2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较苏门答腊大学牙科学院口腔颌面外科

Ahyar Riza, I. B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie
{"title":"2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较苏门答腊大学牙科学院口腔颌面外科","authors":"Ahyar Riza, I. B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie","doi":"10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18instruments soaked in Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%. Each instrumentwere pre-cleaned using brush, water and soap for both group before going through disinfection process. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. The comparison between Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%showedno significant difference to the total bacteria count on instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 <0.05). Conclusion: Glutaraldehyde 2% showed more effective than Hydrogen Peroxide 3% in disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps. Keyword: Disinfection, Forceps, Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen peroxide Cite this Article: Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT. 2020. Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 5(3): 150-153. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v5i3.829 Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara Ahyar Riza,* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie","PeriodicalId":31119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","volume":"108 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara\",\"authors\":\"Ahyar Riza, I. B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie\",\"doi\":\"10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18instruments soaked in Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%. Each instrumentwere pre-cleaned using brush, water and soap for both group before going through disinfection process. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. The comparison between Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%showedno significant difference to the total bacteria count on instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 <0.05). Conclusion: Glutaraldehyde 2% showed more effective than Hydrogen Peroxide 3% in disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps. Keyword: Disinfection, Forceps, Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen peroxide Cite this Article: Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT. 2020. Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 5(3): 150-153. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v5i3.829 Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara Ahyar Riza,* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie\",\"PeriodicalId\":31119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/JDMFS.V0I0.829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较2%戊二醛和3%过氧化氢对北苏门答腊大学口腔外科口腔外科拔牙器械的消毒效果。材料与方法:本研究为实验研究,采用后验对照组设计方法。采用目的技术,采用下磨牙拔牙钳采集标本。本研究将样品分为2组,每组18台仪器分别浸泡在2%戊二醛和3%过氧化氢溶液中。两组仪器均使用毛刷、水和肥皂进行预清洁,然后进行消毒。结果:采用Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析。2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢消毒后仪器细菌总数比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.014 <0.05)。结论:2%戊二醛对下磨牙拔牙钳的消毒效果优于3%过氧化氢。关键词:消毒,镊子,戊二醛,过氧化氢本文引用:Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT。2020. 2%戊二醛与3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较苏门答腊大学牙科学院口腔颌面外科牙颌面科学杂志5(3):150-153。DOI: 10.15562/jdmf .v5i3.829 2%和3%过氧化氢对拔牙器械消毒效果的比较,sumatra Utara大学牙科学院口腔外科颌面科,Ahyar Riza,* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara
Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18instruments soaked in Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%. Each instrumentwere pre-cleaned using brush, water and soap for both group before going through disinfection process. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. The comparison between Glutaraldehyde 2% and Hydrogen Peroxide 3%showedno significant difference to the total bacteria count on instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 <0.05). Conclusion: Glutaraldehyde 2% showed more effective than Hydrogen Peroxide 3% in disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps. Keyword: Disinfection, Forceps, Glutaraldehyde, Hydrogen peroxide Cite this Article: Riza A, Siregar IB, Syaflida R, Tanslie JT. 2020. Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 5(3): 150-153. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v5i3.829 Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of glutaraldehyde 2% and hydrogen peroxide 3% on tooth extraction instruments in Department of Oral Surgery and Maxillofacial, Faculty of Dentistry, University Sumatera Utara Ahyar Riza,* Indra B. Siregar, Rahmi Syaflida, Jeanie T. Tanslie
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between eating pattern and food neophobia in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Parents' perceptions Combination of surgical exposure and fixed orthodontic appliance in bilateral impacted canine Oral potentially malignant disorder awareness level among elder community in the Belawa Distric, Wajo, South Sulawesi, Indonesia Management of central diastema with high-frenulum labialis Immunohistochemistry assay of osteocalcin on bone healing with CHA-10% propolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1