多普勒反演的水平平均相关性的垂直剖面也显示其中一个水平速度分量之间的边际相关性(0.4-0.8)。这再次表明,检索算法难以从单多普勒数据估计横梁分量。
Retrieval of Microscale Wind and Temperature Fields from Single- and Dual-Doppler Lidar Data
Dual-Doppler lidar observations are used to assess the accuracy of single-Doppler retrievals of microscale wind and temperature fields in a shear-driven convective boundary layer. The retrieval algorithm, which is based on four-dimensional variational data assimilation, is applied by using dual- and single-Doppler lidar data that are acquired during the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment. The velocity field that was retrieved using single-Doppler data is compared directly with radial velocities that were measured by a second noncollocated lidar. Dual-Doppler retrievals are also performed and then compared with the singleDoppler retrieval. The linear correlation coefficient and rms deviation between the single-Doppler retrieval and the observations from the second lidar are found to be 0.94 and 1.2 m s 1 , respectively. The high correlation is mainly the result of good agreement in the mean vertical structure as observed by the two lidars. Comparisons between the single- and dual-Doppler retrieval indicate that the single-Doppler retrieval underestimates the magnitude of fluctuations in the crossbeam direction. Vertical profiles of horizontally averaged correlations between the single- and dual-Doppler retrievals also show a marginal correlation (0.4–0.8) between one of the horizontal velocity components. Again, this suggests that the retrieval algorithm has difficulty estimating the crossbeam component from single-Doppler data.