三一和剑桥语言证书口语评价标准的比较研究

Q3 Arts and Humanities Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/ausp-2022-0015
Lucia Fraga-Viñas, M. Bobadilla-Pérez
{"title":"三一和剑桥语言证书口语评价标准的比较研究","authors":"Lucia Fraga-Viñas, M. Bobadilla-Pérez","doi":"10.2478/ausp-2022-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The European Council has been instrumental in the standardization of language competence levels and certifications with the guidelines provided in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) published in 2001 and later reviewed in 2020 with the Companion Volume with New Descriptors (CEFRCV). Cambridge Assessment English and Trinity College are two of the highest regarded institutions at the international level that grant their language certificates following the language competence levels provided by the CEFR. For this reason, the current study is grounded on the conviction that those certificates should meet certain principles of the Framework as a form of guarantee that they are assessing the CEFR level correctly. In particular, this paper focuses on the speaking skill and the rubrics of assessment used by the two aforementioned institutions. The rubrics of Trinity and Cambridge for the assessment of the oral production at the B2 CEFR level were considered for the purposes of this study – in particular, the rubrics that assess the oral production in the Integrated Skills in English (ISE-II) exam and in the First Certificate in English (B2 First). With a qualitative document research approach, this study analyses these rubrics in order to determine to what extent they respect the criteria established by the CEFR.","PeriodicalId":37574,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Speaking Assessment Rubrics in Trinity and Cambridge Language Certificates\",\"authors\":\"Lucia Fraga-Viñas, M. Bobadilla-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ausp-2022-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The European Council has been instrumental in the standardization of language competence levels and certifications with the guidelines provided in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) published in 2001 and later reviewed in 2020 with the Companion Volume with New Descriptors (CEFRCV). Cambridge Assessment English and Trinity College are two of the highest regarded institutions at the international level that grant their language certificates following the language competence levels provided by the CEFR. For this reason, the current study is grounded on the conviction that those certificates should meet certain principles of the Framework as a form of guarantee that they are assessing the CEFR level correctly. In particular, this paper focuses on the speaking skill and the rubrics of assessment used by the two aforementioned institutions. The rubrics of Trinity and Cambridge for the assessment of the oral production at the B2 CEFR level were considered for the purposes of this study – in particular, the rubrics that assess the oral production in the Integrated Skills in English (ISE-II) exam and in the First Certificate in English (B2 First). With a qualitative document research approach, this study analyses these rubrics in order to determine to what extent they respect the criteria established by the CEFR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲理事会在语言能力水平和认证的标准化方面发挥了重要作用,2001年出版的《欧洲共同语言参考框架》(CEFR)提供了指导方针,随后在2020年通过《新描述符配套卷》(CEFRCV)进行了审查。剑桥评估英语和三一学院是国际上最受尊敬的两个机构,根据CEFR提供的语言能力水平授予语言证书。因此,目前的研究是基于这样一种信念,即这些证书应符合《框架》的某些原则,作为它们正确评估CEFR水平的一种保证形式。本文特别关注上述两所院校的口语技能和评估标准。为了本研究的目的,我们考虑了三一学院和剑桥大学用于评估B2 CEFR水平口语表达能力的标准,特别是评估英语综合技能(ISE-II)考试和英语第一证书(B2 First)口语表达能力的标准。采用定性文献研究方法,本研究分析了这些规则,以确定它们在多大程度上尊重CEFR建立的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on Speaking Assessment Rubrics in Trinity and Cambridge Language Certificates
Abstract The European Council has been instrumental in the standardization of language competence levels and certifications with the guidelines provided in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) published in 2001 and later reviewed in 2020 with the Companion Volume with New Descriptors (CEFRCV). Cambridge Assessment English and Trinity College are two of the highest regarded institutions at the international level that grant their language certificates following the language competence levels provided by the CEFR. For this reason, the current study is grounded on the conviction that those certificates should meet certain principles of the Framework as a form of guarantee that they are assessing the CEFR level correctly. In particular, this paper focuses on the speaking skill and the rubrics of assessment used by the two aforementioned institutions. The rubrics of Trinity and Cambridge for the assessment of the oral production at the B2 CEFR level were considered for the purposes of this study – in particular, the rubrics that assess the oral production in the Integrated Skills in English (ISE-II) exam and in the First Certificate in English (B2 First). With a qualitative document research approach, this study analyses these rubrics in order to determine to what extent they respect the criteria established by the CEFR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Series Philologica is published in cooperation with Sciendo by De Gruyter. Series Philologica publishes original, previously unpublished articles in the wide field of philological studies, and it is published in 3 issues a year (since 2014). The printed and online version of papers are identical.
期刊最新文献
Diasporic Imagination and Chronotopes Social Implications of Borrowings How Culture-Specific Practices and Values May Influence International (Romanian–South Korean) Marriages Political Discourse and Oppression – Influences on the Mentality and Culture of the Soviet Man Between Two Worlds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1