孟加拉国某三级医院常规临床标本中分离细菌的抗微生物药敏模式

Md. Anwar Hossain, M. M. Hossain, N. Begum
{"title":"孟加拉国某三级医院常规临床标本中分离细菌的抗微生物药敏模式","authors":"Md. Anwar Hossain, M. M. Hossain, N. Begum","doi":"10.55010/imcjms.16.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: To prevent the emergence and spreading of antimicrobial resistance, especially multidrug resistance in pathogenic bacteria, the selection of appropriate antibiotics is a prerequisite for the effective treatment of infection.This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital.\n\nMethods: This study was conducted at a teaching hospital of Dhaka city, Bangladesh from January 2020 to March 2021. The results of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples were collected and analysed. Identification of bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility test were performed according to the standard methods.\n\nResults: A total of 1277 bacterial isolates was analyzed. Of them, 1072 (83.95%) were Gram-negative, and 205 (16.05%) were Gram-positive bacteria. Among the isolates, Escherichia coli (n=576), Enterobacter spp. (n=150), Klebsiella spp. (n=140), and Staphylococcus aureus (n=117) were predominant.The Enterobacteriaceae showed higher resistance to cephradine (94.3%) and cefuroxime (76.7%), whereas least resistant to imipenem (10.1%) and meropenem (14.8%). Pseudomonas spp. was highly resistant to ceftriaxone (80.2%), and colistin (70.8%), whereas least resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam (15.1%). Colistin was the most effective agent (resistance 6.7%) against Acinetobacter spp. Linezolid (resistance 1%) and vancomycin (resistance 2%) were highly effective against Gram-positive bacteria. Among the Staphylococcus aureus, 95.7% were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). A total of 889 (69.6%) bacterial isolates were identified as multidrug resistant. Multidrug resistance was more prevalent in Gram-positive isolates (79.5%) than that of Gram-negative bacteria (67.7%). Furthermore, 7.5% of Gram-negative bacterial isolates were resistant to all seven classes of antibiotics tested.\n\nConclusions: This study revealed presence of high rate of resistance to several antimicrobial agents in bacteria isolated from various clinical samples.The findings would help healthcare professionals to select appropriate antibiotics for the effective treatment of infections and to develop antibiotic stewardship protocol.\n\nIMC J Med Sci 2022; 16(1): 005\n\n*Correspondence: M. Mahboob Hossain, Microbiology Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (MNS), BRAC University, 66 Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212. E-mail: mmhossain@bracu.ac.bd","PeriodicalId":55816,"journal":{"name":"IMC Journal of Medical Science","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from routine clinical specimens of a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Md. Anwar Hossain, M. M. Hossain, N. Begum\",\"doi\":\"10.55010/imcjms.16.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objectives: To prevent the emergence and spreading of antimicrobial resistance, especially multidrug resistance in pathogenic bacteria, the selection of appropriate antibiotics is a prerequisite for the effective treatment of infection.This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital.\\n\\nMethods: This study was conducted at a teaching hospital of Dhaka city, Bangladesh from January 2020 to March 2021. The results of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples were collected and analysed. Identification of bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility test were performed according to the standard methods.\\n\\nResults: A total of 1277 bacterial isolates was analyzed. Of them, 1072 (83.95%) were Gram-negative, and 205 (16.05%) were Gram-positive bacteria. Among the isolates, Escherichia coli (n=576), Enterobacter spp. (n=150), Klebsiella spp. (n=140), and Staphylococcus aureus (n=117) were predominant.The Enterobacteriaceae showed higher resistance to cephradine (94.3%) and cefuroxime (76.7%), whereas least resistant to imipenem (10.1%) and meropenem (14.8%). Pseudomonas spp. was highly resistant to ceftriaxone (80.2%), and colistin (70.8%), whereas least resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam (15.1%). Colistin was the most effective agent (resistance 6.7%) against Acinetobacter spp. Linezolid (resistance 1%) and vancomycin (resistance 2%) were highly effective against Gram-positive bacteria. Among the Staphylococcus aureus, 95.7% were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). A total of 889 (69.6%) bacterial isolates were identified as multidrug resistant. Multidrug resistance was more prevalent in Gram-positive isolates (79.5%) than that of Gram-negative bacteria (67.7%). Furthermore, 7.5% of Gram-negative bacterial isolates were resistant to all seven classes of antibiotics tested.