循序渐进还是两极分化?2011- 2012年波兰和法国大选期间的网络受众和网络

Karolina Koc-Michalska, D. Lilleker
{"title":"循序渐进还是两极分化?2011- 2012年波兰和法国大选期间的网络受众和网络","authors":"Karolina Koc-Michalska, D. Lilleker","doi":"10.4018/ijep.2014010103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative studies are rare in the study of online communication campaigning. The authors chose two cases, Poland and France, to describe the two campaigns for the Parliamentary elections. Content analysis allowed the authors to detect online communication strategies and parties' attempt to reach different audiences. Web-cartography illustrates the parties' network connections. The authors find strong cross-country and resource-based differences for the more interactive and engaging features (Web 2.0), which are not that powerful for explaining audience-targeting strategies. Overall a sales strategy and a focus on marketing dominated over e-representation (exhibiting the parties' political record). In both countries social media platforms are well incorporated into online strategies. Facebook dominates in Poland, Twitter in France. Web cartography gives a counterintuitive picture of the Polish parties' network being much more personalized but also of more ghettoing within the supporting environment.","PeriodicalId":13695,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. E Politics","volume":"10 1","pages":"41-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving In Step or Poles Apart?: Online Audiences and Networking During Poland and France 2011-12 Election Campaign\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Koc-Michalska, D. Lilleker\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijep.2014010103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparative studies are rare in the study of online communication campaigning. The authors chose two cases, Poland and France, to describe the two campaigns for the Parliamentary elections. Content analysis allowed the authors to detect online communication strategies and parties' attempt to reach different audiences. Web-cartography illustrates the parties' network connections. The authors find strong cross-country and resource-based differences for the more interactive and engaging features (Web 2.0), which are not that powerful for explaining audience-targeting strategies. Overall a sales strategy and a focus on marketing dominated over e-representation (exhibiting the parties' political record). In both countries social media platforms are well incorporated into online strategies. Facebook dominates in Poland, Twitter in France. Web cartography gives a counterintuitive picture of the Polish parties' network being much more personalized but also of more ghettoing within the supporting environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. E Politics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"41-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. E Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014010103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. E Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014010103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

比较研究在网络传播竞选研究中是罕见的。作者选择了波兰和法国两个案例来描述议会选举的两场运动。内容分析使作者能够发现在线传播策略和各方试图接触不同受众的尝试。网络制图说明了各方的网络联系。作者发现,在交互性更强、更吸引人的特性(Web 2.0)上,存在着强烈的跨国家和基于资源的差异,这在解释受众定位策略时并不那么有力。总的来说,销售策略和对市场营销的关注主导了电子代表(展示政党的政治记录)。在这两个国家,社交媒体平台都很好地融入了在线战略。Facebook在波兰占主导地位,Twitter在法国。网络地图给出了一幅反直觉的画面,波兰政党的网络更加个性化,但在支持环境中也更加排外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evolving In Step or Poles Apart?: Online Audiences and Networking During Poland and France 2011-12 Election Campaign
Comparative studies are rare in the study of online communication campaigning. The authors chose two cases, Poland and France, to describe the two campaigns for the Parliamentary elections. Content analysis allowed the authors to detect online communication strategies and parties' attempt to reach different audiences. Web-cartography illustrates the parties' network connections. The authors find strong cross-country and resource-based differences for the more interactive and engaging features (Web 2.0), which are not that powerful for explaining audience-targeting strategies. Overall a sales strategy and a focus on marketing dominated over e-representation (exhibiting the parties' political record). In both countries social media platforms are well incorporated into online strategies. Facebook dominates in Poland, Twitter in France. Web cartography gives a counterintuitive picture of the Polish parties' network being much more personalized but also of more ghettoing within the supporting environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theorizing the Journalism Model of Disinformation and Hate Speech Propagation in a Nigerian Democratic Context Farming on Facebook, Camera-less Food Photography and a New Indian Pastoral A Possible Framework for Attention-Based Politics: A Field for Research The Potential of Interactive Negotiated Narratives in Rebuilding and Reimagining Northern Irish Society Citizen Engagement and Social Media: The Case of Mexican Presidential Candidacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1