从罕见事件中学习的噪声信号

D. Maslach, O. Branzei, Claus Rerup, Mark J. Zbaracki
{"title":"从罕见事件中学习的噪声信号","authors":"D. Maslach, O. Branzei, Claus Rerup, Mark J. Zbaracki","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms increasingly have access to information about the failure events of other firms through public repositories. We study one such repository that accumulates reports of adverse events in the medical device industry. We provide qualitative evidence that shows how firms select a sample of adverse events and then engage in inferential learning. We show that firms use the reports of others to extract new valid knowledge from the adverse events in other firms. We use quantitative evidence to explore how a public repository can be used to provide more direct evidence of vicarious learning. Our findings challenge some standard assumptions about vicarious learning. First, we show that the learning in a repository does not come from referent others. Instead, it emerges directly from failure events that might ordinarily be dismissed as noise. Second, we show that the learning does not come from copying others. Instead, it is constructed by firm members as they assemble individual failure events to identify possi...","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"111 1","pages":"225-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noise as Signal in Learning from Rare Events\",\"authors\":\"D. Maslach, O. Branzei, Claus Rerup, Mark J. Zbaracki\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/orsc.2017.1179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firms increasingly have access to information about the failure events of other firms through public repositories. We study one such repository that accumulates reports of adverse events in the medical device industry. We provide qualitative evidence that shows how firms select a sample of adverse events and then engage in inferential learning. We show that firms use the reports of others to extract new valid knowledge from the adverse events in other firms. We use quantitative evidence to explore how a public repository can be used to provide more direct evidence of vicarious learning. Our findings challenge some standard assumptions about vicarious learning. First, we show that the learning in a repository does not come from referent others. Instead, it emerges directly from failure events that might ordinarily be dismissed as noise. Second, we show that the learning does not come from copying others. Instead, it is constructed by firm members as they assemble individual failure events to identify possi...\",\"PeriodicalId\":93599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"225-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

企业越来越多地可以通过公共存储库访问有关其他企业失败事件的信息。我们研究了一个这样的存储库,它积累了医疗器械行业不良事件的报告。我们提供定性证据,表明公司如何选择不良事件样本,然后进行推理学习。我们表明,企业利用他人的报告,从其他企业的不良事件中提取新的有效知识。我们使用定量证据来探索如何使用公共存储库来提供替代学习的更直接证据。我们的发现挑战了一些关于替代学习的标准假设。首先,我们展示了存储库中的学习不是来自其他参考对象。相反,它直接出现在通常可能被视为噪音的失败事件中。其次,我们表明学习不是来自模仿他人。相反,它是由公司成员在汇总单个失败事件以识别可能的失败事件时构建的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noise as Signal in Learning from Rare Events
Firms increasingly have access to information about the failure events of other firms through public repositories. We study one such repository that accumulates reports of adverse events in the medical device industry. We provide qualitative evidence that shows how firms select a sample of adverse events and then engage in inferential learning. We show that firms use the reports of others to extract new valid knowledge from the adverse events in other firms. We use quantitative evidence to explore how a public repository can be used to provide more direct evidence of vicarious learning. Our findings challenge some standard assumptions about vicarious learning. First, we show that the learning in a repository does not come from referent others. Instead, it emerges directly from failure events that might ordinarily be dismissed as noise. Second, we show that the learning does not come from copying others. Instead, it is constructed by firm members as they assemble individual failure events to identify possi...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees' Problem Solving Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory The Lasting Benefits of Teams: Tie Vitality After Teams Disband Falling Not Far from the Tree: Entrepreneurs and Organizational Heritage Blurred Lines: How the Collectivism Norm Operates Through Perceived Group Diversity to Boost or Harm Group Performance in Himalayan Mountain Climbing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1