\\n\\nConclusions: This study revealed presence of high rate of resistance to several antimicrobial agents in bacteria isolated from various clinical samples.The findings would help healthcare professionals to select appropriate antibiotics for the effective treatment of infections and to develop antibiotic stewardship protocol.\\n\\nIMC J Med Sci 2022; 16(1): 005\\n\\n*Correspondence: M. Mahboob Hossain, Microbiology Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (MNS), BRAC University, 66 Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212. E-mail: mmhossain@bracu.ac.bd\",\"PeriodicalId\":55816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IMC Journal of Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IMC Journal of Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.16.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMC Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.16.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:为防止病原菌耐药特别是多药耐药的出现和传播,选择合适的抗生素是有效治疗感染的前提。本研究旨在分析某三级医院不同临床样本中分离的细菌的流行情况和耐药模式。方法:本研究于2020年1月至2021年3月在孟加拉国达卡市的一家教学医院进行。收集临床各样本分离细菌培养结果及药敏试验结果进行分析。按标准方法进行细菌鉴定和药敏试验。结果:共分离出1277株细菌。其中革兰氏阴性1072例(83.95%),革兰氏阳性205例(16.05%)。其中以大肠埃希菌(576株)、肠杆菌(150株)、克雷伯氏菌(140株)和金黄色葡萄球菌(117株)为主。肠杆菌科对头孢拉定(94.3%)和头孢呋辛(76.7%)的耐药率较高,对亚胺培南(10.1%)和美罗培南(14.8%)的耐药率最低。假单胞菌对头孢曲松(80.2%)和粘菌素(70.8%)的耐药程度最高,对哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的耐药程度最低(15.1%)。粘菌素对不动杆菌最有效(耐药6.7%),利奈唑胺(耐药1%)和万古霉素(耐药2%)对革兰阳性菌最有效。金黄色葡萄球菌中耐甲氧西林(MRSA)占95.7%。共有889株(69.6%)分离出多重耐药菌株。革兰氏阳性菌(79.5%)耐多药率高于革兰氏阴性菌(67.7%)。此外,7.5%的革兰氏阴性细菌分离株对所有7类抗生素都具有耐药性。结论:本研究揭示了从各种临床样本中分离的细菌对几种抗菌药物的高耐药率。研究结果将有助于卫生保健专业人员选择合适的抗生素以有效治疗感染,并制定抗生素管理方案。中华医学会医学杂志2022;16(1): 005*通讯:M. Mahboob Hossain,微生物项目,数学与自然科学系(MNS),达卡,1212。电子邮件:mmhossain@bracu.ac.bd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from routine clinical specimens of a tertiary hospital in Bangladesh
Background and objectives: To prevent the emergence and spreading of antimicrobial resistance, especially multidrug resistance in pathogenic bacteria, the selection of appropriate antibiotics is a prerequisite for the effective treatment of infection.This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This study was conducted at a teaching hospital of Dhaka city, Bangladesh from January 2020 to March 2021. The results of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from various clinical samples were collected and analysed. Identification of bacteria and antimicrobial susceptibility test were performed according to the standard methods. Results: A total of 1277 bacterial isolates was analyzed. Of them, 1072 (83.95%) were Gram-negative, and 205 (16.05%) were Gram-positive bacteria. Among the isolates, Escherichia coli (n=576), Enterobacter spp. (n=150), Klebsiella spp. (n=140), and Staphylococcus aureus (n=117) were predominant.The Enterobacteriaceae showed higher resistance to cephradine (94.3%) and cefuroxime (76.7%), whereas least resistant to imipenem (10.1%) and meropenem (14.8%). Pseudomonas spp. was highly resistant to ceftriaxone (80.2%), and colistin (70.8%), whereas least resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam (15.1%). Colistin was the most effective agent (resistance 6.7%) against Acinetobacter spp. Linezolid (resistance 1%) and vancomycin (resistance 2%) were highly effective against Gram-positive bacteria. Among the Staphylococcus aureus, 95.7% were methicillin-resistant (MRSA). A total of 889 (69.6%) bacterial isolates were identified as multidrug resistant. Multidrug resistance was more prevalent in Gram-positive isolates (79.5%) than that of Gram-negative bacteria (67.7%). Furthermore, 7.5% of Gram-negative bacterial isolates were resistant to all seven classes of antibiotics tested. Conclusions: This study revealed presence of high rate of resistance to several antimicrobial agents in bacteria isolated from various clinical samples.The findings would help healthcare professionals to select appropriate antibiotics for the effective treatment of infections and to develop antibiotic stewardship protocol. IMC J Med Sci 2022; 16(1): 005 *Correspondence: M. Mahboob Hossain, Microbiology Program, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (MNS), BRAC University, 66 Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212. E-mail: mmhossain@bracu.ac.bd
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies among rural children aged 6-14 years in a selected block of West Bengal, India Mustard oil consumption and Harris platelet syndrome: unveiling a dietary link to thrombocytopenia in the Indian subcontinent Anxiety levels and influencing factors among the relatives of patients presenting to the emergency department Association between mustard oil consumption and thrombocytopenia: a case-control study in Bangladesh Pleomorphic adenoma of the submandibular gland: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1