研究基因-营养相互作用的方法学方面。

C. Bonaïti‐pellié
{"title":"研究基因-营养相互作用的方法学方面。","authors":"C. Bonaïti‐pellié","doi":"10.1097/00008469-200202000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most diseases arise through the joint action of genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors. This is particularly true for cancers in which both types of factors have already been identified or strongly suspected. There may, however, be other as yet unidentified factors. Recent advances in molecular genetics will make it easier to study the gene– environment interactions in these diseases. Synergism (i.e. assessment of whether the effect of the genotype on risk is modified by the exposure level or whether the effect of exposure on risk is modified by the genotype) has important scientific and public health implications. Indeed, it could help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these interactions and to evaluate the risks for individuals. The definition of interaction is dependent on a model and on how the effects are measured. When the effects are measured in terms of relative risks of disease, which is usually the case, interaction means that the joint effects of genetic and environmental factors cannot simply be multiplied. There are a number of potential situations: (1) a genetic factor and an environmental factor have already been evidenced and the aim is to specify their joint effect; (2) some genetic and environmental factors are only suspected of playing a role in the aetiology of the disease and some kind of interaction is thought to be hiding the main effects, which could be overcome by taking it into account; and (3) oblivious to potential causes, a search is made for a large number of factors in the hope of being lucky enough to find something. In the case of gene–nutrient interactions, all these situations are applicable. Although some genetic factors (Bonaı̈ti-Pellié, 1999; Olschwang, 1999) and the role of some nutritional factors (Franceschi, 1999; Giacosa et al., 1999) have already been identified, several uncertainties remain and there are numerous inconsistencies across studies on possible interactions between these factors (Little and Faivre, 1999). The objective of this paper is to review some available methods for evidencing genetic factors and assessing gene–environment interactions, to compare their respective advantages and limitations, and to consider the possible applications to the study of gene–nutrient interactions in colorectal cancer.","PeriodicalId":11950,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological aspects of investigating gene-nutrient interactions.\",\"authors\":\"C. Bonaïti‐pellié\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00008469-200202000-00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most diseases arise through the joint action of genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors. This is particularly true for cancers in which both types of factors have already been identified or strongly suspected. There may, however, be other as yet unidentified factors. Recent advances in molecular genetics will make it easier to study the gene– environment interactions in these diseases. Synergism (i.e. assessment of whether the effect of the genotype on risk is modified by the exposure level or whether the effect of exposure on risk is modified by the genotype) has important scientific and public health implications. Indeed, it could help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these interactions and to evaluate the risks for individuals. The definition of interaction is dependent on a model and on how the effects are measured. When the effects are measured in terms of relative risks of disease, which is usually the case, interaction means that the joint effects of genetic and environmental factors cannot simply be multiplied. There are a number of potential situations: (1) a genetic factor and an environmental factor have already been evidenced and the aim is to specify their joint effect; (2) some genetic and environmental factors are only suspected of playing a role in the aetiology of the disease and some kind of interaction is thought to be hiding the main effects, which could be overcome by taking it into account; and (3) oblivious to potential causes, a search is made for a large number of factors in the hope of being lucky enough to find something. In the case of gene–nutrient interactions, all these situations are applicable. Although some genetic factors (Bonaı̈ti-Pellié, 1999; Olschwang, 1999) and the role of some nutritional factors (Franceschi, 1999; Giacosa et al., 1999) have already been identified, several uncertainties remain and there are numerous inconsistencies across studies on possible interactions between these factors (Little and Faivre, 1999). The objective of this paper is to review some available methods for evidencing genetic factors and assessing gene–environment interactions, to compare their respective advantages and limitations, and to consider the possible applications to the study of gene–nutrient interactions in colorectal cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200202000-00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200202000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

大多数疾病是遗传易感性和环境因素共同作用的结果。对于已经确定或强烈怀疑这两种因素的癌症来说尤其如此。然而,可能还有其他尚未查明的因素。分子遗传学的最新进展将使研究这些疾病的基因-环境相互作用变得更加容易。协同作用(即评估基因型对风险的影响是否因暴露水平而改变,或暴露对风险的影响是否因基因型而改变)具有重要的科学和公共卫生意义。事实上,它可以帮助阐明这些相互作用的机制,并评估个人的风险。相互作用的定义取决于模型和如何测量影响。当以疾病的相对风险来衡量这些影响时(通常是这种情况),相互作用意味着遗传和环境因素的共同影响不能简单地成倍增加。有几种可能的情况:(1)遗传因素和环境因素已经得到证实,目的是确定它们的共同作用;(2)一些遗传因素和环境因素在疾病的病因学中只被怀疑起作用,而某种相互作用被认为隐藏了主要影响,通过考虑这些因素可以克服这些影响;(3)忽略潜在的原因,对大量的因素进行搜索,希望幸运地找到一些东西。在基因-营养相互作用的情况下,所有这些情况都适用。虽然一些遗传因素(bonavia ti- pelli, 1999;Olschwang, 1999)和一些营养因素的作用(Franceschi, 1999;Giacosa et al., 1999)已经确定,仍然存在一些不确定性,并且在这些因素之间可能的相互作用的研究中存在许多不一致的地方(Little和Faivre, 1999)。本文的目的是综述一些现有的证据遗传因素和评估基因-环境相互作用的方法,比较它们各自的优点和局限性,并考虑可能的应用研究基因-营养相互作用在结直肠癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodological aspects of investigating gene-nutrient interactions.
Most diseases arise through the joint action of genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors. This is particularly true for cancers in which both types of factors have already been identified or strongly suspected. There may, however, be other as yet unidentified factors. Recent advances in molecular genetics will make it easier to study the gene– environment interactions in these diseases. Synergism (i.e. assessment of whether the effect of the genotype on risk is modified by the exposure level or whether the effect of exposure on risk is modified by the genotype) has important scientific and public health implications. Indeed, it could help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these interactions and to evaluate the risks for individuals. The definition of interaction is dependent on a model and on how the effects are measured. When the effects are measured in terms of relative risks of disease, which is usually the case, interaction means that the joint effects of genetic and environmental factors cannot simply be multiplied. There are a number of potential situations: (1) a genetic factor and an environmental factor have already been evidenced and the aim is to specify their joint effect; (2) some genetic and environmental factors are only suspected of playing a role in the aetiology of the disease and some kind of interaction is thought to be hiding the main effects, which could be overcome by taking it into account; and (3) oblivious to potential causes, a search is made for a large number of factors in the hope of being lucky enough to find something. In the case of gene–nutrient interactions, all these situations are applicable. Although some genetic factors (Bonaı̈ti-Pellié, 1999; Olschwang, 1999) and the role of some nutritional factors (Franceschi, 1999; Giacosa et al., 1999) have already been identified, several uncertainties remain and there are numerous inconsistencies across studies on possible interactions between these factors (Little and Faivre, 1999). The objective of this paper is to review some available methods for evidencing genetic factors and assessing gene–environment interactions, to compare their respective advantages and limitations, and to consider the possible applications to the study of gene–nutrient interactions in colorectal cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The PROPHET project paves the way for personalized prevention in the future healthcare. Prostate cancer burden in major BRICS countries, 1990-2019: findings from the 2019 global burden of disease study. Cancer mortality predictions for 2024 in selected Asian countries and Australia with focus on stomach cancer. Non-contrast MRI and post-mastectomy silicone breast implant rupture: preventing false positive diagnoses. Comment to: Inequalities in adherence to cervical cancer screening in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1